Member Info for confuseddotcom

Not that limited….! Bring on next week, feel like the tide has turned here, sell off was well over done and company listening with regards to communication.

So 25k bought vs over 2m sold today and SP up !!

Worth reading through the company presentation for those that haven't, everything they predicted about the Molly project is demonstrated in the latest set of drill results (high grade epithermal veins 0.5-3m wide, strong structural trend linking the know Molly 1 mineralisation with Molly 2) . It feels like they know exactly what the potential is here and how it will play out.

https://jangadamines.com/investors/presentations/

Couldn't agree more, I posted this comparison with Palito early stage drilling before all the naysayers took over the board; to me its an excellent start:

Vein Widths

Molly 0.5-0.89m, Palito 0.2-1m

Gold Grades

Molly 5.75-20.7gt, Palito 10-30gt

Polymetallic

Molly AG, CU, credits Zn/Pb noted, Palito CU only

Continuity

Molly CONFIRMED 100-150m Extension and new parallel zone (Molly 2), Palito - it took significant extra drilling to confirm this.

Grades and widths are a strong match. Molly’s 11.5–20.7 g/t over ~0.5 m intercepts are squarely in the range that Serabi mined profitably for years (and continues to intersect in brownfield drilling). The 20.7 g/t hole sits with Palito’s better shoots.

Geological setting is almost identical. Both are mesothermal/epithermal quartz-sulphide veins in the Tapajós Belt, structurally controlled, with “blowout” high-grade zones and polymetallic credits. The RNS correctly highlights this analogy to Palito/Serabi.

Critical success factor for Palito was persistence and volume. Rio Tinto walked away from narrow veins; Serabi drilled systematically, proved multiple parallel structures, and developed underground. Molly is at the “Rio Tinto exit / early Serabi” point — exciting intercepts exist, but scale and continuity still need proving with more drilling.

Molly advantages at this stage: Polymetallic credits (Ag, Cu, Zn, Pb) may prove to be valuable . New Molly 2 discovery adds immediate exploration leverage that Palito built over several years.

Clearly more work needed to sure up and define the resource but at this stage the results so far are very encouraging.

Comparison was Palito Early Stage v's Molly early stage, at this stage Palito had only identified Cu. The fact they went on to find the same makes the similarities between the projects and geology even more compelling

Vein Widths

Molly 0.5-0.89m, Palito 0.2-1m

Gold Grades

Molly 5.75-20.7gt, Palito 10-30gt

Polymetallic

Molly AG, CU, credits Zn/Pb noted, Palito CU only

Continuity

Molly CONFIRMED 100-150m Extension and new parallel zone (Molly 2), Palito - it took significant extra drilling to confirm this.

Grades and widths are a strong match. Molly’s 11.5–20.7 g/t over ~0.5 m intercepts are squarely in the range that Serabi mined profitably for years (and continues to intersect in brownfield drilling). The 20.7 g/t hole sits with Palito’s better shoots.

Geological setting is almost identical. Both are mesothermal/epithermal quartz-sulphide veins in the Tapajós Belt, structurally controlled, with “blowout” high-grade zones and polymetallic credits. The RNS correctly highlights this analogy to Palito/Serabi.

Critical success factor for Palito was persistence and volume. Rio Tinto walked away from narrow veins; Serabi drilled systematically, proved multiple parallel structures, and developed underground. Molly is at the “Rio Tinto exit / early Serabi” point — exciting intercepts exist, but scale and continuity still need proving with more drilling.

Molly advantages at this stage: Polymetallic credits (Ag, Cu, Zn, Pb) may prove more valuable than Palito’s Cu-only by-product. New Molly 2 discovery adds immediate exploration leverage that Palito built over several years.

Clearly more work needed to sure up and define the resource but at this stage the results so far are very encouraging.

These high grade shoots are typical of the Tapajós epithermal-to-mesothermal vein systems, look at Palito, São Chico andTocantinzinho deposits. You are either being deliberately misleading or haven't got a Scooby Do ! Excellent result, great progress, genuinely excited to see the rest of the results. We know know, as many suspected, that the delays are down to the labs - sounds like they have a plan to accelerate this. Investment case has improved, POG will continue to rise for well established reasons, we are fully funded; what's not to like. This touched 3p in recent months, with this positive news I see no reason why we won't reach and surpass this level.

POG holding up well, Molly results due anytime, feels like the starts are aligning. Genuinely surprised that more people are not taking a position but confident that I am in the right place ! GLA.

Oh I thought it was at 1 and 2p ! :-)

Different prices so assumed not.

Someone’s gone big, some delayed buys just come through.

