Member Info for Ja51

The trouble with that theory is the RNS was so Vague. Is heavy plant coming back in on the 17th to basically carry on with stage 1? Or possibly its a guy with a torque wrench and a grease gun to make sure the well head is in good condition.

Both would satisfy the RNS description. With the freefall of the share price yesterday a simple tweet could stop this.......it hasn't happened so I guess most think with the companies track record option 2 is the likely outcome.

Maybe they may give it a lick of paint as well...lol

True RX
Not sure he can be that bothered about his rep though. Anyone who was concerned on that front surely wouldn't have signed up to Angus after doing any sort of due-diligence....lol

RX There is obviously an issue of some sort. If it was good they would have jumped on it with open arms and let the world know.
From bitter experience Its what they don't say that warrants attention.

Pboo
How do you know that the equipment will arrive in two weeks?
It could be something as simple as a pressure gauge needs changing as it's not showing what they expect!
Tidswell can't do it for a couple of weeks as he's on an Elephant polo excursion and we have to wait for him to return.
Then undoubtedly the 20-day pressure build up and then the meeting with partners .............and on...........and on......... and they are still getting their £1.6 million in wages and expenses!!

Yanis

You could include the RNS's Regarding Lidsey production Stating a fictitious production figure of 191bopd at Lidsey The actual figure per day for March was 14.82 BOED. Mr Vonks interview on vox markets on the 24th April also gives fictitious numbers.
http://www.lse.co.uk/share-regulatory-news.asp?shareprice=ANGS&ArticleCode=fo5grktk&ArticleHeadline=Resumption_of_production_at_Lidsey_and_Brockham

http://www.lse.co.uk/share-regulatory-news.asp?shareprice=ANGS&ArticleCode=d8e73eq3&ArticleHeadline=Angus_Receives_Retention_Approval_For_Lidsey_Field

And of course, the fact that JTP actually signed the Accounts off for Angus Energy Weald basin 1,2, 3 and ANGUS ENERGY HOLDINGS UK LIMITED in March this year. He is still as of today still listed as a director on all 4 companys.

Bad News Fred February the figures go down further.

OS, Esri, HERE, Garmin, NGA, USGS | Esri, HERE
(13 of 22)
Field Production Data, PPRS (WGS84): LIDSEY
Field region
Reporting unit name LIDSEY
Reporting Unit Type Code T
Reporting Unit Type Description Onshore Oil Field
Operator Organisation Group ANGUS ENERGY LIMITED
Onshore,Offshore Flag Onshore
Reporting Period in yyyymm format 201902
Reporting Period Month 02
Reporting Period Month Name Feburary
Reporting Period Year 2019
Oil Production Mass (tonnes) 47.90
Oil Production Volume (m3) 57.50
Oil Production volume (mb/d) 0.01
Oil production density (Kg/m3) 833.00
Dry gas production mass (tonnes)
Dry gas production volume (ksm3)
Dry Gas Production volume (MMscf/d)
Dry Gas Production Density (kg/sm3)
Associated gas production mass (tonnes) 0.00
Associated Gas Production Volume (MMscf/d) 0.00
Associated Gas Production Volume (ksm3) 0.00
Associated Gas Production density (kg/sm3) 0.00
Gas Condensate mass (kg)
Gas condensate volume (ksm3)
Gas condensate volume (mb/d)
Gas condensate density (kg/sm3)
Injected water mass (tonnes) 0.00
Injected water volume (m3) 0.00
Injected water volume (mb/d) 0.00
Water production mass (tonnes) 14.50
Water production volume (ksm3) 14.50
Water production volume (mb/d) 0.00

https://data-ogauthority.opendata.arcgis.com/pages/production

14.39 BOED Oil produced
4.61 BOED Water produced

https://data-ogauthority.opendata.arcgis.com/pages/production

Totally agree Weald power.
You can quite easily prove mr Vonk lied by his interview with Vox markets late April last year regarding Lidsey production.

