RE: TOXIC3 Jul 2023 16:39
Oh i know what i posted you clown tradey, i can read it quite well, you should try too.
"So clearly in your strange mind Boo is the only company where execs and directors need bonuses to stop them falling asleep at their desks!"
Did i say that? no i didnt.
you really shouldnt continually attack people with insults then try and put words in peoples mouths when telling porkies about them.
I am well aware of bonuses being used to reward management.
Unfortunately you seem incapble of grasping my point that BOO is planning on doing exactly that (rewarding failure), despite p1s5 poor performance over years, whereas Revb are rewarding mr holt for doing the exact opposite!
Maybe BOO should poach Mr Holt onto its board to turn the turkey around in a similar manner, although he does appear to have standard so likely would refuse.
To emotionally attached to this share is your trouble, not good for your blood pressure and what a waste of your retirement being on here all day everyday
11 thousand posts in a mere 3 years, quite shocking.
"Also, unlike Revb, the Boo director's incentives were put to a vote. "
Oh yeah, one which they dominate votes by % so was a nailed on certainty, like a dictatorship lol, yet they still had a major rebellion with quite a strong % against from the 'non benifitting' vote. See Mr Holt had the nads to spend his hard earned on more shares too - dont see the BOD doing the same, very odd dont you think if this is such a good business and suffering a temporary blip?
"Keep posting the lies and make believe daytrade you come across as more and more of a fool."
Yeah right, i didnt get the sp action wrong here from the highs did i? You did, and are so so obviously sore about it lol. Nor do continue to ne so whilst trying my best to patrol the board daily and dismiss any other views or opinions with abuse etc.
Busted flush you are im afraid old boy, shown up all day long by quite a few now, and seemingly repeating the same MO on HMI as well now.
Sign In
Follow the stocks