Agree, excellent opportunity to get in/top up today, this touched 3p recently without the recent additions so got plenty of scope for a run up. Massively undervalued in my opinion.

Overview:

· 1,100m, 10-hole programme completed, primarily targeting TP2, a 1.0 km NE-SW trending anomaly and one of six high potential targets identified

· Gold mineralisation intersected in all holes at TP2, with a minimum of 0.5 g/t Au

· Best results include:

o DDJG25-05: 1.32m @ 43.61g/t Au

o DDJG25-02: 11.20m @ 0.83g/t Au including 0.85m @ 3.13g/t Au and 4.45m @ 0.60 g/t Au

o DDJG25-06: 0.41m @ 6.41g/t Au and 0.50m @ 0.81g/t Au

o DDJG25-03: 0.60m @ 3.16g/t Au

o DDJG25-07: 3.02m @ 0.86g/t Au including 1.00 @ 1.52g/t Au

· Vein swarms identified providing high confidence in the Project's prospectivity

· High-grade gold intercept in hole DDJG25-05 confirmed the continuity of mineralisation indicating that the system remains open along strike and at depth.

· ICP-MS analyses will be conducted on the available samples to further investigate the presence of other metals, including copper (Cu).

· Trenching and drill results are being evaluated to determine the next steps for advancing the discovery.

· Drill results combined with trenching will support a preliminary resource modelling study to increase the existing

Look pretty good in comparison to the last set from WSBN (below). Progress on so many fronts, strong news flow expected, world class leadership team with expertise in Brazil - this is going to fly it is only a matter of time.

· 18m @ 0.49g/t Au and 0.004% Cu from 308m in WRSDD0015Including 5m at 1.2g/t Au and 0.002% Cu from 319m

· 1m @ 3.73 g/t Au and 0.1% Cu from 191m in WRSDD0015

· 14m at 1.0g/t Au and 0.2% Cu from 266m in WRSDD0008Including 7m at 2g/t Au and 0.38% Cu from 273mAnd 1m at 6.4g/t Au and 0.69% Cu from 273m

· 25m at 0.28g/t Au and 0.11% Cu from 195m in WRSDD0006 Including 1m at 5.4g/t Au and 0.26% Cu from 198m

· 3m at 0.18g/t Au and 0.82% Cu from 166m in WRSDD0006 Including 1m at 0.27 g/t Au and 2.27% Cu from 166m

· 1m at 6.48g/t Au and 15 ppm Cu from 246m in WRSDD0009

· 10m at 0.48g/t Au and 0.03% Cu from 117m in WRSDD0011Including 1m at 3.2g/t Au and 0.06% Cu from 122m

Same on ADVFN??

In auction NT.

On the move now, current levels in no way reflect recent developments

Like this earlier tweet as well, financials ramp up if we get to 350K oz (which they seem very confident about), sky is the limit if we get to the CEO's started 1m oz target. The management team seem genuinely excited.

Project getting more exciting the more work we do. Extent/style of mineralised system, grade and shallow nature of the deposit suggest a very low CAPEX and OPEX - a 20k oz pa operation (PEA target) has potential to generate c.$40-50m - mkt cap c.£6m

MILA looks like a good option but I would still argue that Jangada has the larger potential. From what I can see the MILA resource is 100,00 oz AU (Non JORC), versus the Jangada 210,000 oz AU (CBRR but not JORC compliant) with upside to 350K and a target of 1m oz. (up to 50% share of this). MILA market cap £15m vs £5m here. Jangada grade 3.165 g/t Au vs 1.5 g/t AU @ MILA.

As others have said, fully funded - stated in black and white in recent RNS. I am not normally surprised by these markets but the price movement over the last few days has left me dumfounded, what's not to like in terms of the prospects for Jangada, I must be missing something..........

Jangada Mines Plc (AIM: JAN), a Brazil focussed natural resource development company, is pleased to announce a positive update on its fully funded exploration programme at the 7,211-hectare Paranaíta Gold Project ("Paranaíta" or the "Project") located in Brazil's historically significant Alta Floresta-Juruena Gold Province.

The programme aims to expand the current resource from 210,000 to ~350,000 oz Au under the JORC code, and fast-track a PEA for a high-grade, open pit mine producing ~20,000 oz Au/year. The priority is the high-grade TP2 - c.106,600 oz @ 16.65 g/t Au and TP3.2 (within TP3) - c.34,600 oz @ 1.35 g/t Au zones, two of the six identified targets along the 8km mineralised corridor which has 15+ high-grade gold occurrences and historical sampling up to 135 g/t Au.