Member Info for fulmar29

I agree 600,when this does "pop" ( through JV, NSR Asset sale or large grades news) it will be far too late for anyone to get a single figure price.

@600 No offense taken,as I said I was just about to add the negs as I saw it.I don't think the MMs will let this go on the volume we see at the moment,but we should see a gradual rise as the drills come in(about 40 as Westie said) over the next12/14 wks.If in the meantime Zam announce a clear miner friendly policy to expand rather than contract production,we will gain further momentum GLA

Not trying to spin anything-I was just about to point out the only neg,I saw was that money will run out early next year and if we don't process ore or sell an asset we will have to raise money.I don't think pis would get a look in to any placing but it would be at a price equal of above last FO placing. When investing in explorers that's what happens and you pick you entry point and wait.I think Nick (given his background) will have some inventive finance options to protect his own holding. GLA

Well he couldn't have been much clearer-The majors are waiting for JORC/MRE or PEA before they will make their move.
MRE was planned for Cheyeza by end of this year and plenty of drilling in the meantime. it's also" looking like" some areas merge into one (which would dwarf FQ/Sentinel). With at least 30kt Cu ($180m gross) from just 250mx250m (chey) for poss SSP to generate cash with ,and then"Quite advanced discussions"on a gold asset. 7.5km drilling before year end lots of news in the next few months.

Geng,I agree there is a gap and from where I am observing it won't be getting filled any time soon.It's between your ears.Every share has a gap--so bloody what ! News will just means a gap occurs at a different level destroying the previous one.

All majors will be keeping their powder dry until the Zam govt sorts out their confused tax scenarios i.e VAT/Sales and proposed mining taxes.But until then we are proving up potential monsters -in-waiting.With a very,very conservative estimate If the four sites we are now active on only proved up an average of 1kmx200m@1% and 25mdepth (from surface) the sale price would dwarf current mcap.Don't take my word for it-ask the drillers But it aint gonna happen in 5 mins and we will require at least one PFS/MRE for majors to make their move(s) IMO GLA

if you email NvS he will include the answer in his chat or answer you individually

and now MI showing sub $17

More drills than a dentist's surgery,but with the dentist paying !!!!!!!!!

the date on that is 16/9 written the american (wrong)way round-so not really sure where the discrepancy is.Any thoughts?

17,820.00 USD 5.00 (0.03%) Official Close 9/16/2019 MI Hardly 17 is it although that wouldn't be a problem

https://twitter.com/optivalondon/status/1173622818115862534/photo/1

have/are they replacing SP Angel ? "Our corporate client" ?????

Not guaranteed Peggy but look at the previous dates and Nick likes some news before CCs-he has form.

In recent years The Fool has been a better guide to do the opposite of what they say.

Or "I wouldn't touch this with a long barge pole" or "I shamed NvS on twitter into doing it"etc.etc.etc. @Blood filter the parasite-he is just not right in the head .

News re the US listing will surely be discussed at the European shareholder meetings,and possibly news re legal action against MW and friends.All will positively affect the sp

@Peggy-I also don't tell porkies and when I am accused of deliberately misleading anyone it does get my attention.@Blood-I don't think your use of plural for "deceivers" is accurate I think there is only one deliberate deceiver (parasite) on here who really thinks he is brighter than everyone else and through his words can affect the sp .All others are entitled to opinions ,but I get frustrated when people make statements (negative or positive) that would be easily discounted with the most basic of research.

So you "bought in today @3.17 after saying "I don't disagree but paying suppliers in shares I don't see as necessarily a positive. It usually indicates a cash crunch and no matter which way you spin it, that's never good." Genius pure Genius !

Or some thick twat who tries and make a case after opening their ignorant ill informed and opinionated gobs ("cash crunch") without doing any basic research whatsoever,then try and justify their ignorance by doing a bit of research after their error . Your figures are incorrect surprise ,surprise Read the RNS and then look at the sp for the agreed date.If you don't think that is a significant premium that's your problem .If you read a bit more you will see that the deal was concluded in London with an even lower sp, and If you fancy repeating any of your dumb insults to my face please,please make contact on twitter.Or just another gobby git ?