Member Info for Gobbygnome

Why is it I can say anything for analysis. But as soon as I mention any media, a very negative post follows?

Re the 'moving on'ppst

You all seem to struggle with your own concept

Re excel

I hsve written a few versions of my oen for maekets

You will get sites like stockipedia calling it a suckered stock etc

My own forumlas kick back the terminology as 'fraud'

But thats just my own descriptor. I can choose any terminology I want for it

3 red flags cam up beside the terminology 4 days ago

It is strange though isn't it? You look at excel sheets or whatever and its second nature re don't even need to think

Then when you decide to post it, you suddenly realise all the info that's subconsciously imprinted by data and charts

Speed lol

Actually, probably healthier than any product mentioned on the threads :)

Of course, people are a bit more aware these days. It's all guilds and social media groups now to control narrative and directions

But all I say to you is, ...

Market doesn't lie to you daily......SP

And as such you get 2 common types on forums

1. Unwitting foot soldiers. Trapped and blagging harder than the media that trapped it

2. Media directing the foot soldiers

😂

As I said before, in the 1st event, retail are caught at an average of most likely 50-55. Let's say 44 for ridiculous conservatism

Why do they operate a new lower range for next phase? It's nkt just because same underlying profit.

Retail are stuck high up. And they will feel forced to support any future dilutions via open market (csn dump on them again and again )

Cant be letting that gravy train escape

No sir

All they are doing is template to event one

But this time, the boys will make the same money in the 1-10p range

The salary wont change

Bond percentages won't change

Fund percentages won't change

Fees won't change

Maker spread profits won't change

Same game, same money...New price range

I recommend the reading of other company RNSs from the past. With the same thing left to be done, most were actually 4-5 years from positive earnings

SBTX?

Let's see

Sederma magically cut years off the standard study timeframe for said. .

What's left will seemingly be complete at the same reckrd rate of knots, comared to others

All that to get a 'notional pilot launch' ready for an event day 😂

There will be only earnings losses from any croda talk. Same at opti manu/dist deals. Same here

And if ypu read the RNS and the structure thst is supposedly yet to be completed, even a reql business woild be 3 years away from any hope of earnings in the green.

But opti and sbtx have a knack of making sure the cash extraction team expenses are always more snyway

I think somebody said a lot of the selling a couple of days prior to news , was centred around a 9p exit ?

So that's first destination

But of course, that was best value for them . So 9p is only a pit stop

Yes massive cash call to come. I think one well before next summer as well

The selling now is only the prep for a future 2/3 to 11p

Yiu see, when the prep is done fir future selling, maker walks up price on smany rubbish RNS. False market creation

This RNS was the inverse. To sell into next cash call at much lower price

Re the blag is all profit without sales

RNS business

Pilot Launch..Soft Launch..Logistical issues etc

It's just terminology that means zero costs to RNS announcements of product

Didn't see that. Well spotted.

Everythung I have said here, I have backed up with charts , dataflows, loan markets ..everything, elsewhere .

At 600% up I shall reveal it all. And you will say ...

'OMG'

I dont think so. They would have to arrest the little cap uk market whole on that premise

Hard2handle

Don't become a fixated fan. I can assure you, its unhealthy

'I have diplomatic immunity from gerbilism'

-Saving grace...if smart enough...

Staggering dumping. That, believe that or not , is your saying grace, is smart enough to do as the money does

Once they have completed the sell rota , as said before, maker has to go straight to real world pricing

🪂