The next focusIR Investor Webinar takes places on 14th May with guest speakers from Blue Whale Growth Fund, Taseko Mines, Kavango Resources and CQS Natural Resources fund. Please register here.
Data from 6 women is a bit of an exaggeration :P
" Actual activity monitored by the Onitor® Track, such as the step count and heart rate, was not available for analysis. "
They might as well have worn Silicone Wristbands.
millions spent and this is it? This is what you have been waiting for? This is the key to unlocking the value?
Finally the long awaited Msci paper.
15 overweight and obese women took part. Could it be any smaller?
The reason for these high attrition rates and programme adherence found in other studies is not clear, but within this study, 78?per cent reported leaving due to technical issues with the Onitor® Track test unit and/or app.
I called the onitor a glorified step counter. I wonder now if even calling it a step counter is fair. 3000 vs 5000 steps reported, I wonder which device was more accurate.
"Accessibility
Having access to instant feedback from the wearable is a preferred option, with many expressing that the Onitor® Track wristband lacks this. For example,
You can’t really see anything. There’s nothing else to really look at. You need to log in, whereas with your Fitbit, you can push the button or tap it and it tells you how much steps you’ve done at a glance. (Ann)
I would have preferred something on the device itself to just be able to have a quick check, rather than having to go into another device to have to see how I was doing. I don’t think I would have bought it if I had thought I’d have to look at my phone every time I wanted to check how I was doing. (Susan)"
"[Regarding the Onitor® Track] To be honest, it is very basic the way it reports . . . it just shows you as a bar, but for e.g. my pacer, you could see some sort of statistical analysis, what’s happening, in a day, in a week, in a month and it gives you much more information compared to what you see there. (Gemma)"
"Further investigations are required to assess the feasibility of the Onitor® Track, due to the wide range of technical issues experienced, which hindered compliance and engagement. "
"The authors thank the participants for their engagement with and significant contributions to this study. They also thank Cloudtag® for providing Onitor® Track test units, technical support (for the test unit and app) and comments on this paper."
" Actual activity monitored by the Onitor® Track, such as the step count and heart rate, was not available for analysis. "
Can you provide any evidence? Nope thought not.
a) cloudtag licensed a museic chipset. Those don't support a screen. They support leds. Blinky is a good name for your onitor.
b) The onitor didn't measure the heart rate when worn on the wrist. It was just a step counter in that mode. Notice in all the videos the heart strap connector is attached whenever any measurements taken.
c) Those watches exist, the onitor really doesn't. Is the app finished yet? Despite numerous manufacturing runs there has never been a independent third party hands on review of an onitor.
"Nobody's lost anything yet hex"
That is plainly wrong, any time a stock is diluted at a price lower than your average you have lost value. Which has happened, has it not?
Also do you really believe your prospects are stronger today than 3 years ago? You do realize cloudtag have pretty much only amit left, and even he is taking on other jobs.
You sound like a glass with one molecule full kinda guy
@39MA Man you are just dumb.
"How do you decide what to filter out? Seriously? "
Depends on what model you are using. You have a wider range of potential models when you have more data. You claim the mythical onitors limited dataset is somehow superior, then just use the same model and filter the data down to that subset. You don't have the exclusive rights to a scientific model. Now you have a 24hr device that also has a bunch more data to do other things as well as matching the mythical onitor.
"Does it just add a horrific amount of opportunity to skew results?"
Doesn't having more money provide a horrific opportunity to lose it. Total bias. You always have potential to misuse data, that doesn't mean having more data is a bad thing.
Do you have any evidence what so ever that the onitor successfully calculates the RMR?
Do you have any evidence that the onitor remote health platform works? Or can even capture data?
You irritate me. You don't provide any evidence for the onitor being better that any other device on the market. You just have your own wrong headed speculation combined with the words of Amit. Beautiful.
I can provide evidence that any other device on the market is better. You want to hear it? .....Other devices exist, you can buy them.
@39MA Less data is better because more data would skew results. Total bull****. Even with your own appraoch, it isn't hard to filter a days data into certain bpm ranges for come calcaulations, and at the same time use it for working out how much someone slept, what is their resting hear rate etc. etc. More data doesn't hurt :handface:
You need to show the onitor uses x to calculate energy expenditure and that the onitor it is independently proven to work. I mean independent, published, repeatable testing, not some closed study on a chipset years before the device existed.
You are wasting your breath. Anyone can pick a couple papers and speculate that some mythical device does it this way. Not much use though, you can't sell your shares.
Good luck with your investment.
:handface:
(A) 1.5p, (B) 2.5p (if license + spud, if neither 1.75p)
Well done dougal, you certainly warned us all.
At this point, they must be just trolling. The last pump, was just a effort who was looking to try offload their shares to a bigger fool in one desperate hopeless attempt.
They all know what is up, if they give yet more cash to amit, we can't say they where not warned. It is on them, and has been for a while.
lol
@karamazov Investing cash isn't evidence. Cloudtag already has 9m of that thrown at it.
Is there any evidence of any progress what so ever? All we have seen in the last couple of years are all the staff leaving saying it was doomed. We have have numerous dubious statements that have not held up. Cloudtag fails to meet its own timelines time and time again.
The dimwits are the ones without cloudtag shares?
Maybe 0? If he had invested 1.5m given cloudtags previous wouldn't he be shouting it from the rooftops.
"The Board continues to support the Company and we hope that this update gives confidence that our original main shareholders are still in place, have invested further and are looking forward to a positive conclusion for the Company."
ROFL
I am sure he does, shame the shares are in cloudtag. Maybe he can sell some to you?