The latest Investing Matters Podcast episode featuring financial educator and author Jared Dillian has been released. Listen here.
T-A-fireblanks@ let the yard stick of my understanding be if im taken to court or not. Sound fair to me.
black law from the 4th edition on started to change defections so to keep us on the same page is why i said what i did, pretty simple concept in law to understand , one think im not is religious when you know what i do. if i should read more you should actually start.
@canchat this has been about the company and its community (blackmail imo) fund, it relates to the letter they sent out threatening no planning no fund. and its absence from the mins.
P-S you post on the 25th aug would suggest you found it then(filter) so why the all of a sudden i found it post today?
i should add 4th edition or lower its been changed over time,
LOL, you really are a special kind of stupid". im happy to be called an idiot in court, you clearly don't know the meaning.
“man acting as judge, the libellous & defamatory comments, claimed are imo, that’s “in my opinion” you know”. and the writen stated documents from the company itself.
Flat, that’s the whole point of the law. To protect people from false allegations by people like you, you is pural which one of me are you talking about? either way, to have an opinion on documents they produced themselves is not something law can cover it dose not work like that.
If ignorance was an acceptable legal defence, you’d be acquitted every time. Unfortunately for you, it’s not.
the ignorance of law applies to a whole other field, i know you look at it simply as anything beyond is beyond you but for now and your level id just say again im happy to be an idiot in court..maybe look it up in blacks law
maybe you need to read my messages again i quite clearly say imo which you must be stupid enough not to know it means
in my opinion, thats all i have said is just my opinion, cant be took to court for that, and if they do they use a foreign language so im not to worried if they do.
@ugly if the convo looks to be above pre-school level you really shouldn't engage even if it is on a bb.
now no running in the class room
ugly@ well he did try to imply i didnt know what blackmail was, yet it seem's he was the one not to know, and as this is nothing to do with you(unless that is your other account) then id say mind your own.
@2bfair imo it is blackmail as it is dependant on planning its not a fund that goes ahead if planning not granted therefor imo it is blackmail, grant planning and get fund or no planning no fund its pretty much the defection of blackmail. others may soften it to bride or sweetner but if the end result is as above then imo its still blackmail. be interested how you see the incentive?? how dose the incentive work with out planning?? ill await your uneducated response
we all know about the community (blackmail imo) fund, begin dependant of agreement to planning, only difference is its not in the mins but was in the letter. its their stated position
C-B
this here's the rubber duck...do you copy me 10-4
b for me with cavate,
lol you claiming to be part of mensa?? with the stuff you come out with here.. ok rightio... and don't link me to that Jesuit
that is the thing with not knowing the future just have to make a calculated guess on the info to hand and past performance, it may get exciting but its not yet
anywhere you like? you are not smart enough to debate either @nfg
so do you believe they fully funded for the legal challenge to planning at W-N
ive reported my own comment if you want to talk about flat earth or what is or not correct English we can take it else where, keep this to on topic stuff
@nfg
i have only one too its against the rules to have more than one anyway ok @nfg so drop like its hott
pmsl @jimmybob or should i say nfg,
go back and check i only said dilution, which has actually happened so why dont go away and leave us alone,
@ruby i mean heid no im not a newbie,
so im guessing he is the same David 'Roger' Bramhill. then thanks for your answer by not answering and this looks a little over priced,
the only thing i know about him is he gets companies in debt leaves and they go bust..
is that the same guy this mystical David 'Roger' Bramhill.
this looks an interesting share might take a look at this one now
well down from .40 to .23.5 is pretty good the sud .20 was me agreeing with another poster it could have ended up there, but im on a positive week now because says im to like persi@ nothing against the guy/girl, and althou we see things others dont want to see doesn't mean we the same person..
but my actual entry was in the .20s and i was told that would never happen but it did so you should look into the other thing even just to discount it more if you can,
the amount of buys coming in it might be a bounce on the go.. not just find a level