Member Info for JohnnySmiths

Partner coming shortly. Another fake news by the rampers, trying to claw back their losses. We will be months and months before anything decisive closes if it happens. You can keep spreading your misinformation, it will not change anything. I am also long, 16p is resistence based on technicals. Doesn't matter what happens with the chart at this point, once we get a few months out and we are waiting around doing nothing you will finally understand. CEV took 7-8 months to close their deal, we have barely been in it for not even 1 month now. You guys are shameless with your lies.

Like how many fking times will you say the same fking thing over and over and over and over again? When they don't get a partner in because no one wants to touch this, you will all be crying. When they drill in 2026 (not 2025), again, FALSE INFORMATION, then you will all be looking for wellfare assistance. Go bake a cake or some sht!

I would find that amusing if I was married, are you sure you're not sleeping in the dog house and delirious again? :)

When they drill, and miss. And you are sitting here holding empty bags, you will understand. The risk here is off the charts, a good pay off if it works, but with those odds you'll have to excuse me for wanting to walk tentatively.

Yes, because no CEO in the history of AIM has ever fudged the truth even in the slightest. If you're that gullible, I have an oil well in Nigeria, my friend who is a prince, is looking for investors. You would be perfect!

They drilled 11 holes, and none of these produced oil. Can you tell me what percent that is? 0%. I was at least generous in saying 10-15%.

CEV's Perspective block just north (the closest block drilled for oil) showed nothing as well.

If majors were ready to sign, why haven't they yet? They've had multiple chances to. And that is why I am curious about the data United are showing them. They haven't signed "because their corporate strategy changed", this just made me laugh. Myfirstmillion, let me explain something to you. Do you know when you want sex, and your wife tells you "she has a headache" or stomachache or whatever.......well, she's probably lying and wielding it as an excuse to get away from you :).

I'm not trying to get people not to buy. Buy all you want. What I have an issue with is the misleading statements made by people on here, who are clearly trying to pump the stock because they have lost a lot of money. Like the person who was saying they would have a partner "next week". We are not in week 3 after this, what happens if they don't find a partner on terms that are conducive to shareholders and the company?

You say I am trying too hard, do you realise i make only a few posts every week, there are people here making 20-30 posts a day covering entire pages. Please tell me who is trying too hard?

Do you also realise that any partner will only stump for Colibri drilling, and nothing besides this? What are the chances of Colibri showing oil? Most drills only hit 20-25% of the time, given Colibri and all the misses Jamaica has had, I would put this percentage much much lower, 10-15%. You need to take these into consideration, I bet there are people here with their entire life savings invested in the company because they are not circumspect enough to realise this. You are better off playing roullette with those odds. All I'm asking is you guys stop posting false information, there are real risks here. I am also long, but I'm not naive enough to believe half the nonsense that is posted here.

Well, think about it Jono, United have had the Walton Morant since 2017, and till now, 9 years later, have had trouble finding a partner? Something just doesn't add up. I would love to see the data they are peddling, my guess, is it's not quite as appealing as the CEO interviews seem to suggest.

As for Panman. i'll reiterate. The carry costs on Walton Morant are 5 figures. Put that into perspective. If you are sitting on a multi billion barrel prospective, are you really not going to pursue it because the carry costs are 70 or 80 thousand dollars per annum, when you are doing 1.7 billion in revenues?

Let's not forget, oil had gone negative. Never in the history of time, has oil had a negative price on it, and this was because storage costs essentially ran forward contracts into inversion. What Tullow did, was cut all the projects that were marginal, or uneconomical standard deviation wise. And so a project with the prospects that are being billed by the CEO here, assuming they stood to be truly realised, it makes no sense for Tullow to have cut.

A well will be drilled (hopefully), but I'm not so sure we are going to like what we find to be honest. If it's another Pedro Banks hype story, or any of the other 12 stories we've been told bout oil, that went nowhere, well, then you guys shamelessly ramping will realise that you should have been a little more circumspect, and stop acting like giddy children! Lay off the coca cola guys, they put cocaine in that sh*t!

