Member Info for jimbobtechstock

If anyone missed it, this was out in a late RNS yesterday. Funny time to put it out but mostly we already knew the figures from the prelims. Some interesting bits though, average invoiced value increased from £558 in 2015 to £1,264 in 2016. The deferred orders (which we already knew about from the preliminaries) give 2017 a great head start. Yes, I know, we all know, this needs permanent CEO appointed, but the business goes on until that new strategic lead takes over.

I've read what the company put out. It has cash and is growing, forward-orders and recurring revenue look great. I've invested in about half a dozen unlisted tech companies, as well as dabbling on AIM for best part of a decade and I know the ropes well enough to know my own mind, thank you for your concern. Unfortunately I have to read the BS you're putting out, which is quite frankly non-credible. Multi-millionaire founders don't spend their time bashing a company whose shares they own. They pick up the phone and try and contact the BOD. If that fails they invariably know someone who knows someone who sets up a meet over coffee or beers to discuss their concerns. On the AIM side, this is a play on the SP pure and simple and the bear-raiders let in by sudden CEO departure are here deramping to eek the last dregs from their shorts. Of that I am sure, but yes it's just opinion. Now, final seed I want to sow - that 3 million raise @10p/share. Have the de-rampers ANY IDEA what it takes to arrange a 3 million placing in an AIM smallcap, with no warrants and no death-spiral??? Seriously - it's the clowns trying to win over the simple-minded into selling their shares at a loss. That placing would have involved, at the very least, a site visit, a run through the prospects and sales efforts, the status of ongoing development etc. This is AIM. I'd rather believe the facts. I like to call out the BS because as a holder this is partly my company and I have never met, in real life, anyone who admits to holding shares but ****ging the company off in public. Real people just don't do that. It's counter-productive at the least. So someone claiming to have business acumen certainly wouldn't behave in that way. They would find another channel for their worries instead of trying to scare people out of their shares in some warped view that it will somehow improve the company.

Oh - and anyone with a portfolio that size will know how AIM shares get played. Should never have too large a % in any one AIM company so that's a huge portfolio he runs.

You know one thing that strikes me about CEOs / company owners is their foresight, and optimism.

Thank you. Do f.o.

No you've just been told that when you can't keep pace with the substance of an argument just make sure you're post stays at the top of the thread. "sold my own company" - boiler room 101 mate. Every troll sold their own company. Mostly to the receivers.. lol

OK, the sick bowl is over there in the corner, next to the boiler. Life below floors does tend to bring an unusually large does of sickness. You're talking as if I haven't been doing AIM for 10 years and am on what must be my 5th identity after suffering serious threats over the years from derampers I - correctly, as it turned out - called out as derampers. Get over yourself or your boss will see this and get another crew member onto the board to try a bit harder.

A deramp operation and working the price down. They're using the same template to drag CPX down start of this week, opening gaps down, working the slush behind the scenes to get the price they want.

I think you missed THE point of my message. WHY do you feel obliged to counter the ramps? What compels you, what motivates you, what gets you to your computer to think: I must counter those ramps? Because I'll tell you there are MANY FAR WORSE shares out there than this. In fact I think FBT is probably one of the very good prospects on AIM. It's a proper company, founded by a renowned innovator, with a proper product, in actual use. People who work at the BBC see fit to mention one of the products on their CVs. I didn't see you warning investors about the ramping on that other share you mention, the one that is looking at this point like it was very much close to being fraud? No product but the distribution deal was signed a year or so ago? All that money gone in to "development" over at that company? FBT, has development costs under control, has a decent dev team from what I can see. Yes it has had a setback with its CEO but it's being shorted and you're the voice of the shorter. That's my opinion, I can think of no other reason what you should want to post day in day out on this share. None.

Yes - call it a conspiracy, easy way to trash anyone asking the important question. What are you here? Why do you post so much negativity about a share that you don't own? Answer is obvious to anyone who knows how this works. But you rely on suckering in those too naive to think that all posts on BBs are genuine voice of the investor. Do you work in the same boilerroom as greenhills - because you sound like him. Do you know Pom and Dolphin? Becaue you sound a bit like them too. You're all failed IFAs trying to work the prices to what you want with a bit of spin and it should not be tolerated. It's so transparent yet you come back time and time again with the same crap

Shylock and deramp crew come back to this thread this week. Share gets shaken down a notch. Not a coincidence.

