Member Info for insightking

Hi all,

Branching on RBK's point, in relation to coin focus, it is key we pick the coin for the future. We are limited to hard forks stemming from BTC as we proceed under SHA, therefore due to BTC being the first of its kind; and having a few flaws in-term of transparency (as you can still follow transactions back to the senders wallet, not so concealed after all) I don't believe when we mine with our own hardware and software QBT would entertain BTC. I believe that we would go for a more private coin that is a hard fork of BTC. As this is due to the fact that clients would want privacy. Thus Zcash which is still at its early stages and follows the same trajectory as BTC would be a suitable fix. Especially as the privacy behind the coin conceals and mitigates any way of tracing any tractions.
Furthermore, the coin is much more profitable when mined, and the difficulty is very low proving easier to accumulate.

Kind regards,

Hi RKB,

I have heard a lot about you, and I must say that it's always nice to see your very knowledgeable posts; how was FG this morning was he very positive ?

Kind regards,

Apologies I meant per quarter

Hi all,

I believe the share price is consolidating before its next leg up. I would like to note that and pin this to your boards Argo will most likely acquire QBT's software in order to reduce cost massively; for ever 4 miners one would essentially run free on the current difficulty of BTC (and when it comes back to normality).

Kind regards,

Hi all,

Would like to note the RNS + the interview was excellent and it seems that QBT are in the process of filing the patent before it unveils the inked contracts; remember an IP only needs to be registered and not approved in order to protect QBT's software. I believe this is the game plan. the break-out is at 1.30 and I expect news of the IP being filed will happen no later than the end of this month followed by what we have all been waiting for.

I would like to note that I believe our first partner will be an American firm followed by Argo who are in need of us due to there 2 year lease on their recently sold facility; therefore, they would need to accumulate as many BTC over the 2 years (I expect this is due to the halving taking place next year which will catapult the value). please bear in mind will will most likely take a % in royalty for these firms acquiring our software.

A conservative example would be 5% of all mined coins; therefore if this was applied to Argo who mine on average 860 BTC per month QBT would take 43 of those for giving a 30% improvement in efficiency; 43 BTC at current market value it at £602K a month (from only 1 contractor) and bearing in mind majority of that will be project; furthermore taking into consideration a general valuation of a company is 10x, you do the math on the current project for where this share price should be.

Kind regards,

Happy new year everyone. Good news is imminent.

Hi All,

As mentioned an RNS will drop before Christmas, please like everyone allow your curiosity to question why an option of 5p has an expiry early of next year.

Should be straightforward.

Kind regards,

Hi Starship,

Your story was somewhat credible (not really), but you cannot partner with Chinese miner, as it is outright banned in the country. Hence why all miners relocated over to USA, Serbia, Kazakhstan, and Russia.

Kind regards,

Hi Steve,

And I could tell you everything.

Kind regards,

Hi Addison,

No worries we all have bad days, me included. It is a shame what happened to Argo but, if they survive the crypto winter I believe they have a chance of turning this around.

Also the news will come its about holding your emotion in this case, I am currently sitting on a loss but know that the company are trying to achieve and if they achieve even a fraction of what they trial then this SP will only rise into new territory. The only reason why I know this is because I used to be a miner and understand that brute force used in POW is note feasible.

Kind regards,

Hi Steve,

on the same breath you didn't refute being steve - o from jackass. I don't care what you call me because what will come of it ?
I will say my name isn't "Jake" then you will say it is, then what?....... good convo

Lastly I answered Addison's queries, the only one that you are more concerned with is who I am, I will tell you my name if you give me your wife and daughters full name

Kind regards,

Hi Steve,

I still see it and so did you, I guess you have no response to your own thought process. I wonder what you will pair my name with next.

Kind regards,

Hi Steve,

So your evidence is googling my name with an investment bank. I believe you are a lost cause. If we use your philosophy then googling Steve and bell-end would probably conjure something from the movie/series Jackass ; so is that you ?

Kind regards,

Hi Addison,

Yes, I agree, very waffly paragraph, I must say it feels like a copy and paste.
But in short, POW has always been about brute force hashing to solve a block. However you are correct in referencing the current difficulty level as I believe this hindered FG from committing to the 30% improvement using QBT software. As I believe he has achieved 30% on the current difficulty however, it's now about proving the capability of the upgrade against a much higher difficulty and the point of where the algo becomes a norm and requires a further upgrade. But by that time I can see QBT transitioning over to quantum computing.

kind regards,

Hi RachelsDad,

I believe that QBT are working hard behind the scenes, as you can respect its in their best interest to get result out as soon as possible. This is also due to the options at 5 & 10p also please note the main employees working for QBT are paid in share/options too.

I understand from the news that QBT are testing using an S19, and from my analysis it seems there is a likely tie in with another firm that would obtain the software; via the licensing agreement hence why FG failed to comment on this during his interview (NDA).

In regards to RNS I know that there is news imminent in relation to verification, licensing, and also litigation.

Kind regards,

Hi Addison,

So the verification will not be carried out in-house as this would not be credible (I think everyone knows this), but the last interview and RNS FG has mentioned QBT have obtained S19 miners to test the SHA 256 algo.

In regards to the remaining part of your queries:
1) Who am I ? buy me a drink first
2)where am I getting my information from? if you knew what POW mining was about you would understand the process.
3)Pump and dump? I believe this and "support triangle" are the only two terms you know.

Kind regards,

I'd also like to note in reference to your comment, there's no such thing as a "support triangle". This isn't a counseling session

Hi Addison
I guess you envy people that can carry out a technical analysis but, its okay if you think they are fake triangles, because you definitely are not fooling anyone with that fake laugh "haha".

Kind regards,

Hi Sebo,

QBT generally release 2 RNS's per month, also to confirm testing results shouldn't take to long to do the main issue would of been equipment however, they were able to obtain S19 miners the latter part of last month. So results should be concrete by now.

Kind regards

Hi All,

I have got the support at 1.13pence, QBT broke out of the descending triangle last week and it is only natural for the SP to fall to retest its new support level at 1.13. I believe it will not go any further below this level as it is now reaching the oversold region on the weekly and will now push to 1.86pence and once news drops this side of Christmas 2.99pence.

Kind regards,

Jay