Member Info for earthling

Commenting on today's release, Mr Eduardo Valenzuela, the Company's Study Manager, said: "From a potential mining perspective, the updated proposed MRE, could provide not only a stronger resource base but also a larger and more cohesive high-grade core which could be mined at a higher production rate in the early years thus enhancing the project NPV and IRR."

Â

Exceptional assay results from recent infill and extension drilling at Alpala Central reveal a far more robust high-grade core than previously modelled.

To me that as my re results come in we say it’s priced in This can’t be true as if some believe current SP is fair value then obviously as we find more resource we would be undervalued etc etc I believe we are currently undervalued and think a fair SP currently would be in the 27-29p range at least

NM

"I would also say you need to go after a big, rich tier-one asset that can transcend generations,
always be profitable and can be developed yourself. That way, you create additional exit
opportunities for your shareholders because majors eventually have to buy you."

I don’t believe we will take this to production I also can’t see how ongoing drill results are priced in Current price prob based on MRE, not revised estimate The market doesn’t just value a share like this on production costs etc v resource There is some blue placed on the resource and potential of the resource and as such I believe we are undervalued at current levels I’m advance of a reply, this is just my opinion so need to take the high horse and start name calling as you have on occasions

on other boards this morning re these latest assays.

Results which most companies can only dream of getting

yes it has to be one of the best intercepts in history re hole 57

we are blue now

cant argue with those!

Ø Exceptional assay results from recent infill and extension drilling at Alpala Central reveal a far more robust high-grade core than previously modelled.

Ø Hole 57 (Alpala Central Infill):

832m @ 1.41% CuEq (0.72% Cu, 1.10g/t Au), incl.

562m @ 1.72% CuEq (0.85% Cu, 1.37g/t Au), incl.

304m @ 2.52% CuEq (1.15% Cu, 2.18g/t Au), incl.

182m @ 3.46% CuEq (1.49% Cu, 3.14g/t Au)

Ø Hole 55R (Alpala Central NW Extension):

1062m @ 1.02% CuEq (0.69% Cu, 0.52g/t Au), incl.

548m @ 1.36% CuEq (0.86% Cu, 0.80g/t Au), incl.

220m @ 2.07% CuEq (1.22%Cu, 1.34g/tAu)

Ø Hole 41-D1-D2 (Alpala Central Infill): Partial assay results to 1458m.

512m @ 1.09% CuEq (0.59% Cu, 0.80g/t Au), open at depth, incl.

326m @ 1.51% CuEq (0.77% Cu, 1.18g/t Au), open at depth, incl.

128m @ 2.51% CuEq (1.11% Cu, 2.23g/t Au), open at depth.

superb RNS

there won't be one other than to confuse us

they are meant to be confusing mate, thats one of their tactics.

yes Tuju, I have read several times in recent months how majors are less committed to buying out right assets with a huge price tag and instead getting a foot in the door, for example as a JV.

It would seem,It has to be pretty special in the current climate to be bought out right IMO, it always was of course, but even more so now.

Thats why I also believe this will be too good to be ignored, and with so few new tier 1 copper and gold discoveries, and copper demand set to increase, I'm confident when the revised estimate comes it will be good enough.

I think it was a board miner of Newcrest if I remember correctly? commenting after MRE saying

"thats a mine right there"

Follows therefore after revised estimate it will be a strengthened commitment to this.

Newcrest are a fairly big player, their investment here at 41p and knowledge and experience in block caving puts us in good stead Imo.

or the reverse of course where there is a put down ending with something apologetic or seemingly humble, but always with some criticism of someone or something in there.

with virtually every post ending with a put down of someone or something.

as I say, its not complicated its very obvious once one has had it pointed out.

thanks Tuju, an interesting piece that IMO, considering the number of major players searching for the next big copper deposit, we must be in with a good chance here, and thats why I'm staying put until we get what we are hoping for.

and Bozi, I didn't mean never respond to him/them, thats obviously your perogative, I meant that you seem to take what he says as the truth.

Its very clear the main culprit here often name drops and likes to be perceived as an expert, knowing more than the rest of us, so he frequently tells us, and been in the top ranks of deals and rumblings. I have very good reasons, which I will keep to myself for now, why I personally believe a lot of what this poster says is nothing more than bravado and mind games.

its not difficult to spot tbh, eg someone who is confident does not feel the ned to name drop and subtly or directly threaten others, as he frequently does.

someone with a fair level of self worth would not feel the need to behave as he does on this bb

why some on here continue to take what these 3 say seriously?

I agree Columbo IMO This will be too good to be ignored by majors With double the amount of drilling since MRE and NM had already said he expects the high grade to increase significantly Looking forward to some assays to give us confirmation

this is all about the drill, thats what we are here for, well not yourself obviously!