Roundtable Discussion; The Future of Mineral Sands. Watch the video here.
https://pokemonlp.fandom.com/wiki/Infinity_Energy
Infinity Energy is a type of energy in the Pokémon world derived from the life force of Pokémon. It was developed and harnessed by the Devon Corporation. Its development also involved research into Mega Evolution.
3,000 years prior to the events of Pokémon X and Y, AZ's Floette died in a war. AZ created a machine to revive his Floette, powered by the life force of many Pokémon. His rage was not settled though, so he converted the machine into the ultimate weapon and used it to end the war. This energy is what Professor Sycamore believes is what makes Mega Stones work. Specifically, when the weapon was fired, the power of the beam radiated the energy of XerneasX/YveltalY across the region and infused itself into these stones. Prior to the events of Pokémon Omega Ruby and Alpha Sapphire, Mr. Stone's grandfather, the previous president of the Devon Corporation, learned of the ultimate weapon and wished to use the same energy to help people and Pokémon. This led to Devon developing Infinity Energy. The use of this energy made Devon one of the top industries in Hoenn. Many things have since been powered using the energy, such as Submarine Explorer 1 and the rockets launched from the Mossdeep Space Center. The Devon Parts were also parts to help make the submarine run on Infinity Energy.
In the Delta Episode, a rocket full of Infinity Energy was to be launched to teleport the incoming asteroid to another dimension, prior to Zinnia preventing the launch.
Confidential documents can be found in Sea Mauville stating that Dock investigated the Devon Corporation, finding that they had used Pokémon bioenergy to create Infinity Energy.
I posted the wrong link below. This one is the spanner in the works. Environment Agency objection: https://drillordrop.com/2020/02/26/regulator-objects-to-second-oil-plan-over-failure-to-assess-risk-to-water/amp/?__twitter_impression=true
Ok, so what effect will this have on the opening sp when INFT evetually list on main market?
1) Moratorium
2) 85 % of respondents opposed to gov NSip proposals
3) 97 % of respo debts opposed to gov permitted development proposals
4) Political suicide to call in and overrule local planning authority decisions to refuse planning applications, even for 'non fracking'.
INFT is dead.
won't survive this news.
Cry me a river
Have you got a link to that?
for an update on those 'advanced discussions to acquire a stake in Transgas Limited' ? You guys could do with a catchy Cummings style slogan to liven up this bb :)
Wed, 23rd Oct 2019 15:09
RNS Number : 9132Q
Tau Capital PLC
23 October 2019
23 October 2019
Tau Capital plc
("Tau" or "the Company")
Statement re cancellation of trading on AIM
Further to the Company's announcement of 8 October 2019, Tau confirms that the cancellation of the admission to trading of the Company's ordinary shares on AIM will take effect from 7.00 a.m. on 24 October 2019.
Looks like another one of GW's pipe dreams is about to be delisted on AIM
It's been a bad week for GW:
http://drillordrop.com/2019/10/12/campaigners-accuse-regulator-of-failing-to-assess-fracking-risk-to-nuclear-station/
https://www.thetimes.co.uk/article/cuadrilla-packs-up-in-preston-and-uk-fracking-bites-the-dust-3tdmbmg99?fbclid=IwAR3QPwibUhODZkGM3Cr8ENxRlDYWVQzKN66r1gDMXjlidViVPlu5x8JEpfE
ttps://drillordrop.com/2019/10/12/pm-warned-about-electoral-risk-of-growing-opposition-to-fracking/?fbclid=IwAR0xM8TdLQjX482mjuna-021Hrgl-kGQvHa5bksS0lLjYnlvrTQ5lfmp2j4
GW still waiting for the right political and market conditions. Tory MPs now looking at fracking like its something they've stepped in. Who can blame them after the last week? What do you reckon their chances would be in rhe next GE if they tried to push through their PD and NSIP proposals now? Not looking too rosey at the moment is it?
Interesting post by Phil C on Drill or Drop...
'There seem to be a number of unspoken sub plots about this proposal to frack the south west. Firstly the methodology proposed:
“Mr Williams said the tests were not seismic surveys, which use sound waves to build up pictures of the geology of an area. He said the company had ideas of where it wanted to carry out the tests but when we asked about the locations he said: “I cannot tell you. It is very confidential”. He also said the company was developing technology, which he said, would “do away with the need for exploratory drilling”. He said: “We think this [exploratory drilling] is a waste of time. It just upsets people. We are going straight to production. We are going to revolutionise the industry.”
Asked how this would work, Mr Williams replied:
“I cannot tell you.””
That means applying for an up front production licence, and the conditions for that are far more stringent than the “get out of jail free” rubber stamp job which is the usual excuse for an exploratory licence, but we all know that an exploratory licence is nothing of the sort, it is an intention for production as we have established prior to this.
Then we have to ask, what is this mysterious “developing technology”? Is it the high pressure steam wash we have seen alluded to here? The ill defined and illusive term “proppant squeeze” perhaps?
And the “walk over” that seems to be intended to tell them what is there, something that previous companies have failed miserably at. Dowsing perhaps?
But of course fracking presumably would still be required to fracture the shale, if indeed shale is the target, or is there yet another woo woo wheeze to be revealed yet?
And then we have to ask, what is the engineering status of this “developing technology” And how is this process considered in engineering terms and what additional problems and caveats in operational procedure and knock on pollution and contamination effects does it suggest?
Presumably such a new technique would require the approval of the OGA and the EA, crippled though they are, before anything can be actually allowed to become operational. Would there be trial runs with on site monitoring? Does the USA who seem to be sold on such practices, know about this process and have they tried and abandoned it all ready? And why?
Then we could perhaps become concerned about a small company of doubtful provenance having the expertise and the financial resilience to operate such a “developing technology” in isolation.
I am sure many of you smell a rat, perhaps there is a clue there, a trial run for other interests.
And of course that does not even begin to approach the entrenched and declared opposition to exploitation in Somerset and Kent and that aspect may well choke this effort before it so much as hires a drill bit before it can be put in the ground.
More questions than answers as usual isn’t it? ...'
Haha..PI's done up like kippers. No sympathy.
Or a Big Frac 'n Shake?
GW adopting BAT for Somerset surveys? No, he's got a couple of dorks with backpacks and some dowsing rods walking through a field. You couldn't make this up. Pipe dreams!
How many PEDL does South Western Energy have? How many of these have a 'firm commitment' requiring SWE to commence drilling a well within that PEDL by 20 June 2021? DYOR!
Time is running short, on best case scenario SWE is likely to need to relinquish a number of PEDLs by the deadline. Any reasonable person will conclude that there is no way in a month of blue moon Sundays that a nobody company like SWE/Transgas/UK Methane/ UK Onshore etc etc etc... can meet the 'firm commitment' requirements for most of these PEDLs. Wondering whats causing all the dealys? Probaly due GW trying to put a value on half of nothing!
Hold out for Dorset IMO, cos the Somerset PEDLs are drier than a witches tit..
tock
on the website. Tick tick head on the block.
'To retain the licences beyond the Initial term, the
licensees would need to begin drilling a well by 20 June 2021.'
Anyone care to breakdown what needs to be done between now and getting a drill in the ground?
Is up.
Channel 4 News 13-11-18
https://youtu.be/m8OZ2S0vdpI