RE: Don't fall for it23 Jun 2025 09:23
46G, my take on it is he never wanted it in the first place. The role of CEO was thrust upon him, and he accepted the responsibility because the company was not in a position to attract the right CEO. Now is the time, and he is probably relieved to no longer have that responsibility. He's getting back to what he's particularly suited to, overseeing the technical aspects of the company. To label that as a demotion is crass. With regard to us needing to placate an institutional investor, I believe that is tosh. PI's own this company, and I believe that although we've had some slippages in programme, most have been and continue to be highly supportive of JM, and appreciate how he has steered us through very perilous conditions. Last words from me on this subject, your 'believability' poll was ridiculous, and if you are the genuine shareholder you claim to be, I don't understand why you would attempt to create negative sentiment on this BB. I was always taught you don't air your dirty laundry in public