Member Info for Devilbhoy

From the posts here that I can actually see, which given the number of posters I filter is admittedly not many, it’s apparent that nobody appears to understand that consolidation and share buy backs do not achieve the same outcome.

Dickbat by name ……..

As explained now, don’t be caught out listening to or believing people who post utter drivel like this.

What is the point of your thread? Keep issuing convertible bonds and of course you can increase your cash position.

“Lets hope the next 3 years are not the same but those that are 80-90% down on their investment need 800-900% just to get to breakeven”

I think you need to check your maths.

jabberba - I’ve only read your last three posts and already know you are a complete knob.

Wrong way around. $1 CAD = £0.59. That’s obscene enough.

£1 or £2?

Delusional or desperate.

And by the way, it’s not only if they said what they allegedly said to the client. They are prohibited from saying anything that could be remotely construed as advice to anyone including colleagues and external parties regardless of whether they are a client or not, including acquaintances, friends and family.

Okay. You make your decisions based on the unverifiable claim that a random frontline customer call centre agent whom almost certainly knows nothing about investing (never mind being someone who should not and is not allowed under FCA rules to make statements that could be construed as advice) proffered an opinion on a company they almost certainly know nothing about.

I’m sure that strategy sets you up for positive outcomes.

“I would not make this up and no client information was ever mentioned, just in general terms of why someone would buy COPL now.”

You have changed your story already. A few minutes ago you said “They confirmed they acted on behalf of a client, whom has invested in COPL, and expects the SP to increase”.

So which is it? The client expects the share price to increase or that is the opinion of a random mystery customer service advisor (in which case that could be construed as giving advice and therefore they and Spreadex should be reported to the FCA)?

GenghisInvestor

If I was to elaborate on why posts are utter pish I wouldn’t have time to do anything else given the amount of posts on this board that are utter pish.

Anyone who isn’t a blithering idiot should understand why and anyone that doesn’t shouldn’t be investing.

And how on earth would a random customer service advisor have any knowledge of a client’s expectations and motivations?

Your claim would be laughable if it wasn’t so pathetically and obviously ludicrous to any semi-intelligent individual.

Who did you speak to? Assuming you reply Spreadex, you really expect me to believe they divulged anything about a client’s holding and position to a random third party?

“Whether this is Spreadex themselves, or a client of Spreadex, it shows confidence and the view that the share price will be going up.”

What utter pish.

You couldn’t be more wrong.

You are a fn idiot. That’s all everyone with a modicum of intelligence knows.

"Looks like it's heading back under 20p"
looks like it isn't....

Didn’t age well. That’s the problem with making definitive statements that are obviously daft statements to make.

“Added £5k at 170-171. Watch this bounce”

Well this bold prediction hasn’t aged well.

“88e 20 billion in issue and mc of £126 mil”

And your point is?