Member Info for Culpepper

you’re, i judge, just another one who likes smart-ass comments.

keep your eye on the ball, what others are seeing from last rns.

forget all the *******s from them as say they know about future rns.

It’s a warped board. Innit?

You’re a bit of a dope on your posting.

I see it up, and increasingly so, based on advancing company ( Telfer ) metrics.

Your money, selling, your choice.

Don’t flatter yourself. We know about as much as the rest. But they’re buying. I go with them rather than you.

As even head down the hole Bamps must on pi cash.

i’ve considered your worth also to the bb.

a personal sniper seems to be it.

there’s room for ******s.

I consider, breaking 11p is a result. Them out there, majority of punters, seeing it that way with profit in kind.

I go with the views of the majority, on sp, what matters to pi’s, regardless of this board.

The company is up to speed on revenue, to support exploration, and provide sp impetus.

Exploration results will be published - sometime.

It’s shares in, shares out. Of no particular consequence.

I take your point. But it is in what the majority do with their cash.. Them out there. Trends based upon RNS.

At first sight, 14 p is a stretch. April news will see it, or not. Another ‘grey’ post from me.

They say, 20p or so. Don’t matter. That’s positive. As I said, they and all the websites have to play catch up, as RNSs are released. Some of the informative websites haven’t taken recent releases into account.

They’re having to play catch up. It’s now beginning to appear, , contrary to previous on sp movement, the brokers have a chance of becoming correct over 12 months. And arguably, it’ll get better in time.

Sometimes you have to look back to see how far you’ve come. All Ggp was saying as a footnote to each RNS prior to acquisition was they required access to Telfer to de risk the project.

They now have much more than that. And wide optionality.

Come a long way, hasn’t it, from arguments about whether Ggp should buy it, and the cost of closing down Telfer mine.

Argument/discussion has moved on. The original discussion was whether there would be a gap in revenue - it is increasingly evident that is tidying itself up, to the extent of Hav and Telfer co-producing.

We wait on the FS. Subject to that, I don’t think anything has changed on time-scales to enhanced commercial gold production.

Those of us not asking for or getting anything from Day and Co will just have to wait for the FS I guess.

Sorry about that. There you go.

“Leave off Culpepper. The Return on investment relates to everything.”

Again we agree.

Matty will work it out, of course he will, when and if the time comes , and he gets

“Leave off Culpepper. The Return on investment relates to everything.”

Again we agree

Leave off what? You’re trying to dig in and make the running on soft ground, on as described by you, a ‘grey’ post.

I leave it there.

With Ggp it’s certainly down to growth - capital enhancement, over time, as expressed on here. Northern Star, all that oft repeated stuff.

Divi’s would be nice, but on my assessment here, and looking at a photo of one of Bamps’ soirées, most posters might not see it.

“The idea is fine, you invest early, so your return with dividends is higher in terms of the percentage of what you invested………”

So we agree.

I was responding to Matty’s post, as put. Read it.

You have chosen to giggle and bicker, by bringing forward matters on which I made no comment, in an effort to ‘win.’