Ben Richardson, CEO at SulNOx, confident they can cost-effectively decarbonise commercial shipping. Watch the video here.
New non exec - Guttridge can now retire - free skating on the pond now.
Can it
having fallen for the theory of the idea with Prox I p ut a few hundred into each of the grandkids accounts - bare trusts.
How nice to see those investments at 99% loss
PIP
The auditors allowed non compliance with 2 IFRSs until it became mandatory.
Harrison was CFO - his fault.
Griffiths was blamed - she left.
Harrison thought an increased income stream was a good idea - BUT he had no surplus cash - so had to borrow.
No smokescreen - just incompetence.
No Camarco no PR
An order book has purported value until it is delivered or cancelled.
Yes Suf
At least that - not that i can use it holiday wise.
PRA cant keep denying divi - we really are being controlled by a load of control freaks.
Is Harold Wilson still here or do we have a Tory Govt.
Qs
H & P
Harry
My reasons are posted earlier in response to Rax comment.
4 CEOs in 8 years - yes I invested from 2012 - Spellman couldn't make it work - left 2013 - then Donnachie - til he retired he got things going - but he had previous - Harrison took over - was CFO - hired Griffiths as CFO. Blackrock had a good stake from the beginning c 2010. Blackrock found out that Harrison was buying pipelines with borrowed money - quite a lot of it. The auditors were not happy with the accounting - ? irfs 25 - Griffiths went - Blackrock dumped their holding - Turner picked most or all. Harrison went.
Harris appointed CFO - never bought a share.
SP at the 2012 level - when I started - mills an opportunist with mates bought a load - tried to stage a coup - failed bcos of Cayman law.
Harris as Ceo. Holder link to Mills and Harwood. Turner and Mills link - get BOD seats.
Who wants what and how it will get sorted - who knows - but a H1 loss of £2.5 m may well lead to a full year loss of £5m
SP will plummet and Turner will pick up all available - y? bcos I dont see Mills buying more.
From a company with a progressive dividend policy - and a promise of a special from the pipeline sale per uncle Phil - to nothing - and the front page of the FCRM web is just net zero carbon.
Sorry CEO
ur buy was less than my sell
That is what token buys mean SFA
without reading I guess my investment - already written down by 99% is worth even less. Why is AIM just a cesspit ?
Rax
Just the 2
James sharp - broker -so clients - similarly Killick & HL.
Going private my real concern. Fusionex delisted and I thought I had lost my money a Malay wanted to buy in and I came out with a 10% profit
My profit in FCRM 30%
Rax
I have sold.
Loss of £2.5m @ H1 - could well be loss of £5m for the year.
No divi likely
A BOD that inspires me not. PR advisor Camarco seems to have been sacked
One or other of the main shareholders will leave - or the Dunamis side will be demerged - the bit Turner wants.
The change from getting hands dirty businesses to green stuff ---and the emphasis on that - not my cup of tea.
Qs about future housebuilding because this shutdown will create havoc - so many unable to pay mortgage. Demand for new builds?
Smart meters - why do we need them? I can read my meters and know my contract prices
Doesnt matter Echo.
The recent news posted by PIP only shows that they will use FCRM to fund what they want.
So my time to get out at a profit.
Echo
50p - lucky if they offer.
I am not surprised Daren left.
We now have no CEO Dugdale in name only a legal aid as Chair and a CFO with limited experience.
Board dominated by harwood and Bayford.
PIP
Reading posts metaphorically may be asking a lot .
I did read the news but got no satisfaction from the jumptech article
Seems this lot want a slice of EV. That will be a cost for a while a long while
As I said b4 - no PR -
I guess Brake(Harwood) and Turner (Bayford) will spend the asset sale cash to foster their interests in EV.
Not good news IMO.
And PIP
The pipe link up is integral to their core business - gas water and electricity - isnt it?
Pip
FCRM had a PR firm - which seems not to fiigure on the RNSs anymore. I spoke to them several times - they told me that the Coy managed disclosure.
When phil was chair we did get output - but now I guess we will get less and less - a COO as CEO taking direction from Harwood and Bayford - a chair who is their pawn as is the CFO .
I need to look at the news more often
thought RNSs were the guide to material benefit
Phps
But we need a CEO with direction .
LTH
Is that here today gone tomorrow.
Reduction in holding ?
Want to invest - review and rewiew again - hope prpit returns and also divi - next yr or after
A fk is just a short term investment!