Member Info for Daytradenovice

Coasty.
The FACT remains 37% voted against, and its not my "missed out" one its a real FACT.

You might not like it being underwater, as you have stated already, but its a FACT. Whether the numbers are 100 or one trillion. 37% voted against it. Whats so difficult to grasp there?

Being underwater obviously clouds your view, we see it here day after day from your flag wavey posts.
But do keep up the pretense all is well eh, makes people chuckle.

Thank you James, absolutely right.
Ive lost interest in how many the gaffers hold, but its likely a fair few, and as you say with those guaranteed to vote in favour of rewarding themselves the vote was extremely tight. Shows there is a lot of dissapointment out there, im afraid.

"But in the interest of detail maybe you could highlight all the press coverage, because a simple Google search highlights hardly any. Other than this money, which is the shorter mouthpiece"

Plenty of people have already done that, from multiple media sources. Look for yourself. The truth is out there.
"shorters mouthpiece" , could be considered defamatory towards Thisismoney. Any FACTUAL evidence of your biased opinion? didnt think so.

Engage

Really, is that right?

Wouldnt everybodys opinion actually be classed as 'biased', afterall its there point of view isnt it. lol. And you wouldnt dream of doing similar, what a clown.

Why i bother is none of your business, maybe because there are to many bs merchants on here and those wearing that hat need exposing. Just a thought. Maybe the media produce made up stories then. The FACT is there was a significant rebellion, yet you choose to ignore that FACT.

Dont see you calling your sidekick out yet either for his digusting 'cupping balls' comments. Any reason for that?

Oh, and stop engaging with me. You promised. Remember.

"1. Growth plan approved to align business with so" - with a serious rebellion by a significant % number of holders, as highlighted heavily in the press, but thats probably clickbait, right?

"2. EBT to buy up to £10m shares." - probably imv designed to help prop up the sp by buying unwanted stock at 'bargain basement' compared to previous highs, prices.

Lets not obscure the details eh!

Wrong thread Coasty
Suggest that maybe its your rudder thats adrift (again)

You wont change your behaviour tradey, you just cant.
You'll still be loudly critisising everything anybody posts that doesnt fit your 'shove it down everyones throat' bullying narrative.
Personally, i couldnt care less whether you "engage" or not, its so hard to keep up with your current 'wont engage' intentions as they change 'post by post', and as well as being samey boring they are quite irrelevent in that you only see things the way you want and are 'closed' to any form of debate or negativity, as your views are wholey inmovable. Its a poor stanse for any successful investor.
Its why you often state "i wont engage" and in the next post do exactly that. So predictable.

Your money, your opinion and your choice of course to wave the flag, but do try and understand that others are also entitled to disagree and view things differently without being abused by you everytime. You alone press your 'buy' button and purchase stock, once done each person alone bears the financial risk of their own decision, taking frustration out on others is not acceptable.

Indeed we are all entitled to a view. If that continues to trouble you, then its quite easy for you to filter individuals you dont want to read post and "engage" with (said in Patrick Stewart voice)

I wont be missing your nasty abusive comments aimed in my direction, they shall be reported, and i encourage others to do similarly when they too are abused.

Good luck with your investements, my view is, you'll need it here.

That is some warchest Shien are building Swingman. Certainly isnt going to be welcome news in the BOO camp, although the article does indicate it'll be a while before its up and running. Not known for tardiness though the Chinese, so a definate watch this space.

You keep trying to spin the truth tradey, its not working.
Your 'i know everything' cover is completely blown, and you know it, hence all the personal abuse and attacks on a daily basis.
Its quite sad really, one should realy be enjoying retirement in a more constructive and enjoyable manner.

So you randomly googled, found and posted 'upto date' data from 2013 and 2014? as i said.

Very odd old stuff to repost when moaning about 'out of date'. Nothing newer availible?

which was all sent by lse to the same "wenlock00" account? as i said

Find it very suspicious that all that ancient data went to the same individual. Most folk would, wouldnt you agree.

As well as the current data on the site, which we are all already aware of.

Best take a better look.
The only charts on that article are relevent and show the decline in share price for boo and asos.

There are NO charts on there that "construe a chart that shows shorts" at all.

Nor did i suggest or mention one.

"Great post from daytrade... Posting out of date data and telling us its out of date.
Maybe just post the up to date data?"

Have to laugh, coasty critsises a post with background data that was clearly indicated (just the numbers bit) thats 3 days old for being "out of date"

But his previous post was full of data about moderators thats EIGHT OR NINE years old and totally out of date. Couldnt make it up.

Interestingly, all responses he has posted appear to have been sent to "Wenlock00" ?
is that your duplicate Id on here coasty? as that account is still live?

Usual guff from flag waver coasty

Didnt you read the part about 'useful background onfo and scary charts'?

of course not, doesnt suit the rampy agenda

Couple of days old (6 march) and figures are now slightly different but quite interesting piece about shorts here, some nice background and quite scary charts.

Probably just "paid for clickbait content" with superlow readership, but its out there none the less.

https://www.trustnet.com/news/13365060/shorting-firms-bet-against-boohoo-but-ease-on-asos

If challenging serial rampers and bs merchants offends you then that is a shame.
To many of that type on this platform.

You can just use the filter if you wish, its really easy, but trying to bully people off the platform with nonsense repeated accusations and continual reporting is a bit lame.

"t4g - 38% voting against a resolution is huge for a company's resolution."

Absolutely spot on, highly relevent.

tradey

Your moral stance is interesting, my comment is not "disgusting filth" on iota, it is simply a comment.
However, your moral compass seems to ignore that particular posters vulgarity about "cupping", when he clearly described it earlier (now removed) as holding mens genitalia in ones hand.

THAT is disgisting filth, with no shadow of any doubt at all.

But reporting such genuine disgusting filth doesnt fit your flag waving narrative at all, does it.

What battles?
No "battles" as far as im concerned, am just posting media articles and responding to others posts.
Use the filter if you dont want to read my opinions and posts.
Its quite easy to do if your unhappy.

Still the Thomas's PP1?
IT guy last time i looked into it if i remember correctly.
Must make something from all the ads on here and the level two subs.

New article posted 5 hours ago from protestors who were manhandled out from an sustainability event in Feb.

https://gal-dem.com/boohoo-sustainable-ethical-protest/