Member Info for johnjunior

What do the 24 million of performance fees relate to? Anyone? Relieved that dividend is held at 7.9.

ok maybe with buy backs a good recovery of the share price instead

i topped up yesterday so now have over 18000 shares in this so im concerned about the dividend announcement on Friday .At the very least im expecting them to maintain the dividend ., and im hoping they increase the special from 3 p .The interim figure for underlying earnings was 78 m and there is no reason to believe that the second half wont match that so at that is at least 150 million full year less tax about 120 million better than last year when it was only 105 and we had 12.2 p last May and 7.9 in Sept. With this prospect in mind the price does not justify the performance and the increasing AUM .One suggestion by analysts is there is the future prospect of more regulation in this industry and more competiton but it does not seem to affect MNG the same way and they pay 8.5% approx (which i have ) but without the loss of capital. Cannot see that when the global economy is firing on all cylinders this will not reach a more acceptable valuation .

www.thetimes.co.uk/article/jupiter-fund-managers-make-60m-from-chrysalis-m6bw5txz2

Further research has made me realise that this company is not an investment trust but a financial services company. Little did i know !!!

Maybe someone in the know can i explain why the JUP share price is 267 but its net asset value is currently (according to LSE) 44p. All the other investment trusts I have HHi,TMPL,HFEL,and MRCH have only a slight premium to the share price ...Discuss.

Im wrong ...thought u meant average purchase price....

So after you were reminded that the lowest price for TCAP was 1.85 you are still sticking to your claim you have an average of about 1.62 and it was `nt a typo. ??

He thought covid would be over by Easter and swallowing disenfectant could get rid of it didn`t he ?

https://youtu.be/QwjiIIht0bw
Video posted before the pandemic crash (Feb 19th) and before China ripped up the one country two systems treaty and before the latest scandal. HK property was overvalued then and is now even more vulnerable since the Chinese now see HSBC as a threat to national security since money laundering scandal and more residents wish to leave HK.Quite a technical video ....needs to be seen a few times to take in the details.

Didnt know they could that after the share went ex dividend at 4 30 last afternoon ??

Why not announce it yesterday before people like me topped up to
get the dividend

Is there life in this corpse ? 23 trades today and all of them appear to be purchases .Is the market reacting to prospects of an improving pound or greater footfall in the shops recently (noticed a few more customers at my local store in Swansea ) and some were actually paying for things instead of window shopping. Still not tempted to top up ....

the takeover offer for GNK perhaps?

glad i didnt get sucked in this time .by adding .until we saw the figures.......learnt from past experience...

3.3 to sell with first direct......says it all

Why was the share price at 5p when we were producing 650 and now we produce around 1000.was it at 2 or 3??? ..
At the last official count we were producing 673 bopd on average and that is only because we included the production of another company after the placement. which increased the number of shares.in circulation Because we produced a 1000 barrels on one day to satisfy Leo`s prediction does not mean much.
.MMs just like most of the investing fraternity trade on future expectations particularly if a CEO has hyped up those expectations .When Leo hyped this up in September 2017 the market got ahead itself and quickly raced towards nearly 8p without a proportional increase in production to justify it. When the the numbers didnt match the expectations it inevitably retraced itself .during the last year. Leo talked of a high case scenario of 1600 for Goudron alone ( not including any new fields ) and because they only reached a daily average 673 (including the production from Steeldum) this fell well short of those expectations and the price was justifiably lowered by the market.
.In absolute terms the company has undoubtedly improved its prospects and revenue and is making progress but in relative terms it has fallen short of what was expected .After the recent tweet by the CFO this has raised expectations again (and the share price) and I hope this time there is something of substance to justify it..
I am totally objective towards the future of this company and react to the facts and figures as contained in any RNS but not the hype .I await the update with an open mind and will act accordingly. I hope just as we all do that SWP is a huge success but accept that it may fall short. This share is a high risk investment.

not trying to persuade anyone of another poster s view .Just pointing out the disappointing performance so far ( thats an undeniable fact as borne out by the decline from 7 p to nearly 2p)...Ive got a completely open mind about coming events...It may great news next week and i will act accordingly(increase) or it may be below expectations( decrease)...i dont really care what rossannan does or says although if a lot of people had dumped at a price he claims to have sold at( 6.6) they would be in a better position to top up next week with the proceeds of such a sale (if the update warrants it of course.)

reduced to 200,000 from 328000 sometime ago ( no reason to regret it )...awaiting positive update next week..before adding again (maybe)...updates from the past have everytime fallen short of the expectations of the superampers and dreamers( hence the relentless downtrend)..Maybe this time it will be different (?). Not interested in the bopd so much this time ...more interested in quarterly revenue and available cash ....so hoping for a quarterly figure of above $4 million plus in revenue( at least) and no decrease on the last cash figure of $2.6 million .Last .but not least a definite commitment to commencement of drilling on the SWP by identifying a possible location and possible start date .Fingers crossed for next week Good luck to all LTHs .

The offer of 2.74p is derisory in the extreme. A company with no debt,. an internationally recognised brand and a turnover of well over 10 times its market value is worth much more .Its true that the turnover has not delivered a profit margin recently because of the low value of the pound and retailers have suffered everywhere but a stronger pound above 1.50/1.60 will change that and a movement into hospitality can diversify the business , I hope the CEO tells Mr Flack what he can do with his money and allows the current shareholders a fighting chance of recovering past losses by maintaining control >An acceptance of this ridiculous offer is of no benefit to anyone other than Mr Flack ..Do we get a vote on the offer ?