Member Info for colins

Y

Https://marineindustrynews.co.uk/clean-maritime-demonstration-competition/?utm_source=Marine+Industry+News&utm_campaign=96aca309eb-EMAIL_CAMPAIGN_2024_01_29_12_15&utm_medium=email&utm_term=0_-96aca309eb-%5BLIST_EMAIL_ID%5D

The 1% of ships currently prepared to burn alternative fuels make up 2% of the fleet’s deadweight capacity. Another 1% of ships and 4% of deadweight capacity are readied for alternative fuels so they can more easily be retrofitted.

https://www.bimco.org/news-and-trends/market-reports/shipping-number-of-the-week/20231220-snow#:~:text=The%201%25%20of%20ships%20currently,can%20more%20easily%20be%20retrofitted.

There's only one fuel that could soon be available to the majority of shipping out there now and strikes me that most of the new tonnage being built can still use it going forward.

Building these vessels and supplying them with Methonol and putting in place the global infrastructure to keep a ready supply at hand is all blks. If, and when, Quadrise becomes the accepted and cost efficient way of bunkering these vessels, be they cruise liners, bulkers, container ships etc the fuels that will be supplied through QED will become the norm and as they change to 100% carbon free within the next 5 years or so, well to wake, the company will be simply massive. Now I am not a ramper but!

All we need is that big signature to get the ball rolling.

How do you value Quadrise, signing the agreements will make the difference between a mediocre low value company and one that could be worth into the billions. So I am sure the negotiations that are going on are really quite spectacular and intense and when all is revealed I would expect everybody to be happy, for now and forever more. Be patient and all will be revealed. At least that is what I am hoping.

Wouldn't it make sense to run the pump in a loop with the fuel for a couple of days before getting into the real thing. Or maybe they do this, but it would check the new pump.

But I cannot imagine another failure. Aghhhh

Have they been running LONO's etc etc etc. It seems others can just put a fuel on the market as they wish, all very odd. And for goodness sake stop knocking the company and its management and also the price of the shares. If and I am certain it will be soon, the fuels that Quadrise are proposing get past their testing stages, and that is imminent, far more imminent than last week or the week before that or the week before that.

Lets get this over the line and then we will all be singing like Canaries, well most of us will be, their will always be the miserable B******* out there who will moan whatever happens. It has been a long journey and now let us all sit back and watch what happens over the next few weeks and try to enjoy the moment.

3 p a share be bu****** it will go to 50p once the ball gets rollling.

If Quadrise cannot sell their tech to MSC I will eat my hat. We must be on the final furlong.

https://gcaptain.com/the-invisible-climate-impact-of-a-cruise-ship/?subscriber=true&goal=0_f50174ef03-37ba3c3abb-170322386&mc_cid=37ba3c3abb&mc_eid=a2c0b667f7

Https://apigateway.agilitypr.com/distributions/history/50af3574-2ab1-419b-a3a7-ae9e1423a94c

Can somebody explain how, with so many share sales this morning, a sea of red, the share price has risen.

Why should Morocco fail. Just think of the years of thought and the effort that has gone into getting this far, by one would assume very intelligent people. Lets assume that the trial is a success and that the supply contract is forthcoming. From here on it would be a case of other similar companies globally seeing the reasons that Morocco have signed up and follow suite. If Morocco can supply a product, or produce it at a better cost per ton, others cannot idly stand by and watch, in the world of competition they would have to get onto the band waggon. It just takes one, as with MSC, for others to follow.

As for the 25 bagger, look back at some of the tech companies who had a share price of only a few dollars and are now into the thousands, by 2030, and that is not that far ahead, the 25 bagger of today could well be a 100 bagger or more. The dozens or more of LTH are not stupid, despite some of the things that have been said over the years on this forum caused in part through frustration, and can I am sure see the potential of what they have invested in, it just needs to get that ball rolling down the hill.

Heavy fuel oil use and shipping

Since the middle of the 19th century, HFO has been used primarily by the shipping industry due to its low cost compared with all other fuel oils, being up to 30% less expensive, as well as the historically lax regulatory requirements for emissions of nitrogen oxides (NOx) and sulfur dioxide (SO2) by the IMO.[2][3] For these two reasons, HFO is the single most widely used engine fuel oil on-board ships. Data available until 2007 for global consumption of HFO at the international marine sector reports total fuel oil usages of 200 million tonnes, with HFO consumption accounting for 174 million tonnes. Data available until 2011 for fuel oil sales to the international marine shipping sector reports 207.5 million tonnes total fuel oil sales with HFO accounting for 177.9 million tonnes.[8]

