Charles Jillings, CEO of Utilico, energized by strong economic momentum across Latin America. Watch the video here.
Playing devils advocate indeed, not. You are fabricating a situation so you can get another top-up at a lower price or you are lonely and want another "discussion". Time after time same old strategy. boring, boring, boring. Ruined the board you have.
My understanding is that our case is with Maxwell and not with UCAP or anyone else. Maxwell have an mcap of USD200m. Are you saying we have made a further claim against UCAP already? Or are you saying Maxwell is a startup? What is the question? But on the plus side you actually did some research. Still getting back off the floor me.
Sorry if this bores you but I am interested in these tiny trades. Since a 52k trade at full printed ask there have been larger trades of 269k,268k, 150k, 55k & 52k which are a tadish less the bid/ask average but the bid/ask is as it was before the 52k trade. "normally" one would think these apparent sells would drop the sp, but no. Is it the number of these tiny (101) apparent buy trades that are influencing the algorithms that there is demand to keep the sp up? or is it as I posted yesterday? Surprised maybe, Bonker99? maybe? can help?
No Open, I really really don't believe you have multiple accounts, I have said this many times. You have enough trouble remembering what you post on one. That is why I said it was it weird. Classic123 is a real tease then, pretending to be you and replying for you. This board is nearly pointless these days, a few notable exceptions of course. I wish their (much more valuable) posts weren't lost in under a pile of ****.
Could it be some automatic trading platform either checking its logic to trade or has its config data a little messed up. Or could it be someone trying to reduce the average trade to disguise the larger trades going through to keep the price lower. Or maybe someone has a lot of time on their hands for not much value? Or maybe it is a trading tutorial with the wrong parameters. Or maybe is it OPEN spending his bingo winnings.
OPEN is not to be trusted despite his "clever" wordsmithery he has been caught out being disingenuous many times. He has also increased his holding whilst talking down everything to do with the company at any opportunity. He admits to knowing nothing of the product or investing. He couldn't handle multiple accounts, he likes to post on here for the banter ffs. Not much else to do in LA I suppose.
OPEN not everyone continually criticises the share, the Bod, the IP, defending the IP, the OM, the licensing strategy, the move to in-house production... everything without a positive word about anything business related whilst in parallel increasing their holding . Not everyone repeats negative opinions ad-infinitum whilst obviously not believing in any of them and then tries to defend them as real beliefs whilst in parallel increasing their holding. Being patronising isn't going to help you recover any credibility, trying to play the victim card wont work either. Maybe read your owns posts so you don't forget what you said previously, help yourself by not digging a bigger hole. Obviously everyone's opinions are most welcome and encouraged, if they are honestly held though of course. A balanced board is the best board.
OPEN not everyone continually criticises the share, the Bod, the IP, defending the IP, the OM, the licensing strategy, the move to in-house production... everything without a positive word about anything business related whilst in parallel increasing their holding . Not everyone repeats negative opinions ad-infinitum whilst obviously not believing in any of them and then tries to defend them as real beliefs whilst in parallel increasing their holding. Being patronising isn't going to help you recover any credibility, trying to play the victim card wont work either. Maybe read your owns posts so you don't forget what you said previously, help yourself by not digging a bigger hole. Obviously everyone's opinions are most welcome and encouraged, if they are honestly held though of course. A balanced board is the best board.
OPEN you being branded a numpty are your own words but for once I agree with you. It is wholly down to the way the market yourself, but as you understand marketing then I suppose you have done that on purpose and you are here for sympathy and the feeling of belonging. Most group animals are more successful if they don't continually try to hack off the rest of the group.
"...does somebody know something ?"
Yes OPEN, we know you are thoroughly disingenuous and profess to have opinions that even you don't believe in. You have a long way to go before to get any credibility at all. This forum is not a school debating society. Wise up.
Earlier there was this :- ORDER Rescheduling Video Mediation Conference: The video mediation conference previously set in this matter for 10/19/2021 is RESCHEDULED to 1/12/2022 at 10:00 AM before Judge Sherry R. Fallon. Signed by Judge Sherry R. Fallon on 10/15/2021.
Where is it written there is a Markman hearing today or tomorrow?
I read this is the latest :- ORAL ORDER Setting Teleconference: The Court has reviewed the Motion for Teleconference to Resolve Discovery Dispute (D.I. [72]). A dispute teleconference is scheduled for November 15, 2021 at 3:00 PM Eastern Time before Judge Jennifer L. Hall. By no later than November 1, 2021 the party(ies) seeking relief shall file with the Court a letter, not to exceed three pages, in no less than 12-point font, outlining the issues in dispute and its position on those issues. By no later than November 8, 2021 any party(ies) opposing the application for relief may file a letter, not to exceed three pages, in no less than 12-point font, outlining that party's reasons for its opposition. Counsel is reminded to provide courtesy copies. Counsel shall send dial-in information directly to the Court, no later than 24 hours prior to the hearing, using the following e-mail address: Cailah_Garfinkel@ded.uscourts.gov. The Court may choose to resolve the dispute prior to the telephone conference and will, in that event, cancel the conference. ORDERED by Judge Jennifer L. Hall on 10/25/2021.