RE: RE: RE: Nomad18 Oct 2017 10:33
Part of an FT article by Kate Burgess 3 days ago.
"Last week the exchange � for the first time � publicly stripped a deputy of its Nomad licence. ZAI Corporate Finance, a specialist in advising ventures from frontier markets such as Africa and China, must hand in its badge this week. Its dozen-or-so clients have to find another Nomad or quit Aim. ZAI � which was Nomad to Naibu � has not done enough deals or have enough qualified executives to meet the LSE�s criteria for a licence.
The LSE also impelled ZAI to send a letter to clients last month explaining that its uncertain finances might compromise its ability to act as a Nomad. It turns out that not only is the LSE proposing to fine ZAI �650,000 for unspecified rule book breaches stretching back years, but ZAI faces a winding up petition from the taxman. And then there are legal costs attached to an unsuccessful attempt by ZAI to have the LSE�s case against it heard openly.
The LSE�s tougher stance is to be applauded. But it should not stop there. It is right to worry about the effect of public disciplinary hearings on third parties. However, Aim should be equally wary of its Nomad set-up being seen as a private club, as Justice Mostyn described it earlier this year when considering ZAI�s demand for a public hearing. �Tenure as a Nomad is much more akin to membership of a private club than that of a regulated profession,� the judge said. Perhaps it is time to change the system."