RE: Bell further dilution20 Jan 2024 12:33
I am not sure TopCatz, isn't that one of the main things that TEK provide - Assistance with financing decisions and development? I don't think Cliff has shown a great deal of acumen in terms of being able to attract financing at attractive terms. I still remember that time when the SP was 20p and they raised at 10p. Financing conditions were quite favourable then as well. That really damages sentiment and trust.
We have at least 3 out of 4 startups which are really breaking out and yet the SP hasn't gone up as much as it should have because of this. Although TEK do deserve considerable credit for putting these businesses in the first place. I was more pleased in how they structured the financing for the Microsalt IPO recently. Since those businesses were originally set up i am not really sure what Cliff has to do on a day to day basis. Is he working 1 day a week?
On BELL, it has been incredibly frustrating because they have produced a really great product and they have always had the demand, but they have not been able to increase production. How difficult is it to produce 1000 units of a medical device a month? Why does it take 4 years? Isn't this something that TEK are supposed to have expertise in and offer its inexperienced businesses? A lot of it, especially recently, has been due to financing concerns. Again, this is something they could have planned for and secured when market cap was >£150 million. If BELL had demonstrated they could produce in numbers and they had the financing secure then they would have probably have had even more orders than the many they have already received. If they had done these things i expect the SP would be 150-200p today. Instead, now they have gotten into bed with this unscrupulous TMT.
I am expecting financing conditions to improve this year and at least 3 of the 4 businesses to show very strong growth. So the SP should improve a lot. However, a lot has been permanently left on the table and goodwill has been damaged.