Are you aware Tullow cleared well over 500 mil $ in EBIT during the same year that they walked from the Jamaican assets? To service their debt, would have been a fraction of those inflows. Not only that, but Tullow have been cash generative to the tune of 100's of millions per year, and in some instances have even cleared billions in a single year in net income. Debt, is a viable way to grow a business, and when you have 0% interest rates, the way things were during covid, is in fact a way to generate growth with capital that doesn't really hold any attachment that would curb operations, certainly not operations as holding Walton Morant. Can you tell me what the carrying costs on Walton are on an annual basis? It's probably in the 5 digits just for holding those exploration licenses. So think of it this way, if Tullow saw the same potential in these properties, holding and pursuing them would have been a drop in the bucket for a company like this.

You are flawed in your thinking, because you are not really thinking this through properly. Once we see the actual failures start to roll in in respects to these oil well drills, you will finally understand. Why have United not attracted a partner as yet, it's been years they have been in talks. Oil was above 80$ per barrel. What does that tell you. If some of the major sophisticated players in the sector are hesitant to partner? Think things through, you will get there.

Tullow likely let this go because the prospects are very low in respects to finding oil. I'm sure covid had a part in it, but they could have sat on the asset, as the carrying costs were minimal if non existent at best. So, my guess is they made a calculated exit, and Tullow's drill success rates are some of the highest in the industry, they are almost double the average O&G rate. So if Tullow walked, you know they walked because they didn't think much of the prospects here, does not mean they are always right, but definitely something to sit up and take notice off.

The ramping here is just insane. Where is the guy that was saying they will have a partner "next week"? Well, it is 3 weeks now, maybe he meant next week 2026? I will give him the benefit of the doubt 🤦‍♂️

The company posted below, CEV, they took 7-8 months to close out their partner deal, let that sink in. My timeline is towards the end of the year. Realism is not a strong suite on these boards sadly.

If Pedro Bank was not done right, why didn't they return to "do it right". How many failures has Jamaica had, 10? 12? At what point do you learn to realise that prospects are not appealing in respects to the odds of oil given geochems? Tullow didn't see any need to maintain these, odds are low. I have taken a very small position, I will not delude myself with this nonsense ramping chatter

Stop copying my username.

Like how many nonsense fking posts are you idiots going to make? Just shameless ramping. It will be months to get a partner, notice the CEO says we should be at the edge of our seats........assuming we can get a partner. Meaning there's a very real posibility no one even bites. Jamaican prospects have been terrible for a reason. Pedro Bank, research it, and when you blow your cash chasing something that turns out to not have economic viability, you will understand. Be normal, it's not asking much.

Karlvonwise, I know that Tullow were going through some structural changes, but they must have thought there was a very high likelyihood that these properties didn't amount to much, in order to walk away the way they did. Not to say that is 100% a certainty.

I've been asking my contacts and anyone that knows much about the oil and gas industry, to look into this. And the geotech I have showed the Gaffney paper to, mentioned that probabilities were likely very low based on the geo chems and area they were showing in the Gaffney paper. Not impossible, but a long shot. Granted, that is clearly not all the data, so I'm not making assertions by any stretch.

If you look a little north of Walton, the Bahamas Perserverance-1 block turned up dry, and they drilled that fairly deep as well, and it is the closest geological body to the Walton prospects. And so that also makes me a little skeptical. Of course, that is not conclussive either, and there could very well be oil in Walton.

But, it just makes me so mad to listen to the rampers here. They post such nonsense it's ridiculous! The prospects of drilling finding oil are always relatively low, and I think for Walton it will be even lower than average drills. Just be a little circumspect is all!

Troll Man and Small P*nis, with the shameless ramping as usual. You know you are compensating for something if you feel the need to post as a username suggesting something. Just saying 🙄😂

What is hotting up, can you tell us? Another Pedro Banks scam 3 billion barrels that fetched nothing? EVERY single oil drill Jamaica has had has produced nothing. Zip. Nada.

There's a reason Tullow walked away from these leases and didn't look back. Hmmm, I wonder what that could be? It's not like they didn't have the 3D Seismic data United ran for them. And they still walked, as did Texas Oil, as did the 2 canadian companies prior Hatfield Harfield, whatever their name was, and as did the 4 companies before that, and the 2 companies before that. Almost 10 companies if not more, have walked away from Jamaica.

Any sane person understands this, if you are stupid enough to fall for the hype that Troll Man and his little friend, are pushing, well you deserve to lose your money. I am waiting to see them actually prove something, hint hint, sh*t ain't "next week" numbskulls!

