RE: Glad29 Nov 2020 17:56
Wizard,
Can you really put your faith in central government support for the Loxley project planning application?
If UKOG do not appeal, it follows that Loxley, and other onshore planning applications for oil and gas projects may be refused by local authorities without any fear of consequences or penalties against councils, based purely on rejection of planning policy technicalities.
If UKOG do appeal, will central government support the local authority planners on the technical aspects of the application? They probably will, but arguably, the higher powers that be will assert the development is not needed. After all, OGA has unilaterally ‘paused’ offshore licensing, has no plans for any future onshore licensing and has kicked off a ‘net zero by 2050’ energy policy. Public opinion gone green in all political parties too - which translates to votes in elections irrespective of which party.
And why is a development not needed?
Well, let’s assume the Loxley prospect holds 50 bcf. Assuming a production well yields 5 bcf that means 10 production wells on, say, a 10 year plateau period - or about 5 bcf/year total field production. But 5 bcf is less than 2 LNG cargoes PER YEAR delivered to an existing UK terminal, assuming a typical LNG ship carries ~3 bcf.
Last winter, higher levels of LNG were supplied to UK’s network when compared to the previous winter. In a typical winter, the inter-connectors from Belgium and Holland to predominantly supply gas to the UK to supplement UK North Sea gas production. Last winter (2019/2020) the large levels of supply from LNG, coupled with lower national gas demand due to global warming & renewables, reversed the trend. LNG is trading at about $7/mcf cif, so imported LNG is cost competitive.
Meanwhile, the Chief Engineer driving the UKOG Gravy Train goes full steam ahead as it heads toward the buffers. Toot toot!