Member Info for john389

It’s you that are repeating ‘news baked in’ to gain an entry!

I already know they have control.What I am getting at is do they have the resources to help ETQ financially

Hasnt Ebioss got a smaller market cap then ETQ? How can Ebioss take control?

instead of GKP thanks as would not touch gkp with a barge pole.Way too risky in that region in my opinion!

on ADVFN Interestingly it seems the PH manifesto is a little clearer on the return of rights issue It is telling that the only mention of our rights in the national BN manifesto is a one liner: The rights of Sabah and Sarawak under the Malaysia Agreement 1963 will be realised by consensus. ‘By consensus’ implies discussion and negotiation. In contrast, the national PH manifesto dedicates nine wide-ranging promises to the people of Sabah and Sarawak under one of its 5 pillars with the heading ‘Return Sabah and Sarawak to the status accorded in the Malaysia Agreement 1963’. No negotiation and consensus needed � the national PH leaders have acknowledged and agreed to respect our rights, and have made promises to uplift the lives of our people

Reading Druid�s posts on ADVFN the new guy in power seems to look on Sarawaks rights favoursbly!

Sort for the typos typing on this iPhone keyboard!

I totally agree balance is important but it�s the passion in my opinion with which he counters Aberdeenman that suggests to me there is another motive here . besides which with he have heard his �balanced� posts repeatedly in my opinion. If he really does hold still then of course I apologise for saying I think he has sold out

Your post has all the hallmarks of a bitter person who has sold too soon and trying to get back in again.Aberdeenman man has wrote a piece that may have exuberant target prices but at least his commendable research (in my opinion) could prove helpful to potential investors.Aside from your bashing , where is your attempt at research? He has also been critical of the company in part as well in all fairness to him.I believe in outlining risks as well if any investment but from your recent posts I detect a sense of frustration at the share price!

I agree discussion of possible downside is rational but not if it�s overemphasised and becomes repetitive which I am not saying is necessarily the case here.Also if there is a sudden change of behaviour of a poster one can then sense motive!

I am talking about posters in general trashing a stock .I am not making this personal!

In my opinion you welcome contrarian views because you are looking to build up a position.No person in his right mind spends time on a board trashing a stock unless he or she has a motive.Eg trying to buy in lower

Well done for taking profit but in my opinion the tiny valuation is a joke compared to excellent results and fully funded to boot!

Elartu and Bob for such informative excellent posts!

bigger then the recent global deal signed? What share price is realistic on signing?

Thank you for your reply and for the informative posts and of course the others too

How do you know there is a presentation in a few weeks to analysts etc?

Thanks for your reply.Any guess what the share could be on the Hunter order?

Thanks for that post.When is all that news you mention due roughly?

Why is the blend test news very significant?