Member Info for DrAnomoly

Red, this is getting a bit tired now. You keep trying to turn every discussion into a character trial because it saves you having to deal with the actual point. That is not analysis, it is just bad-faith theatre with a share price chart pinned to the wall. In other words - Red🤡

Lets see, you last line.... 'DYOR, but don't listen to Anomaly, Al, Swazers and Castle, they've called it seriously wrong for 10 years +++!!' - I think everyone on LSE understands what 'calling it wrong' means. As for AI, yeah ok, whatever you think - I was genuinely trying to have a conversation, but back to the childish insults - well ok, in the words of Castle I will just have to refer to the following.... Red🤡

Testpack, you do seem to get terribly excited whenever someone discusses strategy without first asking your permission.

You are also wrong, again. My previous posts were not deleted because of an avatar change, and I have not had anything removed to hide some great archive of price predictions. That is just another one of your little forum myths, the sort you roll out when the actual argument becomes inconvenient.

The point I made was simple. I have not spent ten years calling PHE price targets. I have looked at the company through strategy, positioning, commercial route to market and execution risk. You may dislike that, but disliking something is not the same as disproving it. Difficult concept, I know, but worth a brave attempt.

As for whether PHE’s strategy, market positioning and commercial pathways are working, the honest answer is mixed. Historically, progress has been far too slow. Commercial delivery has not been good enough. The market has punished that. Nobody sensible denies it.

But that is not the same as saying there is no strategic value, no route to market, and no improvement in the current picture. The FTU, third-party engineering work, sales agreements, Ballymena, Australia, Green Gecko, HUI, and the wider shift toward energy security all matter. They do not guarantee success, but they are not nothing.

Your problem is that you only have one setting: sneer, declare failure, then pretend repetition is analysis. It is not. It is just a man shaking a snow globe and calling it weather forecasting.

You can keep shouting “liar” if it helps the breakfast settle, but the question remains the same for both PHE and HUI: can they convert interest into funded projects, contracts and revenue?

That is the real test. Not your amateur psychoanalysis, not your archive fantasies, and not another theatrical post dressed up as forensic insight.

Red, just to tidy up one point before it gets turned into bulletin-board archaeology, I haven’t been calling PHE price targets for ten years. That is not really my thing. I tend to look at strategy, market positioning, commercial pathways and whether the story is getting stronger or weaker. Share price prophecy belongs in the same drawer as tea leaves, horoscopes and AIM certainty.

On your HUI/PHE comparison, I think you are making a fair point in one area, but then pushing it too far.

Yes, HUI may look closer to certain commercial conversations because it is positioning around proven InEnTec technology and project origination. That gives it a different profile. It may well be easier to talk to some markets with a technology that already has operational reference points, but that does not automatically make PHE redundant, nor does it mean PHE has no pipeline or no strategic value. That feels like an overreach.

HUI and PHE are not identical businesses. HUI looks more like a project developer and commercial route-to-market vehicle. PHE is trying to commercialise its own technology, and that comes with a different risk profile. Slower, messier, more frustrating, absolutely. But not the same thing as “nothing there”.

The bit about PHE being engineers rather than salespeople may actually be closer to the real issue than perhaps intended. A lot of early-stage technology companies suffer from that. Technical capability arrives before commercial muscle. That is why the recent sales agreements, FTU activity, third-party engineering work and regional routes matter. They are attempts to fix the commercial side, not pretend the historic delays did not happen.

On HUI, I agree the key question is whether the news flow turns into signed contracts and meaningful economics. That is the grown-up test. A funded Fortress Fuel system would be a different level of validation. Until then, it remains promising, but still execution-dependent.

Same with PHE. It needs project progression, commercial orders and visible revenue. Nobody gets a trophy for “potential”, despite AIM investors trying their best to award one every other Thursday.

So I’d put it this way: HUI may currently have the cleaner commercial story, but PHE should not be written off simply because its route to market is harder and has taken longer. Both need conversion. Both carry risk. The difference is in structure, maturity and route to value, not some neat cartoon version where one is genius and the other is a corpse with 5bn shares attached.

Https://www.share-talk.com/powerhouse-energy-ceo-talks-strategy-and-recent-developments/

Red, if that’s your best comeback, even the horse has filed a welfare complaint.

Testpack, your return is always like finding an old betting slip in a coat pocket, worthless, crumpled, and somehow still convinced it nearly won

Red, if I wanted racing tips from someone who keeps backing the same grievance to come last, I’d ask the bloke shouting at the bookies’ TV after six pints.

Red, you’re not looking for enlightenment, you’re looking for an argument, and sadly I’ve already donated enough time to that particular charity.

Red, that time is over for you and the usual numpties. I’ll gladly engage with honest doubt. I have less interest in bad-faith pantomime.

congrats, red, probably your most disengenious load of *******s to date.

Go on then i will play along: https://www.safclearinghouse.uk/news/press-release-uk-government-funds-four-sustainable-aviation-fuel-innovators-accelerate?utm_source=chatgpt.com - anyone else here with any ties at all to PHE?

Still all happening red, more soon.

Sorry, Red, I gave up at the first sentence. Does anyone else read dummy, and could they translate, please?

Kind of proved my point, RH. You are about as funny as a case of herpes, but there you go, can't wait for your, oh so completely predictable reply. Maybe the twat will chime in too - that would be a perfect day eh?

'Even Swazers and his mate have abandon this board' - er, nope, just nothing to say, the RNS is about a negotiation for a license, and that's about it. Either way, I won't be providing much going forward as this is just a dysfunctional, toxic excuse for a 'forum', its usefulness died about 3 years ago and just garbage posted now in the main. Hopefully, in the future, a DMG will be able to recycle the trash posted here, but it's calorific free i guess but its a shame the hot air can't be used.

Now, if you loosen standards slightly and allow near-words it gets more interesting:

Flog rent plc → sounds like a company specialising in extracting value from people

Forget plc → probably the most on-the-nose “negative rebrand” you’ll get

Rotten plc → needs one extra “t”, but everyone will read it that way anyway

Flog Trent plc → oddly specific, vaguely sinister

Left prong plc → sounds like a failed strategy document

Hope everyone is well - I sold a while back and just can't believe the story here... (not in a good way alas).

Ok testy, byyyeeeee.........

Https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=cjcSSF1acZU

If you don't like it, i really don't care, I won't be replying to any comments.

Yeah, ok Stockhunter, well it's an interview that was given this week to a trade magazine - you can do with it what you will, I really don't give a toss - just sharing it, but again, god knows why, as all this board seems to be for is talking about other stocks and FUD and not much else.