RE: AG reviews16 Jun 2019 21:44
Pete you were proven right but my arguement back then was based on what we were publically led to believe at the time which you do know.
It was put in black and white on the website and it was there because following our disagreement when you came back from the egm and put into question everything we were being told, I pressed directly for clarification and I got it, with that resulting in it being made public.
That contradicted your position which I could not ignore at the time. That is now water under the bridge for me but I actually think we should talk personally sometime, clear the air and set a few things straight, you might then just retract some of the sarcasm you send my way.