Member Info for gdog

The market may take kindly to a Biden win in the short term. It's expected if he wins, there will be so much government spending (a euphemism for a total waste of Money) that we'll get a short term "sugar high".

Long term "he" will destroy the USA. Although "he" does not have a clue; it's not really him. It's the far left who'll take over if Biden wins.

Eagle,

I, for one, am not buying what the polls are selling. I am far from alone.

Do not believe what you read in the press. Do not underestimate the strength and enthusiasm of Trump's followers.

Time will tell if the USA returns to being the USA, or if we go globalist / socialist.

I do know the difference between "or" and "are", which isn't apparent in my below post.

I have a horrible habit of proofing after I click "send", or "reply", whatever. Some people never learn.

JR,

I disagree about the PIs moving the stock. With such a small amount of the float not in the hands of institutions, the PIs would put more pressure on the up or downside if they were to buy are sell. The fact that there is not much supply causes there to be a greater effect on the price due to demand or lack of demand.

Hey jr,

Fingers crossed you quadruple your Money.

Note: I always capitalize the "M" in Money to show proper respect to the deity. Same with Cash, Dough, etc.

As far as trading difficulties, I imagine the institutional investors would not put up with the rubbish with which the PIs are forced to put up. Then again, I've not a clue. Still, I find it hard to believe. It's a train wreck of a system for me.

Here's what I found about holders. I've no idea how accurate this is, but I still cannot imagine why this issue trades as low as it trades based on our fundamentals and prospects. Seems to me, if the below numbers are close to accurate, there're not a lot of PIs in with us.

Major HoldersCurrency in GBp
Breakdown
25.33% % of Shares Held by All Insider
63.97% % of Shares Held by Institutions
85.67% % of Float Held by Institutions
41 Number of Institutions Holding Shares

Curly, et al.,

OK, now I see why he's despised.

Dude is an annoying little twit.

Thanks, Curly,

Good luck to you as well. Good luck to all longs.

Hey jr,

I wrote my 18:23hr post without having seen your 18:13hr post. I own enough, relative to my overall portfolio, to the point it keeps me very interested. It's all relative. A dollar to me is a penny to many.

Hey Eddie,

So far I am very happy I chose to back up the truck and load up on TRMR. Or, as you guys prefer, "I filled up my boots."

I started to buy more at 170 pence. I was stupid and took a bit too much at that level, or so it seemed at the time because, of course, it dropped like a rock after that...but I kept on buying, a bit at a time, now my average price is around 157.3 pence.

Better lucky than smart.

Even luckier was the fact that the pound has moved in my favor since I finished buying. I effing love it.

Hey jr,

Thanks.

Seems to me the AIM is quite the predator, especially from where I sit. I've never had the troubles I have now buying on the AIM. It is incredible how effed up it is for me in the States. I used to have accounts at Bank Vontobel, where we could trade the AIM easily. Due to all the problematic U.S.- foreign bank account reporting rules, I moved my main "off shore" account back to the States, only keeping two in Spain.

Still, I follow how the stock trades each and every day, and it is remarkable how illiquid it is, even for you guys.

But the fact is, I came into this realizing where we trade. To be honest, I feel we may become big to the point where we'll have to move to a decent exchange, one that is more liquid, with smaller spreads and true price discovery.

As I've mentioned a few times, I can only buy or sell during these strange auctions held several times during the day. The auctions show up as the "Uncrossed Trades" (UT) we see to the far right of the "TRMR Share Trades" page. I wanna play, so I gotta pay.

Hey Crusty,

There is more than hope. This is darn good progress, and I feel we've a winner on our hands.

Of course it doesn't matter one bit what I feel, but I would not have gotten back into the blinkx mess without huge changes. This is a different company, and I am betting we'll do very well over the next year to the next few years.

Not to mention, relative to companies in our sector whose stocks trade on the NASDAQ, we're significantly undervalued. Management knows this; they talked about it during the CC on 24 September. I wish they'd do something about it. The AIM is a total cluster-fvkk. It is a disaster of an exchange.

Eagle...

American chums? American cousins? In my case it's both.

Stevie Wonder,

As we say in the states, it's better to be lucky than smart.

BTW: All my pals in Spain call me "Stevie Wonder".

Note: Since the fairly recent past, since I noticed what was going on with TAP, I started to get back in after being in blinkx since it was Autonomy (talk about a crook in Mike Lynch, I was totally lucky on that one). Since then I've stated my belief, on several occasions, this is not the old POS known as blinkx, or R-1, this is a different company. Time will tell if I got lucky on this call.

Gotta go with stt1 on his below post.

By the way, stt1, over the last few years I'd check in here from time to time and peruse a few posts. I read several of yours, to many of which I agreed. You were not at all popular for telling it as you did, but what I read of yours was to me, telling it as I saw it for the most part.

Your below post is spot on.

Eagle,

I trust you recall what Taptica found regarding R1s revenue numbers shortly after the deal closed. To help wipe some of the egg off their face they (TAP) mentioned they paid a price that took into account bad numbers, but I am pretty sure they didn't realize what a nose dive R1 was taking.

I realize that's on Taptica management for not doing thorough due diligence. Still...R1 was a piece of sheeeet; I am very happy we were taken out, and the new team seems to be heading us in the right direction, which is why I upped what was left of my blinkx holdings by over 8X during the past several months.

Milhous,

R1 was a POS. As in total.

I believe we got really lucky by having Taptica buy us.

Bow wow...I should have looked a bit deeper.

Frankly I was surprised by what I read then posted...so yeah, I should have dug deeper.

Then again, look at item four below of Eagle's post. It doesn't appear too daunting (It seems to me we qualify):
:

Standard No. 4: Assets With Equity
Companies can eliminate the cash flow and revenue requirements, and decrease its marketing capitalization requirements to $160 million if their total assets total at least $80 million and their stockholders' equity is at least $55 million.

Eagle,

There are numerous companies on the NASDAQ that lose Money. There are a lot more regulatory issues that need to be addressed which cause some to not want to list there, like quarterly reports, etc.

As cut from "Investment Bank" website:

What are the rules to be listed on NASDAQ? To be listed on the NASDAQ exchange and reporting system, the following requirements:

Shareholders Equity of at least $2,000,000
At least 100,000 shares of public float
A minimum of 300+ shareholders
Total assets of $4,000,000
At least two market makers
$3 minimum bid price of the company stock
Public float market value of $1,000,000

Crusty,

This is a different company. I never would have invested more than what I had left of my blinkx holdings if it weren't.

Not that it matters to anyone but me what I think, I agree with JR. OK, in this case JR may care.

This stock is cheap by US standards. Really cheap.

As mentioned several times, if this stock were off the POS AIM, I strongly believe we'd see a lot better price discovery, lower spreads, and higher public exposure with much greater trading volume. It is incredibly difficult for me to buy or sell from the States. Absurdly so. I guess our investment dollars don't matter much when it comes to the tech market.