Member Info for Culpepper

Lifted this from AI, but it puts it well.

“Long-term value creation: The company leverages its expertise and knowledge of the region to create long-term value for its shareholders and stakeholders by revitalizing existing mines and discovering new resources.”

They’re doing that, under a creative, innovate CEO.

Paul FG.

Thankyou for your thoughts. It adds to my experience as a mining commentator. Nil. And anybody else’s thoughts. I think Ive become a fanboy, as previously accused and warned against.

I just know it’s in the drill, after they finish wandering around cracking bits off rocks.

Bit more with mines, intended mines, in the near term, is where I’m at.

Proving Nalunaq, Nanoq, up, is, in my view where it’s at.

Just now, for 50% of the business, over time, to pay for better.

Amrq in its infancy, in Greenland, my view ( as a fanboy )

No mention of conspiracies, or mms - doing their job on demand or otherwise.

Nice to see.

Whatever might be said about what the DFS might do immediately on release, keepp a few bob up your sleeve.

There you go.

All the best.

Thankyou for your summary Howezap. Puts it well.

As I mentioned before, the MRE4 cut-off rate at 5.9gms per ton, allowing for a gold price of £2100 per oz, might also be revisited in MRE 5 when it comes next year. With a maiden MRE for Nanoq.

New year is a pivotal point for the company, establishing a p/e for the first time.

It’s not hard to imagine, at least, an improved resources update, and longevity beyond the 10 years, currently last speculated.

And that’s only Nalunaq.

Nanoq - who knows what might be there?

Don’t know what you’re getting at. On what you say.

Seems some want to buy Sol, some were content to sell Greatland.

It’s shares for you. Majority prevail.

They’re generally not after hours trades but them dealt with earlier and delayed reporting. ie done and dusted during the day, or a couple, and finally dealt with, and reported.

You lot seem consumed with it. You know why you are. I’m not.

And the old shorting business again.

Maybe a hedge, whatever, I don’t know, nor do you.

Rubbish, isn’t it?

Take a step back.

No short on the basis of price debasement will win.

If you think it’s likekely, at least sell your profit.

You all know, whatever is posted on here, the reality is what is in the price. You also know, that it was pontificated on here that ASX would be the answer to all things.

Judge it for yourselves, experience versus conspiracy, I suppose.

The idea that share orice going down, is indicative of them buying more than sold,, ‘wanting your shares’ just now, just to me, is so much crap

I retain a core holding.

A sort of equanimity might be if you take on board the share orice, as against the comments on here, by those made by, or adjudged idiots, or sages.

You, like me, will see where we go. Gold price is not the sole arbiter. Grade, and the rest, operations, is.

Ggp 19.

I don’t care, but that sort of post seems to be typical, on here, of what counts as relav3nt.

Sellers come to an end.

And ‘jam tomorrow’, Amrq say, will start with commercial nameplate capacity, 2026, , maybe a tiny tad earlier.

It’ll need work8ng up though, for best results.

I see no reason to disbelieve what has been published.

i hope for the best here, long term.

far too much bull**** though, and citing other irrelevant companies, with little in-depth analysis, in the abs3nce of anything else to say. usual suspects.

this’ll have to prove up. i think we’re waiting for that.

seems to me they’ll have to shift tonnage, on the grades, to best effect.

no matter wahat bamps foresees in years to come.

You’re talking of boards.

Bit of a joke, that, isn’t it? Idiots, you call them. . Protecting capital or not.

Tons of views, including Numptiies extraordinaire.

You hate what I post, but I don’t know what DFS will do to the price, on the day. I do know, I take profit and protect capital.

It)s a long haul, to spend the money to achieve the end benefit.

I retain a core holding. I trade, if that’s what you want to call it..Many do.

Noswej is just a disruptor.

I have always been middle of road, taking it as it comes at the time, and saying what I believe.

‘They’, and there is a ‘they’, dissent frequently. Theyre wrong in thise terms.

Market is lead to believe there’s a lot to come from Telfer, over years.

They’re not, without evidence, believing it.

You have to look at the nearer term, don’t you, when looking at it with risks.

And then at the longer term, with risks. Buying and selling when you want.

Money. Near term, lowest level, as expressed, 12gms. per ton over 350 tons per day, minimum.

Pretty good, to support ongoing. Whatever you don’t know, what make of, gold price.

Aint going below $2000 per oz, at which Amrq remains profitable - well, Nalunaq anyway,

Barring news.

Catch you later.

apart from what’s posted, i take profit when i have it. not just here.

so, you know, you do your own thing. everyone does, don’t they?

and put it somewhere, or not, as they think fit.

the board is individuals, whatever they say, buying, selling, bull****ting.

If that’s for me, dunno, it pleases me at the time.

Same as the rest..

Why does anyone bovver, in their posts goldfish bowl.

This way, that way……..

Youre all, as usual, getting over excited, one way or another.

And some need, in their posts, to differentiate between $,US or AUD.

You always knew Telfer was a necessary acquisition to bring Hav in, despite the then posting.

You got it.

Means to an end.

So, to me, without getting over excited on Amrq building as the go to diversified Greenland producer, explorer, there are 2 outcomes.

1. Full cycle gold mining company, with revenue/profit, looking to advance other projects, such as Black Angel, utilising their experience model.

2. Being bought out, by them bigger companies looking to get an in on Greenland.

Then, I suppose, you can still consider the underlying Trump/EU theory, that soft investor powerin Greenland, a presence, will thwart military moves ( don’t see them) also to advantage in securing deals without China.

That all gets too deep for me, to be honest.

Companies stand or fall on the cash.

I might have said, just my comment, that I look forward to main London market listing, which I guess will occur next year, on the back of progress. Hopefully leading to lesser volativity in the triple listing markets Amrq is now in.

The price swings are large just now, simply don’t reflect valuation on no news.

At the moment, with their due diligence, before today, I go with the institutional request to invest around 86p.