Member Info for gordon1237

Blimey Harry, you make that board sound like a scary Stephen King movie. Lol.

Callum, really admire your optimistic slant on things. If it's done quickly, obviously good. If it's done slowly still good. Lol.
Might not be talking to gspc that's taking this time. Wouldn't think it would take too long to agree on a hopefully reduced price. Might be persuading the money men that's a bit trickier.

Thanks VF. I now need "only" about an 88 % rise which is a bit better than the 400% at one point. About the same for Conger, I think. Still think nothing is certain until we see that rns with what we all hope is a great deal.
Axel. Now that would be perverse, hating to make money. Mind you, can't be sure as I've yet to experience that with Oilex. Lol. Atb.

Until very recently was pretty sure I had thrown good money after bad here, by massively increasing my holding here at the back end of 2019. Before recent developments I gave myself maybe a 10% chance of getting back to my average of 0.32. Now I view it as 50/50. Gla.

Fair enough Steven. You are right this isn't the place for political discussion. Had enough of that on the Lloyds board. Atb.

Steven, thank you and your colleagues so much for all your efforts with the vaccination and other great work. Nice of the government to reward you with a poxy 1% rise. Atb.

More like invidual genes would determine reaction to the vaccine Steven.
I am 72 machoman. Retired 4 years ago. Not too sure about age bringing wisdom though. Lol.

We had our Astrazeneca jabs on Feb 1st. No effects whatsoever. Atb.

60 days later

Apologies and slight correction to what I said earlier Vf. The shares were issued on 15th October. See rns of that date. You are correct at that time they were 3.2 cents. The cut off point for issuing more if they were below 3.7 cents was 60 days, about 15th December. It was at that time they were 6 cents so we just got the 24.5 million less 10% making 22.05 million.
Atb.

Depends on your starting point VF. In September they had been as low as 2 cents. They were actually issued in mid December when they were about 6 cents. Part of the agreement was if they were below 3.7 cents at that time Oilex would get more shares. That obviously didn't come into play.
Pretty small beer compared to the big picture. Provides useful capital while we wait. Atb.

Complained to lse about posts disappearing and received the following reply.
"Hi Gordon,
We're aware this is a glitch on the website and it's on the list to be fixed. Although it's not ideal, logging out should show all posts.
Kind regards
Craig
London South East

Anyway, more importantly, it's great to see the Covid numbers falling off a cliff. The seven day rolling average of deaths is now 255, that's down 80% from the peak of 1248 on 23rd January. Gla.

In 3 months Armour went from 6.3 all the way down to 3.3 and now back up to 4.5 cents. Oilex sold at 5 cents.
Well that's now 3 trading weeks gone by with no news. Gla.

Just worked out why there is a discrepancy. The original amount was 24.5 million, but they gave 10% to another company for services rendered. See rns of 15th June.
Deduct 10% from 24.5 and you get 22.05.
Dont like mysteries. Lol.

15th October

Qs. The final number of shares was 22.05 million. See rns 25th October. Atb.

Well, it's already happened. Has been over 0.2, two or three times. Obviously the longer it goes on it becomes concerning. Atb.

We were hoping you were going to tell us. Lol. Nobody had a scooby. Gla.

They received 22 million shares of which they have sold 5 million.