Member Info for Foxhill

You haven’t answered my question.

And it won’t matter how many times I, or anybody else, reads that RNS, we wont be able to get to your crystal clear observation.

You haven’t answered my q

Of round sells today

Let’s say a new MSC (airport) is worth 7m+ @ 50% gross.

Then calculate gross sales of kit required to generate 3.5m gross @ say 20% margin.

Then tell me what crystal you’re peering into.

My issue is more with your interpretation;

“It is crystal clear and suggests that virus equipment sales is equivalent to a whole new MSC overnight!”

Is just bo((ock$

Chloroquin - an outdated anti malaria drug is also mooted as an option.

I have been wondering what has been happening with very young patients - are they as vulnerable as the elderly?

Did your research throw up any stats on that? Curious.

Thanks in anticipation

Not remotely angry.

But it doesn’t get close to the crystal clear inference that Feeks sees.

There is mention of impact - in the negative.

There is no suggestion that the revenue and margin lost - will be replaced by kit sales - let alone amount to the equivalent of a new MSC - Feeks assertion.

I asked for tangible evidence that;

“It is crystal clear and suggests that virus equipment sales is equivalent to a whole new MSC overnight!”

There is NO such suggestion. Let alone crystal clear.

Not that there was an RNS.

Try again.

Draft hasn’t popped in to clap loudly.

No offence taken.

“It is crystal clear and suggests that virus equipment sales is equivalent to a whole new MSC overnight!”

Give me something tangible to substantiate that.

"....we expect our increase in product sales due to the COVID-19 crisis to offset any potential reduction in revenues from our aviation security business."

Only talks about revenue....

;-)

To see a bit of a lift.

If sticking your fingers in your ears works. Great.

But if you replace revenue that has a gross profit of 50% - with the same level of revenue with a 10% mark up - you are significantly worse off. No?

What vacuum? You’re getting updates every other day?

This has been down to 5 & 6p before. The BoD on that occasion stayed schtum. So is it inconsistency or something else?

I might be being disingenuous, but maintain that historically, WSG only get chatty when it ‘suits’.

Two CV updates in as many days from the company that doesn’t do blow by blow info.

I’m not happy down here but three RNS’s in quick succession puts my spidey cynical senses into overdrive.

This (to me) smells of board anxiety about the SP. There’s only one reason for that. They are getting nothing out of the last funding facility with the SP down here - and I suspect that was required, as detailed by others.

I don’t understand why there’d be any delay or need to “finalise” twixt Scanport and WSG. If any contract should have been a formality, it’s that one.