Member Info for inanaco

stabilisation of camera's fitted to a Jet turbine Helicopter with a 30kg lift capacity ... using inertial guidance and GPS the for runner to the drones u see now .

won a smart award £50,000 .. from Gov ...

My posts are not about seeking attention ... what they do is thwart attention seekers ... kettle black

you have no evidence in your history that supports any science based discussion in which you lead

not seen any evidence of you understanding Insider trading rules and how it applies at AGM in what Directors can say

i see no evidence of you understanding NDA agreements which are put in place when signing collaboration agreements

I could go on .. as covers are on ... but getting a bit tedious ..

these are your words not mine

"""""But I stick to the point that management and the Board should also put on a business hat from time to time in addition to acting like academics.""""

"""A few questions:
- what does DC stand for?
- if the approaches are similar, where do SCLP's competitive advantages lie (if any)? As importantly, are such competitive advantages protected by patents?
- got a bit lost with Inanaco's 16:07 post ... broadly speaking, is the idea to get the virus stuck on the surface of a cell and not let it go inside the cell to destroy it?
- oh, and are the HLA phenotypes the places on the cells where the virus binds to something? """"

if you feel you have a better grasp of the science, then maybe folks should divert technical questions to you ...

ATB

of to watch the Cricket ...

PS ... nobody appears to want to lend you shares ...

commerce only exists if you have something to bring to the table ...

the drivel that comes out of some posters is astonishing ............

the Regulations that scancell has to adhere to on the academic side dwarf any red tape that the commercial side has to contend with

so you are not supportive of ...

""""The aim of my post was to see to what extent other investors had similar thoughts about issues related to the overall management style in order to bring them up at the AGM in a concerted way. """"

ATB

I tried to tease out explanations of his posts last night ...

and i have not dismissed his view .. please show a post that does that ...

you need to Commit your shares to Michael .. how many do you have ??

you can be first on the list

lozan asks ... "what rebellion "

""""The aim of my post was to see to what extent other investors had similar thoughts about issues related to the overall management style in order to bring them up at the AGM in a concerted way. """"

posted Last Night ...

so lets see those that REC the post ... commit your shares to Micheal ...

should be interesting

didn't see those in his list Ruck

anyway you have a friend ... ATB

""That the negative posters can appreciate and who incites a little rebellion ""

how ever ... Micheal regards Lindy as "acting as an Academic"

considering he has been in the shares For "years" ..apparently ...

how on earth he can make that comment when the guy does NOT have a clue about the science of scancell ...

sometimes Ruck a little research into a party goes a long way to asses what wine they bring ...

Sour ... is not appreciated by the connoisseurs of the science or commercial businessmen in general

so its best you give him privilege over your shares so that he can stir it up at an AGM ...

i suspect he would need at least 80m to achieve any sort of influence

by the way he has put out this sort of nonsense before ...

"""""But I stick to the point that management and the Board should also put on a business hat from time to time in addition to acting like academics.""""

"""A few questions:
- what does DC stand for?
- if the approaches are similar, where do SCLP's competitive advantages lie (if any)? As importantly, are such competitive advantages protected by patents?
- got a bit lost with Inanaco's 16:07 post ... broadly speaking, is the idea to get the virus stuck on the surface of a cell and not let it go inside the cell to destroy it?
- oh, and are the HLA phenotypes the places on the cells where the virus binds to something? """"

anyway i will leave it at that ... I consider he is not up to the job of leading a "rebellion" ... time will tell

Cricket ...

yes Bermuda .......... but what are you Missing ? what are we missing

what is the piece that will drive the SP ...

after all we have established the market has a problem

hence .................... """"why it values the company at this ludicrous level""""

probably the greatest exponent of PR is Bunsie ...

and he don't know either ....

Ivy
i listened to the transcripts .. so I don't need to attend AGM as well, its a 4/5 hr drive from here, and Lindy will communicate with me on the heavy stuff .. no idea How the "petrol issue" has got into your head .. for a Start i drive Diesel BMW's

LOL

not at all ... just trying to define what you actually mean ...

you describe somebody that should not be on the BOD ... but you will not tell us ...

and you have suggested we ask the market

but explained no route ?

But Ivy ...
your post only got 1 rec ?

i can string the entire thread into one part ............ its called the Puzzle .. and folks keep trying to blame different areas but cant quite manage to or don't know how to express it .... they want more but the constraints of PLC's ... dont allow that

and its this bit

""""why it values the company at this ludicrous level""""

Nobody can understand it ... and that is why folks get frustrated

intrigued ... Bermuda ... indeed the recent PR inc National TV resulted in ? probably more confusion because now the GOV has been put under the spot light via the lack of Funding ...
I have said this many times ...

PR to investors . ? = Dr Kim .. do we need that constant Grandstanding which then flops

"""The aim of my post was to see to what extent other investors had similar thoughts about issues related to the overall management style in order to bring them up at the AGM in a concerted way. """

that will never work from just posters on here, for a start quite a few of the questions you would like answered are price sensitive or locked in via Non Disclosure ...........

you then posted

"""So you may also want to question the market why it values the company at this ludicrous level""

and how do we do that exactly ??

yes but you have not answered the question

""However, those more interested in academic research or not keen to be more communicative, should stay in research rather than be part of the management team of a listed company. """

who are you talking about ?

Bermuda ref "good points"

What are they ? ..

At AGMs I have found them very defensive...........

probably because all you ask them about is Funding ....

"previous discussions in history" .... result .. Ivy expects to receive an answer that the BOD cannot Give ...

""" We are not backing a group of academics who are keen to publish papers on their area of expertise - such contributions are essential too in medical fields or biotech and wouldn't wish to underestimate their importance. However, those more interested in academic research or not keen to be more communicative, should stay in research rather than be part of the management team of a listed company. """

who are you referring to ? Micheal ..