Participate in Share Chat. Set up virtual watchlists and portfolios See more trades and share info.
Register for FREE Now
donnodertrader
Posted in: NCYT
Posts: 1,518
not as far as I could see
I did not see ncyt mentioned in the article did I miss it??
thank you
thanks Johnny
Quickdraw re They state they are working in partnership with Novacyt. can you clarify who 'they are'? thanks
tedoby can you explain what that means??
thanks DR Thomas that was confirmed on the board last night!!
no I wouldn't if it had been new surely there would have been a rns!!!
just come on this evening. has there been a conclusion to the question as to whether the logos have been there for some months or are they new??
Aber don't worry they will be back
exactly!!!
yes I was not aware that they were in use yet! I am sure it would receive huge coverage
can we please be accurate when we report information. short hand or assumptions presented as factual accounts can have consequences for bb contributors
does anyone know the context in which this was said? it is unusual for PHE to make such a clearly commercially sensitive statement.
companies frequently issue an rns to correct media inaccuracy
https://www.boursorama.com/bourse/forum/1rPALNOV/
it is my understanding that PHE have already approved the ncyt test
no it will be the other way around!!
someone pointed out to me that the priority members show one price and the rest another
irrelevant
Create a free LSE account to:
Already have an account? Sign In
Don't have an account? Register for FREE