upanchors yr ii posts re cosl rig28 Nov 2016 08:23
etc not really relevant, except to the degree of optimism put behind their successful conclusion, that's past. The gensets were destined for the RN when that rig's original configuration was to be as per fsp/ssp a combination drilling and production mode.
Mgt's stupidity in not running their plans positively first past decc when the ON was still on hire left them, with the RN committed and paid for but no approved fdp, no option but floating this expensive ewt past decc for approval, hoodwinking shareholders in the process as to the c*** up.
The problems basically begin and end with funding and the incompetence shown thereby by the man specifically responsible for that, the cfo/ceo, going back to the exec stock sale, yorkville, rbl, the change to three years of bonds purgatory, and the incredible incompetence of giving away the farm in connection with that.
The mou deals in the end probably in the current environment not bad, esp that for cosl and teekay, they would greatly have reduced capex. The problem is despite that xel had no funding available even for the smaller requirement that would have allowed fdp to be progressed. Hence everything fell apart, with the blame for same entirely lying with the man responsible, the ceo. Jmo.