Member Info for Dracula1

IMO, Aim market over the years has been turned Into a Shorter's and Traders Market. It's no place for anyone that want's to take a chance on a start up. Which I Imagine It was designed for. One thing for sure It's hard enough for any new start up to survive without having the addition of Shorting to contend with. How any Gov allows such carry on Is near unbelievable. It half defeats the purpose that the AIM was set up to do IMO.

BobsSocks , your Not listening. I'm Invested. I'll win or lose. You want me to read your posts. Why bother. You can't make up you mind. You said " I (you) may be wrong". I just gave you an opinion. When you contact the Patent office not to include that statement. You being an Intelligent person.....would you pay any heed to a scrip that contained that verse. From anyone. No matter what opinion you or anybody else has. Qbt will succeed or not. My chips are down. IMO.

BobsSocks, your a bit confused. "Perhaps I should contact the UK Patent office" and "after all I may be wrong".

A suggestion for you. Before you contact the Patent Office . Ask someone to draft out a few words for you. I'd Leave out the bit about you may be wrong. IMO.

BobsSocks. Check It out. Your posting history explains your situation more than your posts. What ever will Be Will be no matter what you or anybody else posts. Investors like me might be lucky and turn a profit sometime OR we might Lose It all.

With respect Bobs. I took a chance In a very volatile Market. A very volatile Sector. I'll win or Lose. I took a chance on well educated and Intelligent people than myself. With so many posts on QBT rather than the minute amount you have on others. QBT seems to be bothering you a lot. Would you not consider your positions In All your share holdings?. IF you are Invested In QBT reduce and divide among the others you hold. Whatever position QBT are In , they are In.

Let the dice fall where ever It does. AIMO.

Violin, You could be right. LTSHs are the foolish ones. Maybe after 11 years In Pharmas It's time to get something back somehow. The three now two that I'm Invested In. The only people that profited from them over the years were the Traders.

Similar to a lot of the LTSHs. You feel If you do your letting down the side. I wouldn't like to trade a Pharma stock .Doesn't feel right. Seemingly the only way to profit from AIM shares.

Sadly, similar to many AIM Shares Too many traders of QBT to progress until major news. Hopefully the LTSHs will be rewarded sometime.

I'm glad that posters are seeing Some light. I got hammered by some for offering the same opinion. I Invested In Sclp because I believe In the Co. The Science we are told Is great the Scientists are Great. Other ends of the business such as communications with SHs need to be corrected. It's unbelievable that the Query on the last Rns has Still not been explained. As for presentations IMO a Co needs to present at so many after that the more they present at seems to me to be Still trying to flog something to a new comer. Check the SP after many. Sclp and It's products around long enough for All Pharmas that may be Interested to have made an approach. And Still holding Strong all my (few) shares. AIMO.

Absolutely Violin.

Too many positives anyway. Will be explained later I'm sure.

Thanks Burble, you're a gent.

Burble with respect. A layman's question, maybe completely stupid. Is a mistake In print possible . Or Is the cancer In that patient acting completely erratic to the treatment. Or Visa Versa the treatment Is acting completely erratic In that patient.

Now we have, Introducing Roses, The Clairvoyant, sadly another Clueseau and not very good. Why don't you check what shares I hold. That can't be much of a problem for a person with your experience. I'm Still holding since the start without Ever selling one Share. Is It not unbelievable that I'm not getting the barrage of abuse from the over confident I use to get after any of my posts here. Even the would be Shakspeare has stopped. I wonder why?. Let me guess. would It be that the over confident thought as I did that Sclp would be In a partnership and a far better MC position than It Is. I believe that If any Pharma Is to succeed Sclp must fit the criteria. How valuable or when Is anybody's guess.

TF, As it seems you took the time to build a profile on me. It's beginning to appear that you may be a front runner for the Inspector Clouseau position. Get real. Me "Lay the ground" with a miniscule amount of shares I hold. "you don't think that there was any Promised reward". You don't think?. Most of us believe that nothing can be promised. I leave It at that. There Is too many corrections to be made In your post for me to bother with.

Carry on monitoring the BB I won't be bothering you again. Good luck.

Violin/CW,

Absolutely, Genmab, Biontech, and Sclps Pipeline are the Very good reasons to be Invested here. IMO, It's

the reason the SP Is not lower. I'd like to know Redmile and Vulpus opinions. I hope their very happy. It Is one major satisfaction to me anyway that the Four have Interest. AIMO

Burble , With respect. SHs and Sclp need something to stop the SP decline. Sclp seem to have the goods. What happens If the SP keeps falling... a cheap buyout?. Aimo.

Bojo, You asked "Why would they Ignore It" sure that's s what I've being asking. How are they showing that they are not?. The SP Is the same as when they had much less achieved. Maybe It's because as you say Sclp are Swamped. Have taken too much on. Had a shot at Covidity. I mentioned at the time that they were Too late. Redmile like most small LTSHs have very little to show SP wise. As to SCIB1 that compound has shown excellent results years ago and seemed to have been put on the shelf at the time. Where we go forward from here depends on our two big Investors.

How ever with all the silence lets hope It Is golden and something big Is brewing. AIMO

Bojo, with respect I/we know that trials need be completed. I could be Incorrect but I was of the opinion that Redmile at the time they Invested was for a period of a few years. Not to keep supporting on going trials. s that not the business that Redmile supply?, support a Co until It well on It's feet?. Give a Co enough money to advance the Trials to Phase 1/11. Then Hope the Co achieve good results that will propel the SP to a respectable SP and then gradually with draw

The one positive that I hold on to Is. The Sclp scientific leadership side I believe Is first class. The most recent results were very good or so we're told. Our two major Investors are still with us. The late Final results were not Sclp's fault. So I'm having a guess that there Is a v good reason for the silence and the late poster. IMO.