RE: VOTE "NO"14 Apr 2025 13:19
What huge debt? The ex bond holders wrote it off (circa £20 million) for a 60% stake in the company after the share reorg and consolidation. The company is now paying to get rid of Duyung and writing off it's value of $18.9 million in exchange for this
· "the release of Coro Duyung from any obligation to pay existing or future cash calls;
· a total cash consideration of US$300,000 to be paid by Coro to WNEL following Shareholder Approval. This payment represents a US$477,000 saving on the amounts Conrad maintains is outstanding by Coro Duyung as at the end of December 2024;" We then get 500,000 new Conrad shares which are locked in for 12 months. I don't think those shares will cover $18.9 million do you?
With regard to Parsons still working behind the scenes I have asked the question as well as ,an explanation why they deem fit to give Duyung away by emailing the company and Vigo Consulting. I mean they could've asked the ex bond holders for $1 million to cover Conrad's costs or raised that when they did the share consolidation. Whole thing stinks and I will vote NO for what good it will do. I'm flabberghasted that the ex bond holders can agree to this as Duyung was the main driver for them to provide the finance in the first place.