Member Info for HPOW-2026

>>>If the crackers also sell now (certification in December, I believe), then we'll have revenues in the millions and will have more or less made it<<<

I believe the CE issue is on the table as of August, this could be a reason for the ongoing delay, fingers crossed that is indeed the reason ....

>>>The cost reimbursement from the S&P 500 partner won't have been received yet, as this usually happens after the project is completed!<<<

Sorry b.b, i'm slightly confused here, how is payment then possible at all? This mystery partnership is meant to be part of an ONGOING linear production line (if memory saves me well), and the JV name wasn't to be released as there were worries regarding that the corporate IP could be copied by the next best competitor...but you now say this JV is based on a "project by project basis"?

I think Wilson needs to get out of that comfy CEO chair and start talking to the marketplace about this partnership (high level general terms of course) , as there are way too many permutations on the table, that just leave us all guessing at this point in time, one solid year later, such a move could also add to his "corporate credulity" moving forward.

>>>This is being complemented by introductions being made by our S&P 500 partner<<<

The proof is in the pudding- (or rather official sales numbers resulting from same)- we have had enough 'hot air CEO's at the helm of this company, Actions speak louder than mere words.

...he has only been linked with boring industrial product companies to date, which basically (screws, peripheries, nuts & bolts bizz) require absolutely no spotlight on production ramp up's, co-op partners, future vision, TALKING to your marketplace & shareholders on a regular basis.

I feel JW "assumes" he is the master of timing regarding all RNS releases, and unfortunately, just because he owns a substantial batch of stock, is convinced his timing is immaculate and couldn't be improved on- I am not convinced he is right-and FD Bostock is just his financial 'nodder' , no personality, no drive, never any additional input to Wilsons 'still waters are best' information approach.

His first interview with shareholders & investment companies as newly announced CEO (at the then AFC Energy) brought out the comment:-

"Now that's a little punchy" -as a disappointed shareholder aired their views, well John, maybe that's exactly what your missing, become a little more openly "punchy" - and inform your shareholders about relevant corporate developments outside of AGM window space.

I feel you still have a lot to learn, but hey, prove me wrong with pleasure....starting with a corporate interview with our future S&P partner (get over yourselves being more important than the market itself)- now that would be effective marketing, whilst we the shareholders, could get some trust instilled, that you may indeed be more than a paler version of Adam Bond (without the Aussie accent)

3 upcoming events to promote a major ITM turnaround by September:- (and break the shorts backs finally)

Chronos Funding: The UK Competition and Markets Authority is deciding on subsidies totaling £46.5 million. The funds will go toward the next generation of electrolysers.

HAR2 Auction: The UK is allocating hydrogen capacity of up to 875 megawatts. ITM Power is already listed as the preferred supplier for two projects.

Uniper Project: The final investment decision is pending for the Humber H2ub in Killingholme. ITM Power is set to initially supply six modules, each with a capacity of 20 megawatts.

If this all comes to pass, then Jeffries 200pence may look like a lukewarm recommendation in hindsight.

I'm an agressive buyer, at these very much watered down current levels (pre Sept news)

Nice one maximilion, at least this proves that Tamgo is still knocking on the door post re-branding.

I like!

@w4ttsy, thx for the response, you may well be right.

@ShineOnYou, thanks for your 'pre puberty mention'-IGNORE

Thx for the response @w4ttsy, you may well be right.

@the

@w4ttsy, >>>I've seen many a timeline missed but JW hasn't missed one yet so get off his back and stop moaning<<<

Sorry, but I beg to differ:- JW (and FD Bostock), communally claimed that they would be able to name the mysterious S&P Partner now AHEAD of schedule, as rapid progress was being made with regard to linear integration, copyright issues & cost sharing. His initial comment regrading the partnership was made on June, 4th 2025....

Hence, he is way 'off his very own music' with regards to naming the 'knight in shining armour', Wilson currently runs in danger of getting mixed up with ex CEO Bond's manifold deadlines- and no-i'm not a short, but I have been here long enough to be rather wary about timelines and promises made, whilst sitting on a proverbial mountain stock.

