The next focusIR Investor Webinar takes places on 14th May with guest speakers from Blue Whale Growth Fund, Taseko Mines, Kavango Resources and CQS Natural Resources fund. Please register here.
Jjp
Nobody has ever disputed we are looking for a deal
The fact that Dr dilly was still having to go to a trade show and be on a deal making companies stand suggests that at that point we still didn't have one that we viewed as acceptable
Could she have been having "advanced conversations" with passing people ? ....yes she could ...is there anything released yet to suggest a deal is imminent ....nope ...
The problem is ....the RNS's released are never specific enough on some issues to give a cast iron belief
I am sure we can think of examples in the past were we have read something ....assumed one thing ...only for that not to happen ...go back ...re-read it and realise how wishy washy the original statement was
And that's the issue here ...nothing is clear
Jjp
Current partners can mean anything
Valirx partners with a whole host of businesses in order to prepare things for trials , research etc
The one thing I have learnt from the past is unless it says it exactly ...then assume it isnt happening
i think we all agree on a couple of things :
the business needs cash to function
We only want to see the past poor finance decisions made if there are NO other options available
The thing to discuss as holders is - how do we ensure the second point happens
to tozerks point - i dont think now is the time to discuss salaries etc - that is something for 3/6/9 months down the line if cash is supplied and we see no progress - your point is fair - and it is correct - but if as shareholders we are to exert some influence it has to be a gradual thing
can both camps at least agree on these points?
hi harley
we are pretty much on the same page but for one thing
its the headroom that concerns me - consistently this BOD have taken finance at massive discounts without first seeking the opinion of their shareholders or - more importantly - asking if shareholders wanted to participate
if shareholders dont - then fine - we have no choice - but to not even ask or consider ?????
thats why the headroom concerns me - its free reign if you like to carry on regardless
hi harley
well i look at the 30th november cash raise - at 1p
within 12 days we had released our update and the price had risen to 6p - we knew this update was due - we pretty much as a company knew what it was going to say
yet we raised at 1p 12 days before ????
would it not have been prudent to wait 12 days ?
we then threw more news in some 6 days later - again news we knew was due
i dont think you have to be a financial guru to realise that at that point - raising at 1p was a big mistake - and resulted in unnecessary dilution for holders - which then contributed to a depression of the share price and thus further shareholder pain
thoughts?
hi harley
sorry about the double post - i should really have used the previous message for further questions
you talk of "being so close to the finish line"
i think that's the point - there is no finish line in sight - indeed - nobody seems to be able to put their finger on exactly when we will gloriously cross this line with our arms aloft
maybe you have a opinion on when we are likely to get over this finish line ?
If indeed we are so close - do you think holders should have information as regards being included in discounted capital raises?
or do you think the BOD should just have the easy option of a massive discount bucket shop placing?
interested in your thoughts
hi nomlungu
nah ---i doubt they will report this one
he/she/they - are removing any posts that dont fit their narrative
and curiously - any posts were you ask them a question and they either cant answer it - or answer it and look a bit daft when they get it wrong
hope this narrows down the search for who is responsible
we state our opinion as LTH's about the companies direction and its past financing decisions
and we get :
called trolls
told to sell our shares and go away
told lies about the company going into liquidation
accused of being de-rampers
accused of being paid posters
accused of looking to endanger the company
have our legitimate concerns in our posts ridiculed
have our posts reported and removed
I hope anyone who was unsure of what to do in this has seen all this
hi russel
your view is unacceptable to people who wish to preserve the status quo
they have been reporting for removal every post that questions the direction of this BOD - they usually wait a little while and do a blanket report
its a concern that a group has decided in take an approach of censorship to shareholders views
and they day we are paid employees !!!!!! :oD