Member Info for CHELSEA7

Rec Post

No smoke without fire rats, lol.

MOD1................getting shorter, lol.

That is why they have exploratory trial designs.

Getting very uppety Aimbig.

And that is in the last few weeks.

Morning Ray, couldn"t agree more. More progress from another collaborator today, Oncimmune.

Would be nice to have a peaceful day, beneficial to all.

http://www.lse.co.uk/share-regulatory-news.asp?shareprice=SCLP&ArticleCode=er7s1qvt&ArticleHeadline=Oncimmune_and_Scancell_Present_Autoantibodies_Data

Progress for Oncimmune in the hiring stakes..............................

https://www.investegate.co.uk/oncimmune-hldngs-plc--onc-/rns/appointment-of-parag-mallick-to-scientific-board/201904020700177601U/

Buys 140k

Sells 125k

Buys 55k

Sells 50k

22.39........................you posted we had a half a chance of winning GC.Forgive me, you said again I was caught lying...........................

But this is from your post on LSE in October 18, it is in their history.......................verbatum

-"""" a half decent chance at securing 20m for the grand challenge - ""

Are you denying your own post in LSEs history?

22.32..........................Unfortunately Knowlesi your history on Scancell on LSE only goes back to October last year. I rememember as others will you bought in in the 40s and subsequently around that level. Your issues with this BOD go back that far, the claims that you were right cannot even be backed up by your posts pre October, how convenient,

Your reply..................
hahaha - ahhh there we have it - the entire BB will be cracking up on this one. C7 is claiming that because I started position building in the 40's I should be ignored. Hahahahaha..

Where did I say you should be ignored????

And this is what you do, twist it, completely and claim i have lied. Very sad and for all to see.

As ever.................."""The rest of your post is just a personal attack so I will ignore for the benefit of quality debate."""

Well quality debate is what youhave had, and in my absence an abundunce from crumbs, Ray, Wildforce, Inanaco, chester etc etc, the list goes on.......................and you denouncing each and every one of them and calling their honesty into question makes your last comment as worthless as the majority of your posts.............The rest of your post is just a personal attack so I will ignore for the benefit of quality debate..........Looking forward to seeing you enter any quality debate,, other than claiming falselyyou were right. Night

Gets Better!!!!

SCLPRe sclp only4 Dec '18
I dont think the start of the trails triggering a big material move on that news alone. You might get a 10-20% move, relief rally from no more delays possibly - but are likely to fly back to 20p on such news, very much doubt it. There is the GC - that could be more re-rate worthy

..........................Still ramping the GC!!!

And then you post this after saying we had a half decent chance..............................

Rats - I consistantly go against the consensus. While you lot were self congratualting on a GC win - A lone voice had another view. The same attempts were made - but i was proved correct.............LOL

Forgive me, you said again I was caught lying...........................

But this is from your post on LSE in October 18, it is in their history.......................verbatum

-"""" a half decent chance at securing 20m for the grand challenge - ""

Well I haven"t got the patience for it anymore, hence a good weeks break from the BB. TBVH the ""horsemen"" posted so well last week by staying on topic it made the claims look even weaker, and that is IMHO.

Interesting too was the volume last week, and if anything the ask firming up as the week drew to a close. Was wondering why it syayed on 5.90 all week with buys going through at 5.57, but Friday it rose to 5.7 suddenly, Lets see what a new week brings.

Shattered after watching Chelsea today, 1- 0 down with 5 minutes to play, in a dreadful game, and we won 2-1!!!! Better times a coming? Who knows, but as ever, keep punching, and GL with your top ups

Evening Cars, and it is all being done under the guise of ""What is best for Scancell""!!!

Reality, as already expressed, it is good for the two posters in question. One of whom refused to answer my very simple question...........How does it benefit Scancell to raise at such a low price, as early as May we are being told today!!! It doesn"t, but the same poster reckons we will be on for huge rises in 2020/2021, that keeps changing BTW.

And of course all that ""free advice"" which disregards completely any other options Scancell might have.......as if none exist, lol. GL Cars, as i say I am happy to wait and hear from Scancell if anything has changed from the AGM, nor from two individuals making funding an issue NOW, for their own personal gains. ATB

Think I will wait for the BOD to decide on what we do with funding requirements Knowlesi. With all due respect they know more than any of us do and as you say, all you say, is purely speculation!!!!

Night you guys.

Tee hee. It is funny, especially with knowlesi how everything that might be seen as a positive is purely speculation...............except his posts which are naturally a fact. Lol.