Member Info for inanaco

This is not an SiPTM ... that's another patent

""" Together these offer a complementary platform """

" modification of the constant region (FC) of a human antibody to allow direct tumour killing" Its all about turning a tumour HOT ... basically what could be interesting is that this approach may well be at the very start of the natural cycle of an immune response at the innate stage to flip the environment to inflammation ...... again that word !!

can you print the post Hotswings ... is that recent ? only you posted the cash raise would be single figures

The antibody-dependent cell-mediated cytotoxicity (ADCC), also referred to as antibody-dependent cellular cytotoxicity, is a mechanism of cell-mediated immune defense whereby an effector cell of the immune system actively lyses a target cell, whose membrane-surface antigens have been bound by specific antibodies.[1] It is one of the mechanisms through which antibodies, as part of the humoral immune response, can act to limit and contain infection.[2] ADCC is independent of the immune complement system that also lyses targets but does not require any other cell. ADCC requires an effector cell which classically is known to be natural killer (NK) cells that typically interact with IgG antibodies.[3] However, macrophages, neutrophils and eosinophils can also mediate ADCC, such as eosinophils killing certain parasitic worms known as helminths via IgE antibodies.[4] ADCC is part of the adaptive immune response due to its dependence on a prior antibody response. The coating of target cells with antibodies is sometimes referred to as opsonization.

Spot on Boom..... totally agree with that, Scancell ill now submit the IND i expect quickly with the SP recovering and the chance if you qualify to buy at 12p as well

always falls back to inflammation ........

IMM is proving just how cheap Scancell really is ......... Mcaps says it al

TF, its all about the money ... remind yourself how you found scancell ..

ONW exactly ... which is why i always push you hard to direct ALL your posts to Scancel area l not the Bio market sector in General ... is to broad .. and you cannot say that i have not, giving you every opportunity to do just that

Its not the IMM BB ........ suggest you take your issues there, certainly not gloating .... just pointing out that when questions where asked .. You got your back up ..

Boom you made a point about Bio Sentiment ......... which Ivy supported, but the evidence is Scancell is up not down. sometimes folks convince themselves of the importance of something .. when in reality each stock stands on its own IP

you mean your sentiment ? Any one understanding Scancells science is completely fired up with its direction of travel .....

Boomorbust, I am pointing out that YOU fire up at any discussion that YOU feel threatens your investments, yet that discussion which YOU fail to discuss could actually save your � in your pocket. if you wish reprints of case in point i can do that. I would also remind you that you dont feel "reasoned" discussions are the way forward when discussing the science. Again multiple instances of this on the BB, you sacrifice "HARMONY" for valuable discussion. Which is why the BB became dysfunctional ..

Fact ..... Cd4 T cells that have killing ability have been detected in Patients (virus load) Fact ...... Immunobody does induce memory and inflammation FACT onconsec has just released its combo data showing synergy with PD1, so how can Scib1 plus Pd1 not work ?? just not possible to have a failure ... it would require a systemic failure of the immune system

"nothing is assured" you clearly don't understand how this science functions C7 interferon gamma is what its all about ... inflammation Scancell only directs the immune system ....... that is all for Scancell to fail the immune system would fail .. completely Tick Tock ....

is ask the questions .......... IMM 1/ Early trial had issue before with the strength of the placebo effect. 2/ The recent cancer trial failed. 3/ The �10m cash raise The warning is this, every time i tried to discuss IMM, Val or MTFB ... i got shot down !! .... That will not happen on this BB, which is why I welcome any "reasoned discussion" That's negative. It protects my investment, if i debate it. Which is why i ignore those that feel Harmony is the better prescription. However Trolls like Tosh just don't have the technical ability to debate the science as such have no choice but to spread Risk, because they don't understand what they are buying into. Scancells science has been absolutely scrutinised by this BB and External Experts. Tick Tock ...

Why would we see CRUK involvement as great news and the Grand Challenge Yet big pharma would ignore Scancell ? From history we know that Big Pharma follows each other as advances occur you only have to look at the PD1 market But the Moditope is a land grab patent ... ouch ! they cannot follow without deals

what issues ? we are more Validated than ever ... But explain Roche involvement ... in Modi 3 ? ISA announced deal Bio N tech announced deal

your in panic mode Tosh ... Hot-sings