Member Info for CHELSEA7

Inanaco, I did. I think you did a very good job of reminding us of value. I tend in most things to half it and then half it again, and it made a nonsense of our current M/Cap of £25m. I was never one for talk of £billions, and for a long time have used 50p a share as a first target. Lets face it sitting at 6.65 some might even consider that to be ramping. Ever mindful of how IMM performed, albeit being in a Phase 3 trial, but whilst in that trial it hit lows of 25p and i believe it went as high as £2 as results neared................and it failed, and was just about one product really. That was 8 times from its low, a similar rise here whilst accepting comparing is not the most accurate calculation would put us at 53p.

Seems such a quiet day today, i think there has been 3 sells totalling 27k, a far cry from thevvolume this week again albeit time for bigger trades to continue. I go back to those two new appointments, Scancell are hardly waving a white flag and i do feel there is good reason for them, maybe it is need, but i feel the need is to get a deal over the line. Will we? well thats the risk/reward issue, presuming the positives about the science are right the issue is funding and sentiment, I feel both will follow.

Well TBH I stopped looking until i topped up, lol. I just couldn"t see us dropping below a M/Cap of £30m, but here we are at £25.8m. Like you with a few items of good news, I feel we can get back to £75m for starters.

I think the biggest problem we have all had is never being able to put a true value to our shares. Hopefully that will change, and the sooner the better. I try very hard not to even think of a placing at these levels, and there was just a couple of items that stood out positively from a few e-mail exchanges I had, especially a couple of items that were highlighted in capitals. Glad Ruck reminded us of Confirmation Bias, I certainly suffered for that and it was Knowlesi 3/4 years ago that brought that up, and if i talk to anybody who is speaking positively i naturally adopt the negative, which is why I commented on Ivys post as being patronising, I would imagine we have all learnt that lesson by now.

Ruck, well it is like i have said a few times on here, if it did ever get to zero, it would certainly hurt, but not change what is, but if it even got to 50p, £110k would make a difference to me, simply because at 55 I had to give up my work, will be 62 in April, so never retired because i could. Now i"ve doubled my holding my interest has grown again. For me it is a calculated gamble as much as it could be. I thought FTSEBUYERS post yesterday summed it up quite well.

ValJu, I thought you weren"t posting anymore? Understand, said that a few times myself. ATB

Afternoon Obelix and Freddyboy, yes we as shareholders of any company that we believe in and suffered big losses do deserve good news. Unfortunately the things we want to hear the most are nearly always what the company cannot say. I guess here like many others it is where is the next money going to come from. Hope a few of you clawed some profit in from that rise this week, just surprised me that again VAL has the capability of rising 40% so quickly. Unfortunately on AIM these days the inevitable fall back occurred by those trading, who can blame them.

Obelix, or anyone what trial are they starting in April on 401?

Ruck, well calculating my losses on a daily basis has really sharpened me up, lol.

While on the subject of inanaco, I am very grateful for the input here,. I will never be able to fluently debate the science as we see with crumbs, Wildforce, Ray, Boom and a few others who have sadly left this BB, which is why i don"t join in on debates. Thanks to them all and my own experiences i really get what and why we are doing what we are, but specific to TFs irritating criticisms of me ihave learnt to be very grateful to those like ONW, Lozan our Ruck and many others for getting me to understand many other aspects of a share, so to even suggest i regard them as "shite" is so wide of the mark. Unfortunately for inanaco the share price has fallen to todays level, which has made many question his positivity about our outcome, and worse mkakes him a target of blame for others decisions.

Just for clarity, my criticisms of him a couple of years back were to do with his aggression and that ""buy and hold stratagy". I am very sorry it happened, I have no problem challenging some posts, as happened with Ruck yesterday, it was nothing personal and we move on, I am sorry though that it seems Ivy has left this BB after my questioning his motives, but TBH if you are filtering somebody, why continue daily to wind them up. Maybe there are just too many of us unable to debate his knowledge, which believe me having met him many times is quite amazing. Boom taught me not to try and change somebody, anybody, so I began to take in what i understood and ignore some wilder claims, which do unfortunately invite those that really dont like him to have more ammunition to fire at him. I just wonder where we would all be without many of the explanations he offers and regardless of that in whatever field it might be when i see a pack against one person i tend to support the underdog, which does not mean i agree with the manner in which he can speak to people which has alienated so many.