Ermmm...... Alan it was you who stated that they may be after the gas project for the water injector!! Why if it's a none issue as you are now Suggesting.

The document is a comprehensive study into by the EA and in conjunction with all the other agencies titled "Reinjection of fluids to deep geological formations"..... How much more specific to the topic could it be.

The EA will have withdrawn permission to Re-inject at Brockam based on the document. As I say all the information is there and for any that can't be bothered read pages 15 to the mid '20s.

I would suggest Angus failed to answer the EA's questions as they couldn't . Not without letting the cat out of the Bag about a serious issue.
Once you read the document you will be aware that they must submit where RE-Injection is to take place. In there FDP I assume they would have listed Brocham X2 as the Re-injector well and are now stuck as to where to put the inevitable water cut to follow!

If you are such an expert you know perfectly well there will be need of a water re-injection well,i suggest all your disciples do a bit of research and read it for themselves before clicking the like button.

Really Alan2017?
So what is the legislation as you understand it then??. The document i attached gives all the information pertinent if you are willing to read it!

Can I ask you as an expert where the nearest disposal site for water produced is situated to Brockam or Lidsey for that matter?

We know from the articles of association that Angus pays £50,000 per Annum to the landowner for the Re-injection writes at Brockham.
This could well be the reason for the conversation with the partners if they know there is likely to be water cut with any oil should they actually get to the point of production.

rxdav
Look out for a little red dot!! JTW could try and take you out first!! Christ I just made all the roofers in the country nervous!

Interesting to see Mr 1000 bopd recognising the water injection problem at last!
Unfortunately, his idea of trucking it 300 miles to re-inject doesn't wash as the information below sets out. The water can only be re-injected into the same formation.
Nice to see something I was called a troll for pointing out finally coming to the surface though!
https://assets.publishing.service.gov.uk/government/uploads/system/uploads/attachment_data/file/650275/Minimising_risks_from_fluid_reinjection_to_deep_geological_formations_-_report.pdf

Welcome to the rebel alliance dath wolf!!....

CS33
Very good and all correct for producing from the Portland ON X2 (not producing as donkey removed due to water cut issues most likely)........But that production licence does not apply to the Kimmeridge which is what they are targeting at present.....Maybe?...lol.

As you are a new poster the attached will give you all the info you need.

https://www.whatdotheyknow.com/request/523935/response/1277768/attach/4/brockfdpadd%20Redacted.pdf?cookie_passthrough=1

Angus only have a Production TESTING licence. They are restricted By the OGA, and as to what they can produce.
SCC have begrudgingly issued testing planning permission.
They do not have an unrestricted production licence as they are only at the testing and appraisal stage.
https://www.whatdotheyknow.com/request/424952/response/1066246/attach/5/Scan2017%2009%2004%202925%20001.pdf?cookie_passthrough=1

https://www.whatdotheyknow.com/request/523935/response/1277768/attach/5/brockprodconsred.pdf?cookie_passthrough=1
See the last page for restrictions on oil and gas production!

CS33

You are quite correct in your statement! You being a prime example. Please follow the links.
There are plenty more as well DYOR

https://mycouncil.surreycc.gov.uk/documents/s49623/BROCKHAM.pdf
http://www.angusenergy.co.uk/documents/oga/WONS%20Consent%20(11).pdf

KenniGT
Angus has a production TESTING licence for the Kimeridge X4Z a very different thing to a full production licence.
They do have a production licence for the portland which they have stopped producing from due to the lack of a water injector well.....Lidsey dito as they used Brockam to inject the water from also.
Zero production at the moment!!

OGA figures finally updated

No oil at all produced for the last reported months December or January!!!!

https://data-ogauthority.opendata.arcgis.com/pages/production

Renegade
The question should be why are you still here??
You have defended every shocking decision by this company and attacked any poster who dares questions the shocking management and pump and dump brigade.
Makes me wonder if your not the one giving interviews at investor shows dressed as an extra out of game of thrones??...lol

Alan
I see you can now claim”as featured in drill or drop”