The latest Investing Matters Podcast episode featuring financial educator and author Jared Dillian has been released. Listen here.
one damaged hole after another with no return is the makings of national importance for the green lobby its about how they have messed up.
W-N is going to run in to problems from all angles i would not be hanging my hat on it that is for sure,
have to say his letter is better than the community (blackmail imo )fund letter from rathlin, its clear now planning is going to hold this up for a long time.esp if its proven hard to get out of the ground as it wont be any near national importance.
once pointed out she runs away
weekly pay investment as pointed out yesterday not a trader
the ramp queen wont give you an answer to that none of them will because your right it makes no sense
this is all smoke and mirrors before W-N results come out not expecting them to be good, they only a couple of weeks thats up what are they not telling us just my opinion
anyone else think this out of the blue update is to off set bad news coming over at W-N as it is already priced in
just remind me what interest rbd has in Wressle that would warrant a bounce back here?? they have assets rbd dont have
not sure what took this down but topped up and this will bounce back big time.
all ifs and buts maybes or not at this stage, but one thing i couldnt do is ramp there is nothing to ramp about this one at the min in all honesty victory is 2 years away and alot can happen in that time i think its clear W-N has run into other problems and they running out of money soon, best you can hope for is i move to other holding and try to get better deals there with actual returns likely..this one is a dead duck for at least 2 years if i do go in.
just look at his track record he gets companies in so much debt leaves and they go bust
he has lost it here with everyone not on the payroll
ill highlight again what they should have done
what rathlin should have said and done from the start is what ever the amount they planned on giving commit 10% of that regardless of agreement on planning and offer the 90% should planning be agreed
then it becomes an incentive and not blackmail imo.
@jimmybob, if you the facts pull up the letter from rathlin and see the extorting demand in there where it says no planning no fund. true or false?? see if you have more daggly bits than 2bfair has and will answer that simple question.
blackmail works in more than one way i can withhold something and say do that before i give you this, as in this case with rathlin..or i can demand something using threats how stupid are you think it only works one way?? wow the level has dropped on here
but funny how you see the point in responding today..lol
expect its on rathlins own documents that they started the whole fund talk..and they are with-holding until they extort of the council what they want ie planning. @smellyfish,
@2befair bit rich calling him out when you ran from the whole blackmail situation and cant answer the simple question if the is not agreement on planning will there fund still go ahead??
dont call others out, if your too chicken to be called out yourself how about a little apology from you thank you very much.
more like damaged goods, unproven , years away, if planning complications, lets be realistic about it and looking like a placement coming soon if they follow ujo as money is running out.
@krull it was not sell victory by the end of the year either making it up or got it so wrong its embarrassing..
here is what they said
The Environmental Statement remains on schedule to be submitted to the relevant UK authorities, together with the Victory draft FDP, by the end of 2021.
and was stated in the interviews,
@nfg nicely put bit of honesty there.
a big drop in expectations, yes all the news is still to come but now do you really want it to drop, drip feed effect is never good.
was it not rammed into us that they had the money from jan, so they shouldn't do a placement here should they i mean ruby heid and cloves and all those others where quick to say so after them videos came out of the interviews,
if they do dilute again id say some on here will mighty p*ssed off and maybe start to move for heads.
what rathlin should have said and done from the start is what ever the amount they planned on giving commit 10% of that regardless of agreement on planning and offer the 90% should planning be agreed
@2bfair the imply was just trying to be nice,
your problem with the understanding of blackmail is with the concept of the money value and how pressure is asserted
the money value being extorted is the planning when you say "Rathlin are not demanding payment or another benefit from the council" your wrong the fund will only happen if planning is granted true or false?? answer that one.
your are viewing blackmail from a very limited one side of the coin view blackmail can be applied in many ways, i mean you say it yourself "Rathlin will pay into a community fund I-F they get planning permission the key point why it is blackmail is the fact if they do not do the planning agreement the will be no fund. so it is not an incentive it is a either /or
nice try but i feel deep down you know im right