RE: Serious for a second23 Nov 2023 12:26
JD-Nau
'That is not true is it Heid? The company have been very clear in the RNS that the requisition was dated the 15th but was only received by courier on the 21st after 5pm and by email yesterday on the 22nd. They released the RNS yesterday. Why are you claiming differently and where is your evidence?'
Do you know what, I only just read that detail in the Reabold RNS after posting that to you JD-Nau about the dates an the requisition only just being RNSd
I am lost why they put that in the RNS as yes, my understanding is the RNS was sent around the 15th November.
Kamran had to send Stephen an Sachin a legalish warning yesterday to say
' Court has affirmed that:
whether a resolution is vexatious must be considered from the view of the company, not the directors; and the right of shareholders to remove directors and appoint new ones is a fundamental right of members which cannot be considered to be troublesome, burdensome or vexatious.
As a shareholder I have significant concerns to why you are delaying calling the meeting.'
So when the RNS popped up I thought ...at last !