Member Info for fulmar29

Cheers Luke. Building the port for soy beans-yeah right !

and then maybe the company will be "Bjorn " again ? or maybe just a very rich NIMBY.

https://www.mining.com/copper-price-rally-builds-on-all-time-high-china-imports/

Scenarios change,but "leopards do not change their Lifestyle spots".If this came good then brilliant,but otherwise it was a good (pricey) lesson in researching CEOs thoroughly. GLA

Max-for him to do it gradually will raise the SP a lot higher (if that is what he wants).If he buys 30% he can make a bid or just sit on his shares to stop anyone else doing it.Time will tell,all we do know is the Prof will still get his "lifetime " salary.

Sceptical LTH here.Why would this billionaire not just buy the company at such a low Mcap ?

https://www.mining.com/horizonte-releases-pfs-on-vermelho/

https://www.mining.com/4-charts-that-say-this-time-the-copper-price-surge-could-last/

The Ch East drills have, I believe changed things a" bit" because Nick will need to get a MRE out to satisfy the potential suitors/financers criteria.With the drills showing wider and lengthier mineralization and changing host ground he said we will have to re evaluate the Ch E drilling.-A nice problem to have.

What's even more important NvS is not here for a 3 bagger either.And people with a lot more inside knowledge than us i.e. Drillers and Debtor(s) are very confident as well. Some PIs have sussed this share out,but the general market hasn't a clue and most funds will need $100m Mcap or a MRE to even start their process of buying in.Potential future partners/funders may start building soon but it takes a while for them to get organized. Meanwhile drilling news pending from Ch E/ WLun/Muswema/Lumbetta Production figures from Kalaba.And probably more We have had 9 (proper news) RNSs since the 1st Nov pivotal RNS when we appointed Remy as FO . " I love it when a plan comes together" J."Hannibal" Smith :-))

@SXX if a "historical creditor"were to write off a debt,it would be a tax loss,so it may benefit them to take profits on our shares in the future.They are not named for a reason,probably at their request,I only know of one historical creditor and if it was them,then it would be an industry first (i believe) for them to accept warrants .10x debt is far too much ,possibly 2 or 3x.But the point for us is that it preserves cash and allows us to be strong and in control of negotiations.IMO

historical creditor takes shares @4.5p, more shares,not great,price good,more ducks iin a row and clearing the decks again,for what ?????

Sentinel (next door) would give their right arm for these grades, and in an effort to find Ch East extremities we have widened and lengthened the original estimate (which was large already and I assumed would contract) we have found something even larger than they were expecting.Definite pint tonight !

Nick does not use words lightly so the RNS title "Major Exploration development" (possible pun?) says volumes.Then sulphide drills to the NW (good grades) and the deposit extending further SE(v.good grades)than had been expected,and with his recent (unusual) 0/10/20 bagger comments , andAGM on 16th with further news before then.GLA "sticky holders"

anyone notice we've hit SULPHIDES !! and now onto seeing if (as Nick alluded to before) some of these deposits link up.

If that pony was going to auction and you had already been offered sums from several potential buyers,who you also knew would be at the auction,then it would probably be worth the gamble. Only my opinion and not "straight from the horses mouth". :-)

https://www.mining.com/web/copper-primed-for-a-pop-if-us-china-trade-war-is-resolved/

Looking at the exploration map it is just inside the Zaco area,but right on the border of Ivanhoe licenses-Mmmmmmm

Zaco is not geographical as in compass based but individual license areas accross the Zamsort area

Mushinge's silly low price for 5% represents the fact that the deal is strategic andhe is partly paying himself and will gain from any subsequent Arc news. The transaction will probably be more to do with a potential partner /purchaser insisting on the controlling interest in all licenses, ( the drills we are waiting on that "were" Zaco controlled).Or at the very least Nicks "perception" of their requirements As I said before Nick likes to be in control,and what is the point of releasing great drills and not owning a controlling interest in the site(s)
.https://www.miningweekly.com/article/friedland-regains-control-over-ivanhoe-shares-pledged-as-security-2019-12-03--Owner of Kamoa-Kakula,Friedland (mentioned in the Crux interview) has also taken steps to gain further control of Ivanhoe-?????