Sorry to say that inan, but it is the truth IMHO. I really hope that helps explain my thoughts against the very personal, irrelevant attacks from TF. Time for a cuppa, but after seven years so many of us posting here do we really need to row, about what we know? Makes you think............................

I then made two further buys at 35p and 30p, fortunately i have managed to double my holdings at mid 7s average, so now hold 220k at a 15p average. Never imagined i would evr get that kind of quantity, certainly never imagined we would fall this far, but understand it i think. Given just some decent news and some capital injection I believe 15p will be passed, hence B/E, and the significence of what Scancell are doing ironically hit home the following year.

Like many here, my confidence has been tested the last couple of years, like many expected the company to be sold back in 2014. Still though in 2019, i haven"t seen the staggering results many expected in combination trials, recent news about Car-T failures, and the fact that checkpoint inhibitors only seem to help in 25% of patients still, do make me think the market is wide open for us still, even taking into account some amazing advances that have taken place in the understanding of cancer in general, grateful we have LD at the helm, despite her dual responsibilities with the Hospital, but even then the respect she has must and will be a positive for Scancell as we find ourselves becoming etter known and closer to trials. Just wish we knew more about the stratagy now, but do understand it is very difficult for Scancell to update on many issues, so hoping with trust, and the remarkable data we have achieved with SCIB1 , the two recent appointments, and our flirtations with BioNTech and a few others, like Karolinska, ISA etc that we are closer than ever to some richly deserved good news. Lets face it the risk/reward has arguably never been better ATB

Thanks,

spre, it must have been, After 38 years odd of having no real interest in shares i took a position in Zol, purely because of Abromovich and a few sharetips in the Sunday papers, I joined LSE around that time but hadn"t read the SCLP BB, but at that time it featured in the highest risers list for a few days. I tthink it was 18p when i saw the BB, got the gist of the company and by some miracle i had just clawed back some losses from ZOL after averaging down, sold there went to buy here and it was 41p to buy in, Well still averaging down nearly 7 years on, lol.

Oh do shut up TF, I just questioned him posting a wind up specific to inanaco which leads to further rows all day like there are on ADVFN too. I also questioned the relevance of telling us that it would have been wiser to have moved our investment into VAL that morning as they were 27% up, it was actually up 43% at the time and is back to its starting price already. What was the point of his post. Was it to tell many here how to suck eggs or was it just a direct attack on Inanaco who Ivy perversely has filtered and we all have to endure the rows day in day out.

And so as to stop that happening again I haven"t spoken to you for well over a year, and hopefully will be for many years more!!!! If Panama7s ramblings every day turn you on, same thing for five years then enjoy it, I understand why some very decent people have left this site because of Inanaco. Nothing i can do about that, when i did a couple of years back, you posted dreadful things about me, which i will never forgive or forget, but you allow the same thing to occur each day on ADVFN without responding in any way? And you call me a hypocrite. Those on ADVFN, including boom, goosed and surprisingly for you Lozan and even ONW I have never called shite, I was talking of the general atmosphere which you know was my point. So pack it in, will not respond anymore, it is pointless and painful for folks to read this carp. Move on, and remember despite my fall out with inanaco, iget no pleasure from a dozen or so people insulting him daily, obviousely you do!!!

Yep, it was long before i even knew there was BBs, it followed after a good article. I think after selling a small ZOL holding I bought 7k shares at £3k. Roll on the times!!!

Will take 30k at 6.588

Morning Ruck, yeah i bought my first tranche on or about the 21st at 41p. Makes me wonder just how much work and improvement has been made since then too. I am sure in hindsight they, like us would probably have done a few things different too. Well they say ten years is par from conception to possible Approval, I would take that.

My biggest reason for hanging on here, have a good day Ruck

Nomlungu, well it is simply a case of costs and returns. Perhaps my wording was a bit confusing but im pretty sure you knew exactly what i meant. So to clarify those who bought at 1.30 need a 50% rise from hereto B/E/.Sorry for confusion, if there was any.

Morning you guys, another rollercoaster week, have a chilled weekend.

The first RNS announcing Moditope..........

