AGM and ownership structure5 Sep 2025 13:01
My take: reading the entire RNS, it says that Foreign Dimension already owned over 50% of GSCU’s capital from the moment the company went public in 2021. FD’s ownership went below 50% in 2023 because more shares were issued. FD currently holds 25M warrants, which if excercised would provide funding for GSCU Viuda and Mostaza Phase 3+ drilling (current Phase 3 is already funded) BUT would take FD ownership stake back above 50%. The listings rules make this warrant excercise impossible without FD launching an offer to the entire company.
My thoughts: FD clearly do not want to takeover GSCU (they likely want other investors on board) and do want to provide more funding to GSCU for 2026 drilling - but can’t actually do it under current listing rules, hence the AGM & rule waiver resolution.
What i’m doing: I’m sure voting for the resolution and topping up my position on any further weakness. GSCU look to have two meaningful discoveries underway and as the drilling results start coming in Q4 and then 2026, the value of the company will inevitably skyrocket on good grades (and company know much better where the resource sweet spots might be, with current resource models informed by all the 2025 drilling).
What annoys me (to be transparent): 1. Delay to Mostaza phase 3 start - first it was end August, then end this week, now still nothing. Just don’s set expectations if you’re not 100% sure you can deliver.
2. I suspect FD is actually selling to reduce their position, as they know will be excercising warrants anyway, hence the higher volumes recently and share price drop. Counterproductive in my view & short-term frustrating, but long term allows me to build bigger position than I otherwise could. So short term pain long term gain mode for now.
Thoughts?