RE: RE: Sub 1p7 Sep 2022 17:04
Ezhik,
I admit that I was relying on my memory, but I have just confirmed it with some research.
I have just checked the share price tables in today's edition of the "Financial Times", and for each share they just give one current share price, which is the MID price. (They do not include the bid/offer spread.)
And who can argue with 'The Pink 'Un' on such a matter?!
I have also just checked the latest edition of the "Investors Chronicle", and similarly, they use the MID share price as the headline share price at the start of their ' recommendation' articles on individual companies.
At the end of these articles, they go into more detail, but even here the main share price used is the mid prices, with the buy/offer price then shown as the 'touch' spread.
Similarly, share price charts are generally based on one share price at each moment in time shown on the chart, and the basis is the mid price, not the bid &/or offer price.
With respect to the IG piece quoted, it's really just a piece of badly-worded, ill-thought-out, fluff.
What it's really referring to it a "trade price": which will vary according to whether the market maker is buying or selling, and the size of the trade.
"A" share price can be subtly different from "THE" share price.
Publishers, chartists, etc., want ONE main share price to reference to, and there's no question that the standard approach is to use the MID price.
The bid price may sometimes (though not always) be used for valuing a portfolio.
Though if you're planning to hold a share for the very long term, the question of you selling it on the market is less relevant, so a mid price valuation is more appropriate.