RE: RE: new share issuance19 Oct 2021 14:05
You’re very welcome clown shoes. I guess your opinion is the only one that counts.
Let’s do a little list shall we, of all the reasons why this idea is thicker than a whale omelet:
Material degradation of the turbine structure. These machines will be continuously exposed to an immersive environment full of salts and little sea creatures that like sticking to and chewing on metals.
Bio fouling of gearing (and let’s not even start on about the whole electrifying the energy capture array! How much would that cost??!)
Maintenance and mooring/anchoring complications.
Environmental damage through oil leakage (remember these things need to be lubricated most likely with a graphite/silicone Grease compound.
The costs of anchoring and then linking each turbine to the underground network (astronomical costs).
Like I mentioned, this isn’t North Sea oil, which at the time of the initial investment was well worth the squeeze. Oh and by the way, American engineers and scientists at the time said that it was easier and cheaper to put people on the moon than drill the North Sea. Now we’re all meant to believe that tidal flow is the way forward. I think you’ll find mr nofookinclue you’ve bought into a pipe dream of epic proportions. You’d be better off sticking your money in the Springfield monorail.