Pedro Banks was all the hype back in the day, they said it hosted 3 bil barrels. Well, if you followed that story, you know how it ended. Walton Morrant have no oil, until it is confirmed, and judging by the prior failures, i would suggest caution is all.

I'm going to stop arguing with you because you are a waste of my time.

i've showed you 3 places now where they say that they expect a partner by "end of year", one of which is the CEO interview himself at minute 21 that confirms this.

First you said I made the video, I do not know if it is AI, but everything stated in that video is accurate. The you said I was working for Tullow, which is again woefully wrong, as I have never had anything to do with the company and live on a different continent to any operations they have. if there anything else you would like to accuse me of, please do so now, because I am just done wasting my time with you.

"The only thing I am focusing on now, until the end of the year, is a partner"

Minute 21:00 of the full interview by the CEO.

Hmmm, I must have AI that one too 😂😂😂

Seems like the one getting desperate, are the shareholders who have been holding this into .1 p. I hope for all your sakes you make your money back, but let's not pretend like this is a sure thing. Based on the prior evidence, of abandoned projects turning up uneconomical, it is very much a gamble, and you would only be fooling yourselves to think otherwise. But then again, judging by the intelligence quotient on these forums, well :)

really? i ai generated that content? man, i seen stupid before, but you just took the cake with that comment.

if you watch the entire interview from the very clip that trollman posted, https://x.com/wrightmanaim/status/1909561413820969395?s=46&t=4s-aqzzhmmewz3ire1aesa, in this very interview, the ceo himself says that they are expecting a partner at the "end of the year". did i ai that as well?

jamaica have no oil. they've drilled 10 oil wells, and only seen sud carbons. the 2 oil wells drilled in negril, westmoreland are now abandoned. the wells drilled in st ann, at ****pit country, content, santa cruz, clarendon, and the pedro banks (saw 2 oil well drills), and each and every one of these have been uneconomical and consequently abandoned. there's a reason why united have not attracted a partner yet, and it's because the chances of finding oil here are very slim.

if they find it, it will be great, but let's not act like it's a sure thing. this is a gamble.

i ai made up the interview, i also ai made up the interview with the ceo directly saying straight from the horse mouth that they expect a partner towards the end of the year, i also am a tullow agent who is secretly working undercover to undermine united, in spite of the fact that tullow have shared interests with the company.

oh yeah, you make a lot of sense bro. another brain dead island smoker. talk facts

It's one thing to hold an opinion, quite another to still maintain it after being told unequivocally that representatives soliticing have stated their timelines "end of year". If you want clueless, I would suggest a look in the mirror, it's obvious not many on here understand the base principles of business.

Let this end the debate. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=bqKS1tlZnCM, the company are delaying partner search, that's a second source confirming what I've been saying.

Does it ever occur to you that the LSE might not be the staple exchange I am trading on? The level of stupidity on offer here, is glaring. Riding the waves to .1 p??? Well, you sure rode that wave : ) You're getting invidious because someone is giving you information that is FACTUAL, unlike the bull sit timelines of "next week" which were posted by various ill informed individuals here. Think about that for a second.

The representatives that have been pushing that deal, have themselves suggested at timelines towards the end of the year. There are numerous new parties that are being sounded, meaning they are going to give these new parties an opportunity to comb through the data.

Taking the first offer (assuming one does even show up on their doorstep), that comes their way, without ensuring full due process for new and potential partners is skirting the companies fiduciary duties. And hence why they themselves are expecting a deal to occur more so towards the end of the year themselves.

Next week will come and pass, and I can gaurantee you, that no partner will be signed. The next few weeks will come and go, and I can gaurantee you, that no partner will be signed. This is the due diligence process. You clearly do not seem to understand this, and that's why you keep misrepresenting facts, and projecting your own "drivel" and "gossip" on to a poster that's trying to correct the timelines for expectation here. If you had any common sense whatsoever, you would realise the truth in what i am saying, but apparently that seems a little beyond you. What shareholders should be looking out for, are those permits, and even that seems then contingent on bringing in a partner to do the work. Revise your timelines, it's really that simple. Not complicated.

You should change your user name to Trollman!

i love it how someone comes on here and factually corrects the dates of misleading statements, and has a slew of ******s make irrelevant posts about "foundations".

you're a little slow, i'll give you a pass.