I sincerely hope JW has the Corporate antenna to pick up on the handling of such matters under the newly donned cloak of H-Power.

>>>I actually made an oooooooo noise when i saw the RNS 1 symbol….. read, thought FFs, then read your comment and laughed. Three emotions in 10 seconds<<<

Ditto Lord, I wonder if Wilson & Bostock actually 'understand' your comment/posting, they both represent the proverbial- "two snails in a pod":-)

Well, that being said ...CEO's like John Wilson (especially after replacing a chronic liar in Bon), should not be making statements with regard to upcoming JV partners ("to be announced, sooner than we expected" was his last comment with a mike held under his nose.

That could also be regarded as being "slippery", especially whilst considering the AFC leadership role he has inherited from Bond, I genuinely hope he truly realises his ongoing silence in this matter is basically his very own version of >>>Well, Trump did release the Epstein files<<<

...or then again, did he really?

Personally knowing a hedge fund manager, who actively engages such 'literate talent's, depending on his position in any given stock, also considering how liquid the stock issue itself may be, and often with an eye on upcoming market moving events/ corporate news ...which 'could' indeed be the case with regard to HPOW by the start of Q3/26.

I actually agree with most of your 'ridiculous' bullet-points... unfortunately, one of which being absolutely point-blank wrong!

#Ridiculous is saying that there are people paid by Helikon on here#

...that's not at all ridiculous, this forum -(and indeed many others here at LSE)- are absolutely infested with such negative paid content creatures, many of whom are low aptitude students who prefer to scour the boards for their fiscal managers, rather than put in an honest shift on building sites-as it once used to be back in the day.

I agree with you 'in part', but I also pay a significant part of JW's ongoing salary. I wasn't consulted, he was merely installed.

I do so-partially pay his weekly wages -in the corporate expectancy, that the new company leader realises whose shoes he is stepping into, and hence, when he makes promises to his remaining shareholders of days gone by, that he truly realises(post Bond) it is now about "Promises made, promises delivered". Should he perhaps not have the corporate sensitivity after stints at Belgin & Co (very few communication skills required to produce basic components at scale on a daily basis), then he should quickly adjust to his new corporate surroundings , and update his shareholder base with regard to "ongoing progress", that is exactly how you build trust, not in blurting out some hot air about an imminent JV, and then retreating into your silent zone once again as if on a monks retreat. A full year has passed, I now duly expect "more", if not fiscal results, then at least updated progress reports from the front. My share holding says I am indeed entitled to same, whether Mr. Wilson believes this, or not.

Let's go, after all, it's mid 2026 already...

(I'm convinced there is no S&P partner nor never was! Would love to be proved wrong)

Well, if that's truly the case, Wilson has then lied about upcoming joint venture events on camera, there could be a nasty legal repercussion in form of a class action lawsuit. I am certainly not prepared to live with a CEO style Bond 2.0

Well the conference does only finish today, but its deffo high time Wilson delivers on promises made, he's already starting to smell like a "Corporate Donald Trump", lots of hot air promises, fewer allies by the day, and downright lying just to remain at the helm.

Get your act(s) together, Wilson+ Bostock (ASAP), we didn't buy this share just because of your well starched shirts, how about some delivery?

I must say, I do like your reasoning- that being said, only Rendall & Walker appear to be 'on site' in Rotterdam.

Is that enough Corporate firepower to represent such a major announcement moving forward?

I certainly hope you are right.

This waiting game regarding "the players name" is just getting a tad too long in the tooth, he himself, Wilson, promised an earlier than previously expected market announcement- and yet here we are once again, mid May, lighting candles!

Wilson appears to underestimate AFC's 'non delivery history' on promises made, under Bonds previous leadership.

Wilson should now deliver the S&P Players data. Enough time has now passed (even based on his own timeline comments) that AFC/H-Power could present/announce the partner "ahead of schedule". We shareholders have endured enough waiting for 'relevations' under Bonds leadership (if you could call it that).

Wilson shouldn't underestimate his inherited shareholder base, we have been through the wars, and now duly expect delivery on promises made!