Member Info for Daytradenovice

John

Indeed everyday is a school day for most. Shame there are a couple on here that just boeat out the same guff and never seem to pay attention in class.

Some exellent informative posts by Ragtrade today, who clearly has his finger on the pulse with the beh8nd the scenes shenanigans of BOO. The more i hear about the business and its MO, the more it smells 'Ratner' to me

Completely understand your position Ragtrade, and thank you very much for your insightful industry specific posts today, very informative and welcomed.

Good luck with your 38.5kmholdings, hope that comes good for you at some point, but totally agree with the risk/reward position with the business side of things. Id be adding a few feet to the 40 footer as well i think.

Ahhhh yeah, the old oft trotted out "market manipulation" guff.

With so much evidence to back the barmy claims up he's declined to write to the FCA setting out the proof. Even when somebody, helpfully, provided all the required contact details.

It'll be the shorters next, then the 'trolls', then the "toothless fca", then uncle tom cobley etc etc etc. same old same old.

I think id far rather take more notice of Ragtrades opinion, who is actually in 'the game' as such, rather than some flag waver sitting on a loss.

Quite clearly, BOO suppliers are not best pleased with the business, and who can blame them after imposing yet another 'mandatory' discount, this time of 30%.

Quite shocking, and no surprise that Ragtrade, who was pro-BOO is not quite so much any longer and has refused to supply them product.

Says all you need to know.

"trading4good

Posts: 10,588

Price: 43.35

No Opinion

RE: This most recentToday 16:06

Daytrade didn't you once post about three whole pages of Uncledougs posts on here.

Absolute fool"

You mean all those posts of his ramping this upto £4.50 and saying how he'd "topped up heavily" in the 200's 300's 400's.

Yes i did. No trouble confirming that, and he still to this day claims he's made a profit, which is the funniest th8ng ive ever read from a serial ramper.

And yes, i agree. He is a fool.

It doesnt need any help with that tradey, and nothing said on this platform could remotely influence the markets view of this former 'covid bubble darling' thats fell on hard times now the market is more 'normal' once again.

What you continually fail to accept is that BOO has managed its sp decline all by itself of late with poor performance poor media poor sales etc etc etc - have you not seen the 85%+ fall in sp, or been living on the moon.

There is a multitude of information out there simply allowing the market to value this turkey at a mere fraction of its former value, despite all the wanton flag waving nonsense from a few people like you on here.

The sp is 43p for a reason, and its not because im, (as a holder) "trashing it" or making any difference at all with what i post.

Coasty you really are just a child in an adults body arnt you.

"I wonder if they are trying to consciously slim down the supply chain and focus more on UK. "

What a load of guff.

They could 'slim down the supply chain' by just not placing further orders with suppliers of their choosing. Its really easy.

This nonsense is NO reason to screw suppliers to the floor with stupid mandatory 30% after the fact invoice reductions.

Smacks of desparation to me

Golden, you know the two stoogies on here will never change their ways.

The ladies are not for turning

Gazillions,

Dont worry about bitter old coasty, he trots this nonsense out about duplicate accounts periodically with just about everybody to try and cause trouble.

Ive actually reported his lying post to lse, with a suggestion they carry out a suitable check on my ip address to confirm he's a liar and take whatever action they deem suitable with him once done.

You do love a conspiracy theory about multiple accounts dont you coasty.

Acuse practically everybody of having duplicates with regular abandon.

Makes you sound a bit simple fella, im afraid.

lse would clock it quite quickly as against the rules.

Tough to police with the likes of vpn's, but im sure if youd like to suggest that i have ANY duplicates to LSE they could check that my ip address is in fact a static one so easily proven.

Your not in the greenhouse chucking stones again, are you?

Be waiting for those longer than your justification/explanation for your £6.50 rampy rubbish coasty.

Perhaps you could also furnish us with a reason why youve now suddenly lowered your estimation to £4.35?

Still ten times the sp lol.

Seems like a race to the bottom to me, this 'i'll up my margin at your expense' hacking off of your suppliers.

Fancy choosing to go down that road as a supposed 'growth' business. Sounds far more like bullying to most i suspect.

At least its a race that BOO is well placed to win, for once.

Was thinking that the other day Golden, seems to have been a damp squib there, not much in the media from her that im seeing.

Another one just taking the money i suspect.

No it isnt tradey, you need to learn to read correctly, because, as usual you got that wrong. Didnt you lol

Nice attempt at a swerve onto something else though, would never have thought youd try that :)

Coasty, its nice up in Scotland (midges apart), you should get out of Bournemouth or whatever retirement town you live down there and experience the rest of the UK a bit more before knocking it.

Its a wonderful country and no need to travel to the other side of the pond for some of that clean water to rinse your mouth woth.

Tradeyboy

Who said anything about "on top of", except you?

I posted this 'Chopping off 30%, as well as just 10% is quite the chunk'

Quite clearly not "on top of" isnt it.

Try learning to read

Well do enjoy getting some clean water to bathe in for a change coasty rather than the polluted stuff you usually paddle in and regurgitate, but do please ensure you check in loads of times a day to back your pal up wont you? Have to keep up the ancient cut n pastes and ramp numbers.

Im off to Scotland on wednesday night, more walkies in the mountains, so, alas, wont be around for a few days at least to see if your 'walked back on' £6.50 prediction comes true.

How come its been reduced to £4.35 now - supplier reductions? ?

Ragtrade

I just wonder how the fools who see this sort of practice as positive will try and spin your post.

Taking your post on face value as an affected supplier on here, your involved 'coalface' view is clearly more a barometer of what is a big "asking" from BOO.

Congratulations on looking elsewhere for your product, you can only skin a cat a little before it scarpers.

Again Gazillions, two excellent posts, not suprised to see the board stasi knocking both the recent report, certainly wasnt an old "rehash" as erroneously claimed, as well as your posts themselves. The controlling fool always claims to know best, on every subject, we're all used to him.

Whether legal or not currently, you can be sure that BOO's suppliers will be fed up of being "asked" for haircuts to their contracted prices. Chopping off 30%, as well as just 10% is quite the chunk, especially after delivery, and regardless, those suppliers wont like it thats for sure.