..........Wed, 15th Aug 2012 13:12
RNS Number : 0889K
Scancell Holdings Plc
15 August 2012
Â
15 August 2012

Scancell Holdings Plc

('Scancell')

Â

 ModitopeÔ vaccine technology platform

Â

 Stimulation of killer CD4 T cells with potent anti-tumour activity

Scancell Holdings Plc, (AIM:SCLP), the developer of therapeutic cancer vaccines, today announces the development of a new platform technology (ModitopeÔ) that stimulates the production of killer CD4 T cells with powerful anti-tumour activity. The Directors believe that this new discovery could have a profound effect on the way that cancer vaccines are developed.

CD4 responses to cancer associated antigens have been notoriously difficult to generate whether presented as peptides, proteins or DNA. CD4 cells are vital for effective anti-tumour immunity. Scancell has identified and patented a series of modified epitopes that overcome this limitation. Scancell's ModitopeÔ technology produces killer CD4 T cells that destroy tumours without toxicity

Professor Lindy Durrant, Joint CEO of Scancell Holdings and Professor of Cancer Immunotherapy at Nottingham University, commented: "Not only do these unique epitopes stimulate a CD4 killer T cell response, we have also shown in tests that cancer patients can produce an immune response to these epitopes. The ModitopeÔ epitopes can be used to develop both DNA and peptide vaccines and could become an important component of many therapeutic vaccines in the future, both under development at Scancell and other companies"

Prof Peter Stern, Head of the Cancer Research UK, Immunology Group at the Paterson Institute for Cancer Research, commented: "This novel technology has the potential to transform the therapeutic cancer field. It is increasingly recognised that combining products and technologies will unlock the full potential of cancer vaccines. The ModitopeÔ technology offers those developing cancer vaccines, a means to optimise the potency of their immune targets".

David Evans, Chairman of Scancell Holdings, commented: "This highly innovative discovery opens up a new approach to the development of cancer vaccines. Whilst currently at an early stage, we are aware that the opportunities could be considerable in addition to Scancell's existing platform technology. As a result, the Board is actively evaluating its strategic options for this new technology platform and will be consulting with key shareholders in this regard. We are excited by the potential and are resolute in our aim of creating the greatest value for shareholders. The Board will update the market in due course."

So that was on the 15th August 2012, I had forgotten Peter Stern from CRUK had also commented on it then.

Morning, And I hope that helps a lot of people with concerns over how long it will take to get data from trials. Can you only imagine if it does perform that way in humans. Talk about news flow, and the performance of the SP again.

Your second line made me smile, lol.

It makes me laugh, and the only poster i miss a lot is Boom, his input and manner of posting made him very popular, goosed, always a decent poster but been away for more than two years, I am sure ONW is enjoying himself surrounded by fellow inanaco haters, Tosh still giving it large to inanaco and Panama7 still moaning. There bitterness barring boom and goosed is driven by a poor SP, isn"t it great to have inanaco to blame for that.

So stop pushing ADVFN down our throats, those who need to read it will, but there are many who dislike the site intensely, respect that. Will just add i personally despair at the lies where everyone has succesfully traded in hindsight, because they are so clever. That is my view, nothing for you to comment on, it is how i feel.

TF, you are tiresome and priceless. Your refusal to accept the reality and turn in on to "reveal my true side" is quite incredible.

Now, please filter me and let go your recounts of exactly what happened are muddled as bests, and what has it got to do with you. If you think its right for Ivy to "say" he has filtered inanaco and then spend his time directing criticism at him all day than you are as stupid as i thought. Seems you still have to get involved in everybodies posts and yes i picked him up on another swipe about the 33% VAL rise and savvy investors, he forgot to mention to sell within a coule of days as it has fallen 43% since. I have no issue with Ivy, and hope he finds it better posting on ADVFN, i will certainly enjoy less arguments every day, all centered on Inanaco, except for you who needs to be the headmaster, but its your stingy comments and conclusions that make me sick, I look forward to seeing you defend inanaco, rather that abnomish me for arguing the case not to buy and hold which you still lambast me for. TF continue the never ending chase for recs, and offer very little to any conversation, if it makes you happy. You have my blessings, just don"t replace Ivy to set the tone negatively each morning. ATB

From .85 to 1.28 represents a 50% rise, to 1.33 represents a slightly higher percentage, what is your problem?

Good observation Isleworth, most of your knowledgable posters aregue over which trade is a buy or sell every day, Nasdaq Listings where the possibilities do not exist, and they are the knowledgable posters, lol. Goodnight.