Member Info for JMole

LOL Sam doesn’t know what he’s doing, his previous experience in SNT is buying high and selling low, now he’s determined to trade it aggressively as possible to make a few percent here and there, I suspect he’ll miss out on another big rise and then become even more bitter and we’ll be plagued with him forever more.

Why not try a different method Sam, collect it while it’s low (like people are doing here) have some faith in it and wait for good news. Then if you want to sell it go ahead and get out with a healthy profit.

Then leave the rest of us who see the long term potential in it in peace, or hell, even come along for the ride, but Jesus stop being such a miserable bastard - you’re such a drag.

About 8.3 Million at 30p. Think that was the first of them exercised? Someone was a bit trigger happy!

RP has some exercisable at 15p but only if the share price stays above 60p for 5days.

https://twitter.com/raparris/status/1458520887901163524?s=21

The main man himself with a Twitter tease

I do hope Sam has submitted his questions!

…bit of buying into close, someone fancies the chances of another announcement before the virtual event.

Question…

Why on earth would you buy back in if you have no faith in the company to deliver value to their shareholders???

I’m all seriousness Sam your investment strategy sounds like it needs a bit of work, I’ve never come across anything like it. You spend months holding to sell for a small loss, then you buy back into the company you clearly have total disdain for, only to then post how crap it is on a board full of fellow shareholders.

It’s like the trading equivalent of self-flagellation. Absolutely bizarre.

According to your posting history Sam…

You bought at about 36p pre consolidation …and managed to sell months later for a loss at 34p? …and you’re now your looking to buy back in?

Why the hell would you want to do that if you actually believe the bull that you post?

You do realise that if you would have actually kept faith in the company from the off, and averaged down to the low 20s when we were in the doldrums, you could be completely de-risked by now, and sitting on a free ride.

I think that explains the bitterness, and negativity.

Spot on! No one would have a problem with you if your posts were balanced Sam.

Every sensible investor here should want an objective view, but your posts are just pure negativity and spite.

Asking questions is great, but you simply spout your horribly biased opinions and respond to anyone who replies to your ‘concerns’ in such an obnoxious manner that it is clear you have no interest in seeing the company succeed in the slightest.

Sam, I don’t think you’re holding. Why would slate something you hold, absolute nonsense.

You’ve discredited yourself. …again.

..as I thought Sam, you have no response.

Grow up mate.

Sam, if you want to be taken seriously how about you try not being rude and belligerent.

Try imagining your talking to someone face to face rather than as an anonymous troll on the internet.

Which part of my post do you think is fantasy?

That you brought up the subject of Blockchain? - check the post history.

..Because it can’t be the fact that they are looking into the possibilities of carbon trading via blockchain tech, as it is written in black and white?

Sam, that message was in response to you, who brought up the subject of the possible move into blockchain. I was agreeing with you in the sense that I was surprised not to see it picked up on more by the usual suspects.

Personally though I think that is a very exciting move, do you not? At least I think we can both agree that the expectation that they will move into this sector is based on fact, seeing as they put together the report and released it for public consumption via RNS.

Sambar,

balanced discussions are great, but the points you raised have been addressed.

The Warrants situation is clearly a positive. There’s no other way of looking at that, more money and a higher SP. ..and if your worried that people would exercise them for a measly couple of pennies profit, do you not think they would have done so on the last spike?

Your point about time commitments of the board is purely speculation, and I don’t think anyone who actually holds SNT is worried about the commitment of RP. The news flow has been excellent recently.

If it was a lifestyle company, like so many others on AIM, they would not be making new appointments, setting up a subsidiary in the US, striking deals, and commissioning reports into new areas of growth.

Your point about revenue is a good one, we need more money - the company is in a transitional phase and we will have to see where this comes from next. As you’ve already brought up, this could be by the exercise of warrants, it could be from further orders of the existing and improved boiler tech, it could be from the new licensing deals, and I’d definitely put my bet on Athan Fox securing some public or private funds for our projects. If you’ve looked at his work through his battery recycling companies you’ll be well aware of his capabilities on that front!

You come across very bitter Sam, I don’t think any reader of your posts is learning anything apart from that for reasons unknown you are willing for Sabien to fail.

SNT is a hard one to have faith in because it does attract the ‘pump and dump’ crew as you put it, but that’s part and parcel of small caps on AIM, and it doesn’t depreciate from the potential here.

Your welcome to your options Sam, and I’ll join you in stamping out any baseless ramps, but the same has to apply to baseless bashing.

If you really want to help would-be investors make an informed decision it’s best to stick to facts, rather than throwing out opinions and extrapolations from a clearly negative biased standpoint.

That’s crazy talk Sam, the warrants are at over a 20% increase from where we are now, we want more cash and we want a new floor.

If and when these warrants are exercised it will be because we’ve left 30p far behind!

What’s the problem Sam? - from your attitude I’m guessing you sold at the bottom, and are hoping to get back in lower, or are just hoping it doesn't keep rising because it would be a kick in teeth!? - We’ve all been there, but it’s not a good look.

I’m all for a realistic approach, but you’re trying to present positives as negatives, so it doesn’t make sense to me that you’re holding?

So you are worried that SNT can raise money at a premium to the current SP!?

What a thing to worry about! ..£2.5m extra cash in the bank, bring it on.

Sambar,

Do you hold? Did you sell? Are you a frustrated LTH?

Don’t get me wrong I don’t think this should be ramped to high heaven, but the news flow that’s started here is tremendously exciting - as far as I’m concerned anyway.

…And actually I am surprised people aren’t getting more excited about the move into carbon trading via blockchain tech - this is an area that plays right into RP’s strengths. Yes it’s very early days on that front but to me it showcases the ambitions of RP ..and the company.

Your pro rata salary argument makes no sense at all, you don’t just guess how much time he’s committing and divide that into what you consider to be a full working week. He is the NEC and his salary is £75k - full stop …and you’re in dreamland if you think he’s just doing the odd half day here and there!

I just struggle to see why your being so negative in such a news-rich period?

No denying the RNS was pretty crud, but the drop was overdone, fuelled by panicked PIs - the sells are not that large. Never sell straight on bad news - you’ll get fleeced.

Will be back above 2p in the not too distant future.

Clearly someone isn’t sticking around for the flow rates… …let’s just hope they don’t already know them!!

I don’t think anyone is waiting to exit at 3p!? - you’d have to be mad to take a binary bet for an extra 10% from the sale price in the past few weeks.

Good flow results could do +100% easily, bad upto -50% IMO.

Telegram group link if anyone is that way inclined…

https://t.me/Blockenergy

I don’t see how people are viewing being paid in shares as a negative!?

The only thing I can think of is people mistakenly thinking the shares are being issued at 0.25p?

This is obviously not the case…