Member Info for Jimzi

And you said some respect LMAO
You start your high horse and stoop - very pretentious as most can see

Just to add , the small float example has 50% locked in . Which to every Aimer is a golden ticket. Apparently not.
Small share number equals increased volatility- nothing else - whoever holds

and institutions own most of the shares then there are fewer shares to trade hence premium share price..

NSCI still below placing so that theory blown out of the water

My purchases and sales (with Woodford looming ) of HVO varied and significantly accelerated on takeover. Satisfied?

Filter beckoning. Should read closer

And that’s absolute tosh. NSCI. NM Rothschild sold 5 % at 60p and it doubled the next day.

My calculation example is what the whole market is based upon, not your fantasy grasping thesis.

Learn from reality

Dork

The number of shares a company has, has no relationship to a multiple of earnings. You’ve really showed your ignorance . And you’ve saved that post up for ages. LMAO
Here. 5m x 6 pe is the same mcap regardless of how many shares.

Haha. I do

I think you should some respect to people who bought at high levels - boasting about your buy in price ; your whole modus operandi is a disgrace - the filter button beckons.
Pot.

He would have thrown Poolbeg in the bin!

No - peeps who bought higher are fine unless they listen to you .
Todays figures are irrelevant to the educated.

To get court approval for the reduction of capital , he must have proved its currently profitable - otherwise the judge would have declined - able to pay debts - can't if your adding to losses.

Bored with the nonsense now

was the constant moaning about the previous broker targets and how they were responsible for sp dropping and today. with upgraded targets ....................................
Headless chicken day by quite a few audit experts.

Credit where it is due to PF; he clearly is putting alot of effort in.
Still an avoid for me due to the usual caveats he loves
1] the Company continues to monitor funding requirements and options to ensure it has adequate financing in place to deal with the anticipated expansion of services.
2] Ratification - a whole world of hurt is possible esp in Africa
3] No figures so are the costings good or bad - dunno.

Defo better than last week though

Not one comment on the first RNS - anyone read it? - not many investors posting today - they look forward not at [which we were already told wasn't great] the past.

Clues are there

Well it’s impressed that tiddler the Mayo clinic chain - only got net assets of $7b

Warrants init.

They couldn't as they had to use the Melvon overdraft to buy. Ain't got placing cash yet.
Just shy of 5% is fine - won't make a difference if she blows - and they may buy on the open market if stays around 9.2

Cause no one knows what they got.
Anyone buying or selling tomorrow, gives your reasons lol

Indeed; the level of flapping, self doubt and ignorance is hitting new highs [and long winded meaningless guff]

Well I was close, 5m out on the raise and 0.5 out on the price.. Not too bad a price - it was 10 last week,
I think they will increase the % by a percent..
Half the reason for the placing here at 1.3

Concensus.

We want a reasonable discount so its cheaper for us to maintain and its fully underwritten with 15% extra option