Marine vessels can use a variety of different fuels for the purpose of propulsion, which are divided into two broad categories: residual oils or distillates. In contrast to HFOs, distillates are the petroleum products created through refining crude oil and include diesel, kerosene, naphtha and gas. Residual oils are often combined to various degrees with distillates to achieve desired properties for operational and/or environmental performance. Table 1 lists commonly used categories of marine fuel oil and mixtures; all mixtures including the low sulfur marine fuel oil are still considered HFO.[3]

So approx, 200 million tonnes a year at 50$ a tonne to QED. Lets assume 100 million tonnes of MSAR is sold once the shipping industry has to bight the bullet and burn cleaner fuels. This would give a share price of based on profit only £1.56 and it would be normal to multiply this by 4 so say £6.26. on shipping only and then you have the funds from Utah and the likes of Morocco. Plus whatever else QFD can create and sell as we get closer to 2030. At the moment nobody needs to use a different fuel such as MSAR, but they will very soon and then we will maybe not be able to keep up with demand. The other thing is the oil industry has to find a way to use up the leftovers at the bottom of the barrel. Like all LTH I have been hanging in with QFD and the lights are beginning to come on. If it gets to a £ I will be a very happy man.

GLA

NESTE USING LOW-EMISSION BUNKER FUEL FOR

TANKER PAIR

Written by Rhys Berry

Neste has announced that two tankers transporting its renewable diesel from Finland to Sweden will be fuelled with its

lower-emission marine fuel, Neste Marine 0.1 Co-processed.

From this month, the tankers SUULA and KIISLA will be using the ISCC PLUS certified marine fuel, which is produced at

the Finnish energy company’s refinery in Porvoo by processing renewable raw materials together with fossil raw materials

in the conventional refining process.According to Neste, the fuel, which has a composition and performance ‘similar to

conventional marine fuels’, provides users ‘up to 80% lower greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions’ over the fuel’s life cycle

compared to fossil fuel. ‘We are committed to working with our suppliers and partners to reduce emissions across our

entire value chain,’ said Markku Korvenranta, Executive Vice President for Oil Products business unit at Neste. ‘Powering

two tankers transporting our renewable diesel with a marine fuel to reduce greenhouse gas emissions is yet another step

towards reaching our sustainability targets.’

https://gcaptain.com/cummins-and-danfoss-join-forces-to-help-decarbonize-maritime/?subscriber=true&goal=0_f50174ef03-4d4dda359d-170322386&mc_cid=4d4dda359d&mc_eid=a2c0b667f7

https://gcaptain.com/fueleu-maritime-marks-the-beginning-of-the-end-for-dirty-fuels-in-shipping/?subscriber=true&goal=0_f50174ef03-e21e3b4238-170322386&mc_cid=e21e3b4238&mc_eid=a2c0b667f7

How QFI are not riding this wave I will never know, but of course we could have tsunami any time soon .

GLA

Wow the difference a day makes!!

Many moons ago I stated that the shares would make 60p by Christmas, I stand by that. (Just a different Christmas)

So lets now hope for a few more bits of good news, at least it keeps you all happy, and so it should. The shares stand a very good chance of going to the moon, there are not that many opportunities like QFI out there, right product at the right time. O and isn't Jason just the best CEO ever. Everything forgiven I hope. GLA

Hi all, still keeping my head down below the parapet but still a LTH, unfortunately at a time of weakness I purchased more, who knows QFI could still deliver. But the arguments are still the same as last year, the year before etc etc.

But I found this and thought it would help open your minds to just how QFI can help. If it does not get scrubbed !!

https://moneyweek.com/investments/605716/net-zero-energy-revolution?utm_campaign=moneyweek_newsletter_20230222&utm_source=moneyweek_newsletter&refid=313CDF0E31F95B62467C76E5BA6D1AFE&utm_medium=email

That’s roughly thirty tons per head of the worlds total population, somebody needs to get real. But more testing, more testing and more salaries well into the future.

Nothing will change in the commercial shipping world until the companies are held against a brick wall with a gun to their heads, all they want is for the profits to keep rolling in for as long as they can squeeze the lemon. That means carrying on as usual.

Strange world. Just heading into Genoa on a ferry, maybe I should go to the MSC head office and ask their opinion. Good luck all.

https://apigateway.agilitypr.com/distributions/history/665094fa-ecd2-4cdf-9130-b365e7652cfc

He’s probably been on holiday, gotta spend his salary somewhere and no doubt it will be tax deductible. His family are probably all the same colour. I just hope the staff at QFI read this forum every day, I am sure they do, wonder if they can sleep at night.

Let’s hope for a big surprise in the next few weeks. They know of shareholder frustration, the new guys on the team must know the reasons for which they were given the positions they hold and I would like to think are driven to make this happen, did they leave good jobs to join us or were they picked up off the dole, anybody know ….