I think Bonkers seems to have largely given up posting on LSE to focus on his TA website. Far fewer posts per day and much more activity on Twitter from what I noticed.

Hopefully they won't follow-through, then... I think it's (hopefully) just the beginnings of a return to something more like normality. Obvious reasosns APC has been unloved for 18 months, but was clear signs the ship steadying and then turning around (last results had every reason for optimism). As confidence returns we will hopefully see return first over 8p then to test 10p - as the mcap right now is still too low for this business IMO and we are being penalised for the lingering doubts over the turnaround. All very much to be expected, of course.

Either that's a worked buy, or the MM needed shares at 6.537p after trading under 6.5p for the previous 2 days. I.e. it doesn't really matter - it's the fact that someone either worked a buy or the MM put a value on a sizeable 700k trade of shares at 6.537p that day. If you think about it though, it's not a worked sell, as not enough shares traded over that price in the preceding sessions or soon after for a P&D. And I'd be very surprised if the MM were taking that many in one go at that price on that day, when the price was only just peeking over 6.5p for the first time in 2 days. So IMO it's either a worked buy, or a neutral NT between buyer and seller.

0.5p placing that's why. RNS missing from LSE but it's on investegate. Lucky Bergen got out in time, huh?!

Wonder if Shylock knows Pomander and Dolphin over on PHE - they have very similar ways with words. I have no issue with shorters per se but this website is doing my nut in over the number of people who post negatively with great frequency and yet claim to not have a position. The reason shorters never admit their position is of course that they are admitting to temporarily increasing the effective share capital, an effect that has to be reversed at some point, therefore admitting to the shorts can bring out the bulls to shake them. It defies logic that all these people are nutjobs - they are therefore motivated, and motivated means they have a reason - probably financial - for talking down these companies.

How much do you know about Stephen Streater? About this technology? Read up on it, it might make you less pessimistic. Yes I know its taken a long time to get here - much more involved that the exponential curve of Eidos, but he's a man who will drive and drive and drive until he gets to where he's heading. To say Apple would be able to do things on their own I think demonstrates a lack of understanding about the software industry. They'll do what they have to - for various reasons, mainly to get things exactly how they want them, they'll do lots in house. But they also buy in when it makes sense. Anyway I'm through with this thread and just about through with this website. 100% transparent pro trader/broker/shorters on an agenda but without the balls to admit their position. Its just too wearing bothering to argue. Have the floor to yourself.

Don't know who's right or wrong, yet. If the price gets back over 10p will you apologise to everyone who sold out in the dip for your overly-pessimistic and dismissive stance? Didn't you once tell me you want the company to do well? Doesn't sound that way right now.

Apple launch FT just now: https://www.ft.com/content/2af92fa2-528e-3ea9-bb15-9303b705fe78 " Apple has joined the competitive social video space, by launching a new app called Clips for iPhones and iPads. According to Apple, the new app will combine short video clips, photos and music into videos that can be shared through the Messages app, or via social networks such as Instagram, and Facebook. The app includes a feature called Live Titles, that lets users create animated captions and titles using their voice. The app will require minimum editing skills. “Clips gives iPhone and iPad users a new way to express themselves through video, and it’s incredibly easy to use,” said Susan Prescott, Apple’s vice president of Apps Product Marketing. “The effects, filters and amazing new Live Titles we’ve designed for Clips let anyone make great-looking, easily sharable videos with just a few taps.” An AI component will allow Clips to suggest who you can share the multi-clip video with, based on who appears in it and who the user shares with the most. "

Ah thanks - must have missed that in the noise. Disruption. No coincidence they're back on that shake. My point being an inverse spike can sometimes be "legitimate", when orders cascade due to stop losses triggering, causing a price fall, which then triggers more. However today we seem to have ended up down in the high 5s without any real selling below 6p. Yes, sure a few sells are classed as buys so maybe the 5.9 trades, but on balance this looks to be MM-driven rather than seller-driven.