Member Info for colinH100

The only comment I would make is that for "an ex refinery process engineer" you seem to ask some very basic questions. Odd that.

Mr Babis's tweet infers that the Czech State will have a majority shareholding in EMH. The RNS states that CEZ will have a major share in EMH. There is a very significant difference between those two positions. The general concensus on the EMH site is to go with the RNS. Also Australian law would apply and they seem to protect ASX companies to a degree.

I'd think seriously about starting another career, Helpless.

Where will they get the lithium from I wonder?

Anything multiplied by zero is f all mate.

He's taking the Micky, Fyoz. He'll soon be on about "whisking up" the MSAR in a giant mixing bowl, as on the other site.

Sounds like a positive sign. The only thing that bothers me is that Mr Babis's tweet seems to suggest that CEZ will have a majority shareholding rather than the largest. There is a very significant difference. I thought this was clearly spelt out in the RNS.

I was in Melbourne in 1962. Lovely place. I was referred to as a Pommie and they thought my parents were unmarried.

I think the question was put by a regular advfn poster just taking the Micky.

If what you surmise is correct foxm, I think it verges on being a criminal action.

What a load of pony.

When a single share is sold it is merely a trader balancing his or her books. It is not a secret sign that an RNS is on its way. Forget the conspiracy theories.

Hooray up she rises early in the morning.

(Well it worked when Robin did it)

And the share price moves downwards. Un******* belevable.

Have a look at the Reuters announcement, dated today, over on the EMH site. It would seem all systems go.
Surely KDNC can't **** that up.

Fingers, I have just read your 5-23 posting, (should have scrolled down before posting) which would seem to confirm that CEZ could be the largest shareholder but not the majority shareholder.

I thought CEZ were potentially going to be the "largest" shareholder not the "majority" shareholder. There is a very significant difference in those two positions. Does anyone know for sure?

I thought the translation was dreadful. You think they would have somebody fluent in English, or Australian, doing it for them.

Who on Earth would take over this dog?

This has to come good in the not too distant future. We own a good percentage of EMH which will be immensely valuable within the next 2 years. Happy days.